Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, How strong is the Standard 5sp box and diff, driveshafts, etc in the R31?

I ask, as I am thinking of doing an rb30det conversion on an r31.

Would be running forged pistons, turbo mods etc, so realistically looking at 250+kw at the fly,

Will I destroy the running gear in short time? :flamed:

Honest answers required, as I dont want to have to switch to a 25det gearbox any time soon.

Thankyou,

Cameron McDonald

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46202-r31-aussie-5sp-drivetrain-strength/
Share on other sites

generally the "strength" of any component is less important than the manner in which it is used. If the question is can I multiply the power of the engine threefold, sidestep the clutch at 4,500 rpm and then flat change it through the cogs and have it survive the answer is NO. But if you are mechanically sympathetic and have some clues on advanced driving techniques that minimise damage to the more highly stressed drivetrain and the box was in good working order initially then the answer is probably YES.

There's a dude over here with a RB30et in his Aussie GTS2 and that has 374rwhp with the N/A 5 speed,brass button clutch and still going strong.

The torque this thing has is way to much as he can cruz at 100kph in 5th then give it some and off he goes sideways in 5th,sounds hard to beleive but it does it.

Bit of a waste post coz that box is a freak.

Yeah got to love his driving style :) but the reason why it has lasted so long is because he still has pretty standard tread, nothing special, last time i checked they definately were not over 225/ as soon as he gets some decent tyre size on there then bye bye gearbox.

But yes 374 rwhp and no wider than 225 tyres creates some awsome driving;)

A fella I know has a 240z race car with a VG30DET and 200KW @ the wheels, He runs a non turbo gearbox, I wouldn't say he abuses it but it does get a work out. As far as I know its stood up to the power, the importance would be not to put too much torque thru the higher gears, change down out of fifth!

I ran an rb30et that hit over 200rwkw and I was using the stock Rb30 na manual box which was over 330,000 km old.

I have just got the rb26 running and am using the stock box for now, so I will find out the strength of the box real fast!!!

As for diffs. I only broke the spider gears on one diff. I belive there is a harlequin R31 running 10's? I spoke to the owner last year and he was still using the stock diff, just with a minni spool.

250kw+ fly? if you are going for an rb30det with forged pistons and things 300rwkw (maybe 400kw fly) should be easy. Thats going to tear most things apart :P If you wanted 250rwkw just put get the bottom end converted to VL turbo pistons.

i think the torque would grind it pretty quickly. Apparently RB30e box and RB20DET box are very similar strength.. Some have killed their rb20det boxes at 180rwkw, others have got 250rwkw. So like people have said, its how you drive it and a bit of luck thrown in.

A diff specialist also told me similar about the borg warner diffs.. might make heaps of noise and not real too fancy.. but good for quite a big amount hp.

The only real weak link in any R31 is the tailshaft and diff. (Both ozzie made) Treat the Standard box nice, and it will be OK, a Series 3 manual box is stronger than a series 1/2 manual box. But if you want to have a car you don't have to worry about, no matter what, put a VL Turbo Box in or a RB25 Box, and a one piece tailshaft. Howdy by the way DVS-JET.

Thanks for the replies guys, Still unsure about the project, just doing some thinking at this stage.

Predator, I would rather use the forged pistons, as the VL turbo pistons will create a very low compression ratio with the twin cam head (7:1? or so)= monster lag.

I work for Repco, so buying a new set of forgies and doing the bottom end properly would be slightly(i hope) more affordable for me compared to the average joe off the street.

How well would the standard rb25det turbo go on this combo, what sort of boost could it generate without disintegrating the ceramic turbine wheel?

Basically the idea is to take a stock r31, build the bottom end nice and strong, get an r33 gtst halfcut, slap on the head, wiring loom turbo, etc straight in.

Then take it from there, if more horses are desired.

Obviously if the r33 rb25det halfcut is a manual, I would use the box out of it, but I have a friend who has an r33 gtst with an auto on the way out, so the idea would be to go halvies, I take the head, turbo, loom,efi sys.

He gets the block, auto and rack,etc,etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...