Jump to content
SAU Community

Bcnr33 Wheel Fitment Help!


Recommended Posts

Not much info about this on the net, tried GTR.co.uk and no one could help me. My question is will (F: 19×10.5J -3mm; R:19×10.5J -3mm) on 275/35 fit on a BCNR33 thats no too low (coilovers) and has heavily rolled guard front and back? Also have V36 discs if that matters.

Active garage did (F: 19×10.5J -1mm; R:19×10.5J -3mm) on a BNR32.

Nissan-Skyline-GTR-R32-21.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't have thought 19x10.5 -1 would fit on 32 GTR. I have 18x10 +15 or +18 can't remember, and they are just inline with the guards on my 32.

33 guards are bigger but I think you would need a bit negative camber to make the above sizes fit. Could be wrong tho....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes i did, didn't see anyone put -3 offset 10,5J 19's on a BCNR33! Nothing even close to that spec!

That was kind of my point. If you look at the biggest, most negative offset wheels that people have managed to fit on a 33GTR and look at the words around the post, like "rolled guards", "tight squeeze", "negative camber" and so on, you can probably work out what the likelihood of achieving your goal is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was kind of my point. If you look at the biggest, most negative offset wheels that people have managed to fit on a 33GTR and look at the words around the post, like "rolled guards", "tight squeeze", "negative camber" and so on, you can probably work out what the likelihood of achieving your goal is.

Been trying, not really seen anything beyond 10.5j +11. Active recently did 11j on a BCNR33, sadly they won't say what the offset is, guarding that info that like they are nuclear launch code's!!

70_o.jpg

So this the Active Garage car i'm talking about and the look and rims i wan't. I know this car has Z-tune guard but mine are pulled to around this spec.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are dead set on a certain diameter and width of wheel/tyre combination you can work out the offset for yourself.

Buy a set of tyres in the size you want. Remove a wheel, support the axle with a jack and put the tyre in as far as it will go until you are sure it will not foul the suspension under any circumstances.

Measure the offset.

Bolt the dream wheels on and modify the guards (not the suspension) to suit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will stick out of guards, pump/flare or get stancenation points by running 235 wide tyres and -5° camber.

Don't plan on doing that, 275 tire's like the one above. Already found a BCNR33 Running 10.5 -1 with minimal Camber and 265's and his guard were hardly pulled compared to how mine are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

265's don't belong on a 10.5 wide rim, they're a 9.5 ideally or 10.0 wide maximum. 10.5's should be run on 285 or 295's.

All because the wheel is on the car, doesn't mean it fits. Compromising on the correct tyre width to run a wide wheel or silly offset is crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 265/35/18 Dunlop 03Gs im running are rated by the manufacturer as fine for 10.5s (but that is the limit). I checked a few others and they were also ok, but OP will need to do his own checks since he's running 19s.

Agree with comment about getting the right wheel tho - my rims are +25 and rub on the outside of the guard liners near the guard lip at the track. Yeah its a 32, but does a 33 have 28mm more space?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 265/35/18 Dunlop 03Gs im running are rated by the manufacturer as fine for 10.5s (but that is the limit). I checked a few others and they were also ok, but OP will need to do his own checks since he's running 19s.

Agree with comment about getting the right wheel tho - my rims are +25 and rub on the outside of the guard liners near the guard lip at the track. Yeah its a 32, but does a 33 have 28mm more space?

33's can handle around 10mm more, and the rubbing just means your car is sitting pretty low. And that active garage BNR32 i posted proves that 32's can handle low offset. Anyhow my guards were rolled heavily by the previous owner, running 9.5j with 265's currently with unknown offset and 3cm spacers! :( Just after that look that active garage has on their GTR's, just need to figure out what that is. Its got to be more that -1 on 10.5j because they have that on the BNR32 so the Black BCNR33 has to be even lower offset. Also bought a set of roll centre adjusters and cusco camber arms if i need to dial in some negative camber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

265's don't belong on a 10.5 wide rim, they're a 9.5 ideally or 10.0 wide maximum. 10.5's should be run on 285 or 295's.

All because the wheel is on the car, doesn't mean it fits. Compromising on the correct tyre width to run a wide wheel or silly offset is crazy.

Mate, don't you know the stancenation rules? Tyre shoulders must be sitting at least 2cm inside the wheel lip.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mate, don't you know the stancenation rules? Tyre shoulders must be sitting at least 2cm inside the wheel lip.

I pretty much hate stance, not after that. Just to fill out my guards while using 275 on 10.5j what can be hardly seen as any kind of tire strech. Would maybe consider 285 but my prefered tire doesn't come in that size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A7A989A9-FF5A-4259-B61D-7862A46A33A6_zps

Te 37 10.0 + 20 with a 265/35x18 tyre on a R33 GTR. That is without hektik camber to try put a square block into a round hole.

10.0+ 12 with the same tyre, the rear will rub under hard acceleration and hitting a dip in the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on.
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...