Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

SAU Nickname: franks

Car Make and Model: Nissan Skyline ER34

Circuit Name: Wakefield Park

Lap time: 1:12.5 (stop watch)

Modifications

Engine: fmic, exhaust, powerfc @ stock boost 0.7bar

Power: ~160kw

Suspension: fr/rr swaybars/camber/castor kits, variable rate springs

Tyres: toyo trampios r1r - fr:235/45/17 rr:255/40/17

Brakes:stock nissan with rb74 racebrake pads (fr) and bendix crap-timate (rr)

Body weight:stock nissan ER34 LESS spare space saver tyre PLUS fat bastard :P

Hey Carlo, you sure have done some improving over the past 12 months. Can you post the details of your car please?

Modifications

Engine:

Power:

Suspension:

Tyres:

Brakes:

Body weight:

...also how the lap was timed? :rofl:

Man im going to have to go to the Sept Motoconcepts EC day, i am about to drop out of the Top 10 :rofl:

2003 Eastern Creek Mods

Engine:RB25DET (26DETT is for girls! hehe), HKS pod filter, Cat Back Exhaust.

Power: 140rwkw due to boost leak

Suspension: Bilstein Shocks HKS Springs

Tyres: Worn out simex baby! hehee

Brakes: Std Calipers, RB74 Pads & DBA 4000 Rotors

Body weight: Me 65kg

2004 Wakefield Park

Engine: RB25DET, FMIC, Apexi Pod, Trust Cat Back Zorst

Power: 160RWKW

Suspension: Bilstein Shocks HKS Springs, Whiteline Swaybars F & R

Tyres: Falken Semi-Slicks

Brakes: Std Calipers, RB74 Pads & DBA 4000 Rotors

Body weight: 65kg

I personally think I can do better at both tracks, Wakefield is a track I was only getting used to when I fuxx0red my exhaust manifold. So I cant wait to have the car all sorted and get back to EC which is my favorite track by far. Wakefield is fun but EC is alot more fun. :rofl:

2003 Eastern Creek Mods

Engine:RB25DET (26DETT is for girls! hehe), HKS pod filter, Cat Back Exhaust.

Power: 140rwkw due to boost leak

Suspension: Bilstein Shocks HKS Springs

Tyres: Worn out simex baby! hehee

Brakes: Std Calipers, RB74 Pads & DBA 4000 Rotors

Body weight: Me 65kg  

Cool, your lapping about the same time as me with similar mods. Do you still have the speed limiter on your car? Im only askign as i want to know how realistic my goal for a 1:49.99 is with no speed limiter, good R compound rubber and a bit more power (approx220-250rwkws)

let me know how you go next time you go to Eastern with good rubber, keen to find out a time improvement from good rubber alone :rofl:

Yeah still the stock ECU.. I wont go back to EC until my car is sorted which includes new ECU, Cam Gear, Turbo sorted out, new coil packs and new semi slicks.. My next goal is 1:53ish which I think I can do.. I think there is 2-3 seconds in the change to good rubber as the simex I was using where thrashed.. I did 6 trackdays no 7 trackdays on them. The last 3 of which where just me sliding through corners..

  • 2 weeks later...

SAU Nickname: skylinegeoff

Car Make and Model: R33 GTS25t

Circuit Name: Phillip Island

Lap time: 1:58.5

Modifications

Engine: GTR fuel pump and rods, Arias Forged pistons

Power: 221rwkw

Suspension: Std shocks, RSR lowered springs, Whiteline adjustable swaybars, HICAS lock and pineapples

Tyres: Dunlop D01J

Brakes: Slotted front, plain rear, RB74 front pads

Body weight: 1470kg

SAU Nickname: skylinegeoff

Car Make and Model: R33 GTS25t

Circuit Name: Phillip Island

Lap time: 2:03.2 same day as above PIARC Group 5 sprint.

HSV Track day 19 Sept 04: 2:00.55 on the road rubber and lower boost.

Modifications

Tyres: Dunlop 9000 255 40 ZR17 rear and Continental Sport Contact 235 40 ZR17 front

Circuit Name: Sandown

Lap time: 1:36.1 speed limited to 190kmh :edit 24-10-04: new lap time 1:31.6. Hoped to go faster but for a slow M3 and even slower TVR Griff spoiling me for 4 flying laps straight.

SAU Nickname: Adzmax

Car Make and Model: 1999 ER34 GTT

Circuit Name: Phillip Island

Lap time: 1:58.04

Modifications

Engine: Bosche 975 Fuel pump, 10psi boost, Power FC, 3" turbo back exhaust, ARC Fount mount cooler, Oil cooler.

Power: 205rwkw

Suspension: Standard

Tyres: Dunlop D01J

Brakes: Standard

Body weight: 1400kg (claimed - yeah right)

  • 2 weeks later...

SAU Nickname: 88silhouette

Car Make and Model: Nissan R31 Skyline Silhouette SII

Circuit Name: Wakefield Park

Lap Time: 1m24s

Engine: RB30E

Power: About 70kW (the car is dying slowly)

Suspension: El cheapo Monroe Gas

Tyres: Worn out A539 Yokohamas

Brakes: Worn out

Body Weight: bout 1320

It was just a Wakefield Practice Day. Only 20 cars showed up during the day. Being N/A I thrashed the car for a long time that day. Go the stocker 31!!!

SAU Nickname: look over there <---

Car Make and Model: '93 GTS25t

Circuit Name: Eastern Creek

Lap time: ~2:03

Modifications

Engine: nil

Power: stock ~136rwkw

Suspension: stock and old! :uh-huh:

Tyres: 17" Dunlop FM901

Brakes: Ferodo DS2500 pads all round and DBA 4000 discs up front

Body weight: 1370kg (? stock)

SAU Nickname: Jimbo2000

Car Make and Model: R33 GTSt

Circuit Name: Oran Park

Lap time: 0:56.4600 :Oops:

Modifications

Power: 215rwkw

Suspension: stock

Tyres: hancook K104 300K's old still getting scrubbed in

Brakes: standard

Body weight: fatass

ok i suck, but i had fun ok!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...