Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A bit on cyl 5 mate & im thinkin that cyl was the one not firing, i got plugz n stuff but need to swap plug tool tomoz for superchep.

If you have oil in the no 5 runner of your single setup you have most likely blown the piston ring, if it wasn't firing because of no spark then the engine would run rough and the runner would most likely smell like fuel.

I think you have popped a ring.

SO i need some f**king help, heres how it iz:

bought car after sitting 2 years and forged motor with 20k km on it, blown turbo rear housing (turbo removed & gone), seller lost interest and boought an f6.

came with an f6bb turbo i fitted and made lines n dump etc. I finally started it fine and then found it to be very smokey when revved. I pulled turbo intake off and BAM oil everywhere, took dump off and BAM oil everywhere.

runtime 5 min with 1mm restrictor. I figured well seals are f**ked for oil to get into front and back.

Prev owner said turbo only had 10k km on it and was very surprised & gonna look into it.

So i buy a r33 turbo just to get this car moving & regod and.............BAM same thing again oil in front and rear housing after few min startup and no restrictor and now im furious.....well at the time i was, but the guy gave me his word hed give me money back if it was blown as he didnt use that turbo.

NOW im thinkin do i have that bad a luck where i make 2 turbo setups work and there both f**ked ?? f**k this i should just buy a newby.

WHAT i did notice is with the r33 turbo the car was missfiring and i did notice oil was in cyl 5 from the looks of the head and manifold, so i checked the manifold from the f6 setup and there too was a bit of oil in cyl 5 there too, But surely that cant get into the front turbo housing.

SO WHAT DO YOU THINK ?

a combination of 2 f**ked turbos and oil in cyl 5 like the head gasket is f**ked or what.

SO i got a r34 op6 and made sure it was not f**ked, guy showed pics of upgraded turbo he put on and stocky was taken off in running order with 140k km on it so today i hope to fit it and see what up !!! wish me luck f**kers

Peace

do u speak engrish

Please explain.

If you have oil in the no 5 runner of your single setup you have most likely blown the piston ring, if it wasn't firing because of no spark then the engine would run rough and the runner would most likely smell like fuel.

I think you have popped a ring.

Thankyou, im hopeing no rings are f**ked as it a low km rebuilt forgieieiei, ill find out in a few hours. cheers

you may find that the only thing forged in that engine is the lies that the previous owner told you about it. lol. I hope not for your sake, time will tell.

Im friends with the prev owner fool, if the motor is in fact f**ked i will be able to sell the billet 31 spline full spool to recover my costs. EAD MOFO

Im friends with the prev owner fool, if the motor is in fact f**ked i will be able to sell the billet 31 spline full spool to recover my costs. EAD MOFO

What has the spool got to do with the engine? And why do you have it?

Im friends with the prev owner fool, if the motor is in fact f**ked i will be able to sell the billet 31 spline full spool to recover my costs. EAD MOFO

Aren't BW78 full centres on ebay for 100 bucks?

Im friends with the prev owner fool, if the motor is in fact f**ked i will be able to sell the billet 31 spline full spool to recover my costs. EAD MOFO

You should probably choose your friends more wisely ya wanker troll dole bludging loser son of Rajab bitch. Lick my chocolate starfish tosser. Lol:lol:
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...