Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I thought the V8 version was for the American Market and possibly the Australian market. But there was still going to be a twin turbo? Rezz........
Ok, the "V8 for the US market GT-R" rumour has been going around for aaaaaages now... and guess what? STILL no development of a V8 for ANY V35 platform.

I say that again: STILL no DEVELOPMENT for a V8 in ANY Skyline, be it GT-R, Stagea, sedan... what this basically means, is that Nissan are 2 years out from the release of the GT-R, and still no development of a V8. Is that enough for you guys?

The only information that has been leaked about the new GT-R development has been already posted here on SAU. This info revolves around a 3.0/3.2 V6 twin turbo, and the "e-4WD" system that'll replace the ageing ATESSA ET-S system.

I stress that the new GT-R will be ABSOLUTELY stunning in the technological side of things.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46172-06-goes-v8/page/2/#findComment-940028
Share on other sites

RB26_S15: Pull your thumb out mate and post up a scan of the article pretty please???

I guarantee I can refute ANYTHING written up in that Speed article. Speed are going for maximum sales by printing BULLSHIT.

Ok, i shall 'borrow' my mag back off my friend

Ok V8 soarers? V8 Cima's, Q45's? VH41DE, VH45DE, VK56DE... need i go on?

Japs have built better V8's than yanks have for many a year.

Ohhhhhhh Yeh LOL what was i thinking....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46172-06-goes-v8/page/2/#findComment-940772
Share on other sites

Its not going to be V8. ill put some money on this one. Speed magazine seem to publish alot of hyped up crap. i think they were talking about how nissan is releasing a V8 four door family car probably an infinity or something. how many times do you read speed magazine and think "these guys are talking shit!"

Nissan have put way too much development into the 3.5 V6 we see in the 350Z. it has also been released by nissan, that they have been testing heaps of turbo set ups on the engine too. i even remember reading in HPI or Zoom some time ago, of garrett japan doing the turbo set up in their V35 skyline coupe. with amazing results. they used a fairly small turbo set, but produced huge mid range and very impressive top end, and as it turned out... it was Nissan who requested and payed for all the turbo development for the 3.5L

the V8 thing is just to stir up everyone.

consider all the new N/A engines the japanese have designed lately... all of them make more power than the 5.7L V8 motors we see produced here or in the US. the japanese love their light weight all alloy 6cyl engines and get a ton of power out of them.

my money is on a twin turbo 3.5l V6. and i bet it will be pretty impressive. why would they need to completely develope a new V8 when they have a very potent V6?? it wouldnt be economically viable for them...

thats my ten cents anyway :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46172-06-goes-v8/page/2/#findComment-941202
Share on other sites

just to put a little more light on this title of this thread, if your reffering to "SPEED" #013 the artical is in refference to the racing history of the gt-r in the "BNR-series" and they ref to the future of the GT-R being powered by the "VQ-30DETT"

P.S. ? what base engine has powered the last passenger/sports cars NISSAN has released in OZ? hint ("i'll have a burger and fries thanks") tv add...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46172-06-goes-v8/page/2/#findComment-941515
Share on other sites

Here it is....

1. Sorry about the angle (i didnt scan it)

2. Sorry if it has nothin to do with a V8 V35 as its the first time im reading it to.

RB26_S15: Don't get me wrong mate, I'm not gonna "shoot the messenger" so to speak, but that article you scanned is the biggest piece of horse shit I've seen printed in an Aussie mag for awhile...

BELOW is EXACTLY THE SAME article as printed in Horide Auto last month, except where Speed Magazine has decievingly put "Skyline", the Infiniti M45 is in actual fact THE NEXT CEDRIC/GLORIA and that the car is going to be sold in Japan as a 2.5 or 3.5L V6, NOT as a V8 like Speed wrongly says. Add to that the fact that the M45 will be called the FUGA in Japan (and probably everywhere else...

fuga.jpg

See in BIG letters the name Fuga? Thats what the next Cedric/Gloria is getting it's name changed to.

Speed Magazine... how could they get it sooooo wrong???

Guys, in future, please run ANYTHING about the new Skyline (be it GT-R or otherwise) past me first, and I'll iron out all the potential bullshit.

Cheers lads, (thanks for the scan RB26_S15 :P)

/Rezz

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46172-06-goes-v8/page/2/#findComment-943115
Share on other sites

RB26_S15, Firstly there was no mention of a GT-R in that article so how could you say the GT-R will have a V8 and secondly nobody knows more about the Skyline scene then Rezz...:)

Justin, LOL...I'd becareful...Speed could be taking all your post and printing them word for word soon :).

Now for the article, how could they get it so wrong. I have a mate who is a part time writer for them and he knows the scene pretty well in Japan. How could they publish something so off topic, unless they think no one in Aust follows the global motor shows. The FUGA has always been said to be the replacement for the Cedric/Gloria, where did the Skyline story come from! Even if nobody picked that up, the M45 name gives it away again as the replacement for the Infiniti M45 in the States which again is not a Skyline.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46172-06-goes-v8/page/2/#findComment-943838
Share on other sites

RB26_S15, Firstly there was no mention of a GT-R in that article so how could you say the GT-R will have a V8

Like i said....

2. Sorry if it has nothin to do with a V8 V35 as its the first time im reading it to.
nobody knows more about the Skyline scene then Rezz...

:D yep, i have came to notcie that.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46172-06-goes-v8/page/2/#findComment-945347
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

That said, if you have a listen to the GT-R Testing at Nurburgring video...that engine doesn't sound FI. There's no flutter. There's no sneezing. There's no induction sucking noise, or anything you get from a turbo car that isn't OEM polished.

However, it does sound like the current crop of high revving Euro V8s. The noise its making on throttle reminds me of the Audi RS4, previous BMW M5, etc....

the reason it would suk is cause in case u didnt realize...there is kinda a war between V8's an turbo's :) .....thats y it would suk bigtime cause i hate v8's despite how much potential power they do hold....... neway....GO TURBO....down with the v8's

lol a turbo isnt an engine its a means of forced induction ... your saying the war is between small capacity straight 6's and 4cyl engines and v8 power plants... And any car enthusiest would say what your trying to say there is a complete load of uneducated shit lol.

The possibilities of forced induction with larger capacity engines is great imagine the torque you would have as soon as you put your foot down with a turbo charged v8. We arent talking about a 1980 308 or 253 out of your mums first commodore here.

Edited by fEkuaR
The possibilities of forced induction with larger capacity engines is great imagine the torque you would have

If I had to buy a family car, but could afford to buy anything with 4 doors, it would be an Audi RS6 Avant. What's better than a V8 or a turbomotor? A twin turbo V8, baby.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because all parts that are put into your papers usually are assigned a badging if they did not come with one. So other people can just check that badging to tell if it is the parts your papes outline. But my pipe has NOTHING on it whatsoever. No idea why this even passed as a Mines pipe to begin with. I see this going two ways: -nobody cares and it's a non-issue, but that is unlikely -the pipe will just have to be assigned a bagding, for sake of argument, a Mines logo, and the papers corrected accordingly If it interests you I will post what the actual solution ended up being. All I care about is that it has to sound equal length and nobody can screw me later on because of a pipe being illegal.
    • The fasteners to the pipe are not subject to TÜV I guess, if we really start putting nuts and bolts through technical tests I'm going to hang the people responsible and then myself. Usually on a modern-ish EU normed car, you would just replace the pipe. Because if you start hacking away at it and welding new pieces on the cops will definitely find a reason to tow your car. That is just how it is sadly. On old cars and imports with no clear "standard" stuff like that won't matter too much. Most cops or inspectors probably won't even really know what they are looking at. But there is experts for this stuff even among cops, and some of them know the rules to a T and even have extensive knowledge about many vehicles. For "just a pipe" to be legal it usually is included in a set of parts, like a complete intake kit or a full exhaust. For example my exhaust needs to pass a noise test, meaning they have a standardized test track with a set of instructions and they run the car through there 3x for an average noise value that is 75dB(a) at point x of the test track. If it's above that, fail. For a turbo setup to be put in your papers you have to do dyno runs, emissions testing etc. So quite costly
    • Would this not be the same for the exhaust you've posted up?  If your exhaust volume and emissions are fine, why does the brand of pipe matter? 
    • The issue is more the fact that there is inspectors that deal with japanese cars a lot and they might know what a real Mines pipe looks like. And then they're gonna get antsy and not pass your car. But I'd have to talk to one of them about this, because you know as well as me that it's just a damn pipe and it effectively doesn't do anything. As I need to have my GT2860s and my exhaust setup (and the increase in HP) TÜV'd anyways maybe they can just correct the entry in the papers or assign a badge to the front pipe. I'm no expert either though, will inquire about this.     Thanks for the insight. Not sure if having a custom made pipe is good or not. Will find out in due time I suppose. Would be kind of funny if this was made in Germany though.
    • See this is a really tricky topic as technically the same rules apply to all cars but for cars but there is a difference. If you want to modify a car like the Skyline which never existed here you have a bit more freedom as they do not adhere to EU specs anyway. Any modification you do has to be in dividually checked anyway so as long as one of the inspectors think it's ok and within the TÜV ruleset you can get stuff like a top secret rear diffuser put in your papers. Which frankly would need a shitload of tests and certificates for EU spec cars, like a 2010 BMW M3 for example. But if you DO run these tests and all tests come out ok (safety stuff for the most part) there is no problem running such a part legally. It's just way too expensive to do for a single person on one car. The most touchy parts are emissions related mods, like an exhaust, turbos, air intakes. If it makes noise or alters the carbon emissions it's essentially illegal until you prove it's not. Meaning it doesn't exceed noise limits or have worse carbon emissions. I'd say for hoses if you replace them same same it doesn't matter what material they are or what brand you use. Same for nuts and bolts usually, they won't go and specifically check that your water hoses and some bolts are 100% OEM parts, that is nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...