Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

As promised here is a copy of my install notes. Water temp is external as I found the OEM sensor signal to skew when tapped.

Innovate LC-2 wide band is used for narrow band emulation and EMU autotune

Vehicle setup: VQ25DE OR VQ35DE

Speed pulse: TBA(think it was 16pulse, 21% correction)

If someone has spare time and wants to put this info in a neat spreadsheet please go ahead.

Matt

post-49288-14532520652612_thumb.jpgpost-49288-14532520809067_thumb.jpg

Edited by BoostdR
  • Like 3

I have the knock sensor connected however there is no pickup in the logs, even when I can hear the knock. Doesn't look like the EMU is compatible with the M35 sensor. Happy to be corrected

Which MAP sensor did you get? The Chinese version is very noisy on boost. I'll be changing mine as I run MAFLESS

I have the knock sensor connected however there is no pickup in the logs, even when I can hear the knock. Doesn't look like the EMU is compatible with the M35 sensor. Happy to be corrected

Which MAP sensor did you get? The Chinese version is very noisy on boost. I'll be changing mine as I run MAFLESS

No.71 on ECU pin is for knock sensor but i never try to test the signal.

i got genuine greddy map sensor from Japan with all other genuine harness, not chinese one.

ECU_PINOUTS 13_12_10.PDF

M35_CONNECTOR_PINOUTS.pdf

post-137368-0-65509300-1453258787_thumb.jpg

Nice. I'll be interested to see the log for the map sensor to see how stable it is on boost. I tee'd off the first fuel pressure reg feed for the smoothest signal. Still crap with my Chinese MAP. Moves up and down 4-6psi at 26psi.

Yes I have pin 71 for the knock sensor connected. Doesn't work for me. Tried most frequencies from 6-7khz

Here are the speed settings

Edited by BoostdR

Rev limiter moved to 7500. You need to change the rev limiter unit setting to duration whilst leaving the injection unit on % duty cycle so the autotune still works.

No more bouncing of the limiter when it doesn't want to change from first to second :))

http://youtu.be/JoqG6Fw10nc

900cc Bosch. E85

post-49288-1453775552236_thumb.jpg

Edited by BoostdR
  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...

Does CEL pop up with an emanage hooked up..?

Is the daughter board separate normally?

Also- what did you use your analogue output for?

If we tapped that into the throttle position, would it be possible to open loop that so the brake cut mod wouldn't be required?

Just throwing ideas.

Does CEL pop up with an emanage hooked up..?

Is the daughter board separate normally?

Also- what did you use your analogue output for?

If we tapped that into the throttle position, would it be possible to open loop that so the brake cut mod wouldn't be required?

Just throwing ideas.

for ignition daughter board, it is separate board as an optional part for EMU, to avoid ignition CEL.

Welcome. If anyone needs a emanage ultimate I have a spare one which also has the ignition daughter board which stops the check engine light.

i have EMU and daughter board, i am wondering if you can share some picture that how to plug the daughter board into EMU. :)

Welcome. If anyone needs a emanage ultimate I have a spare one which also has the ignition daughter board which stops the check engine light.

What's the go with the daughter board? I haven't heard of that before! Costs?

I picked up an EMU a few years ago, I found it again only recently - I really need to get around to getting it installed and finally tuned! Have you fitted one to anyone elses apart from yours? Would you like to? :P

What's the go with the daughter board? I haven't heard of that before! Costs?

I picked up an EMU a few years ago, I found it again only recently - I really need to get around to getting it installed and finally tuned! Have you fitted one to anyone elses apart from yours? Would you like to? :P

just a small patch board for EMU, RRP 1300YEN, quite cheap.

PN 15951500

i just took some pics:

post-137368-0-82342400-1456277877_thumb.jpg

post-137368-0-44541600-1456277881_thumb.jpg

post-137368-0-58979700-1456277890_thumb.jpg

post-137368-0-40449800-1456277894_thumb.jpg

post-137368-0-61721600-1456277897_thumb.jpg

post-137368-0-37838100-1456277898_thumb.jpg

Edited by YangLIU

What's the go with the daughter board? I haven't heard of that before! Costs?

I picked up an EMU a few years ago, I found it again only recently - I really need to get around to getting it installed and finally tuned! Have you fitted one to anyone elses apart from yours? Would you like to? :P

Yes. Also fitted one to a mates Stag. I'm pretty busy these days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
    • Messing with narrowband switchovers is a terrible bandaid. I don't want to think about it. You are a cam "upgrader" only in concept. As you said, your new cam is actually smaller, so it's technically a downgrade. OK, likely a very small downgrade, but nevertheless. But the big thing that will be the most likely suspect is the change of the advance angle. That change could be equivalent to a substantial decrease in cam lobe duration. I haven't gone to the effort of trying to think about what your change would actually cause. But until someone (you, me (unlikely), Matt, someone else) does so and comes to a conclusion about the effect, it remains a possibility that that is the change that is causing what you're seeing.
    • The previous switchover point was 501mv. The stock value is like ~360. They now were idling at about ~880. The thing is, most people get a false lean condition. I am getting false rich conditions. This isn't a quirk of terminology, most cam upgraders get awful fuel economy because the O2's read false lean and add fuel - Mine are attempting to aggressively subtract fuel.
    • So... the whole idea was to upgrade the power of the motor from stock. The motor I bought with the gearbox had 'some' stuff done to it in the past, but it wasn't as well thought out/what I had wanted to do. The stock heads typically are a big restriction on LS's and need porting to unlock quite a lot of power. You can then go a bit silly with aftermarket castings to get more, aftermarket intake manifolds for a little more, and then porting those for more. <- We are here. Nobody in Australia really goes down this path (for some reason). It might* make 3kw or something more than doing things the tried and true path for 10X the cost. So that's probably why - I wouldn't even recommend it to people, the money was and is likely better spent on just CNC'ing the stock heads and putting a 6.3L stroker kit in. I didn't want to go down the 'normal' path and then think: But if I'd just done a bit more - I could have had a slightly better result. I assumed the heads were running out of flow and it always annoyed me - Turns out the previous installer advanced the cam 6 degrees so this is likely why it was coming on earlier and running out of puff earlier than advertised. The body panels were just lack of planning/no information on this anywhere on the internet and the fact they came out different was annoying. From test fitting the guard it appears I could have gotten away with GTR guards only, but I got the bonnet and raisers and everything else as well for a pretty decent package deal.
×
×
  • Create New...