Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking for some answers regarding the settings on a EBC in regards to the tune.

Will there be any affect on my tune if i dial in the Gain and start boost/set gain on my EBC?When the tune was done on my car last, the tuner only altered the "set".

I am happy with the boost it's running, however after reading about the Gain and set gain for my EBC, i am starting to think that maybe i am missing out on some response due to the Gain and set gain(start boost) not being altered.

F.Y.I, Car in question is a r33 gtst utilising a Greddy Profec B spec 2, however i feel that this question could relate to other cars aswell.

Thankyou in advance.

(feel free to insult me if this has already been covered)

It might hit load points that were unaccounted for during the tune and might do unfavourable things.

Ideally a tuner with at least half a brain would interpolate values in those load rows and surrounding areas.

You might be able to help it spool up to full boost a bit faster by keeping it fully shut longer... or progressively opening it up a bit early to avoid a boost spike past the set value... Depends what alterable settings your EBC actually provides.

Either way, you're not going to be able to:

1. Take advantage of the altered boost curve without a touchup tune to take the different airflow into account.
2. Visibly see what differences its making to the boost curve without graphing PSI to RPM, once again, on the dyno.

You COULD see how different it feels by changing it and then taking it for a drive, but you're risking bad air/fuel mixtures (and it'll feel slow, even if you've nailed the best possible boost curve for your engine, because its not tuned for it)

Do you have a wideband? Seeing as our cars have fuel pressure regulators that increase fuel pressure as boost pressures increase, I would think you would be fairly safe in that respect. However if your timing map is aggressive for building boost, knock may be of an issue.

Call your tuner and see what he says. But if you set your gain for the best spool and it is ultimately not much different than before It's not as much of a worry.

Record your current settings, change to desired settings, reverse if it doesn't work with your tune.

Dial in as much gain as you can without spiking over desired max boost. You want as much early response as possible while keeping a steady boost through the Rev range.

  • 1 month later...

Cheers all for the replies, had a break over Chrissy and gonna give it a try utilising the power fc hand controller knock display and the wideband a/f gauge I installed just last week.

I think power fc is a map ecu? Only reason I guess that is due to it utilising the map cells to determine Load values....

Before I start this, will there be any noticeable improvement keeping in mind it is the stock turbo running 11.5 psi max. (Safe limits from my minimal knowledge)

Or does altering those settings only effect aftermarket, bigger turbos?

Thanks heaps in advance.

There's a number of things to address in your post.

1) MAP vs map. MAP is Manifold Absolute Pressure. Measuring this is one way to get the main load input to an ECU. The alternative is to measure the air flow directly, using an Air Flow Meter (AFM). Original Nissan ECU uses AFM. Power FC also uses AFM. There is a variant of the Power FC available called the D Jetro that is modified to use MAP.

A map is a table of values, addressed by row and column. MAP and map have nothing to do with each other.....except that in an ECU where MAP is used as the load index then one of the axes in the map will be MAP. If that doesn't make sense, then read it 10 times. It will eventually.

2) The Power FC's knock indicator is a load of crap, at least partially because the Nissan knock sensors are pretty crap. You can't really trust them to tell you whether you have any knock at all, let alone whether you have dangerous levels. If you want to tune to find where it knocks and back it off into safe regions you really need a dedicated knock box or a good knock audio system so you can listen for yourself.

3) The stock turbo does not have a "safe limit". 11.5 psi is about as high as you can push the boost on a stock turbo WITH A STOCK ECU. This is because the stock ECU will usually have a spaz at about that level. The stock ceramic turbo can and will let go at ANY BOOST LEVEL AT ALL. The higher the boost then the more likely it is to die and the shorter time it is likely to live. That being said, many have died at stock boost, many have died at 10 psi, more have died at 12 psi, by the time you get to 14 psi you're really asking for it, by the time you're running 16 psi you're lucky if you can get it to go all the way up the street on boost. Some freak turbos have held together at silly boost levels like 17 psi for a long time....but it doesn't matter because they're running outside their efficiency range and not making the power you'd expect anyway.

Run 11.5 psi and cross your fingers that your turbo is not a fragile one. Most of the original ones still running are by definition not fragile, because they have made it this far!

  • Like 1

Until read your running a stock turbo i was going to say sometimes they wont set the gain up on and agressive turbo to make it more driveable when it first comes on but with a stock turbi u really do want it all on asap

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Major thread necro but how bad of a job is it to DIY? Looking at it online it looks like if you reuse your ring and pinion as long as those are in good condition it should be fine to just pull the axles/front cover and replace the diff that way? Or should I be replacing everything and doing preload measurements/gear mesh testing like the factory service manual mentions for the rear diff?
    • in my list I had the R33 GTR as the best Skyline. Infact I had all GTR's (33>34=32), the NSX, the GTO, the 300ZX, the 180SX, the S15 better than the FD RX7. I had the MR2 and the A80 as 'just' better. I also think the DC5R Integra looks better but this is an 01 onwards car. I also think the FC>FD. It's almost like aesthetics are individual! The elements @GTSBoy likes about the FD and dislikes about the 180 are inverse in my eyes. I hate the rear end of the FD and it's weird tail lights that are bulbous and remind me of early hyundai excels. They are not striking, nor iconic, nor retro cool. The GTO has supercar proportions. I maintain these look much better in person (like the NSX) especially with nice wheels and suspension which is mandatory for all cars pretty much. Some (or all) of these you have to see in person to appreciate. You can't write a car off until you see one in the flesh IMO. Like most people we probably just like/dislike cars which represent certain eras of design or design styles in general. I also think the 60's Jag E type looks HORRIBLE, literally disgusting, and the 2000GT is nothing to write home about. FWIW I don't think the Dodge Viper Gen1's have aged very well either. You can probably see where I rate bubbly coupes like the FD. I know we're straying now but the C4 and C5 absolutely murder the Viper in the looks department as time goes on, for my eyes. Wouldn't surprise me if people who love the FD, also love the MX5, Dodge Viper, Jag E Type, etc etc.
    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
    • Yup but for me its the HR ! Cut my teeth on the old holden 6s in the day ! And here's me thinking in the day it was also the 300ZX and the Mitsubishi GT3000 ! All, as well had good lines, but always seemed to need finishing off, style wise.
×
×
  • Create New...