Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone. There is something that has been bugging the shit out of me.

I've been looking at the return hole in a few fuel pressure regulators and they are f**king tiny.

This is my issue - I had one reg, I would set the base at 300kpa. Then this happened.

3 Pump speeds, car was idling. I have a walbro 460lph pump. (low = 10v, medium = 14v, high = 16.2v)

Pressures at idle:
Low = 300kpa
Medium = 340kpa

High = 380kpa

Return line was in a bucket to rule out everything else.

So I bought a newer better quality reg - Turbo Smart 1200hp (I run E85). The hole is still tiny! it is about 3/16.

If there is a shit load of flow needing to get back to the tank, this little hole isn't going to do it. I don't understand the design. I called turbosmart and the guy I spoke to knew his stuff. But he said that they've tried bigger holes and had issues so they went to a smaller hole again.

When I log my fuel pressure, you can see the pressure jumping when the pump changes speeds.



Is someone able to shed some light on this for me? How does this tiny return port work and why it needs to be so small / or if its meant to be bigger?

Thanks

Not sure i understand the issue. The bigger the hole the harder the pump would have to work to maintain pressure so any bigger than needed would not be good. If the pump volume changes at set intervals, eg set rpm or throttle position, the tune would accommodate this?

Do an orifice flow calculation for a 3/16" hole with 4 bar of pressure drop across it.

You will need the density of the fuel and an estimate of the Cd of the orifice. I'd start with 0.8 as a guess.

See how much fuel you can squeeze through the hole.

A fuel pressure regulator does not work the way you played with it.

Turn up the pump voltage and expect the pressure to rise, then readjust your regulator to bring it down to where you need it.

It does not automatically self adjust itself at base pressure, put more pressure VIA the pump and you need to adjust the base back down again.

Test it at all voltages again, while adjusting the reg, whats the min and max pressure it will hold? Pretty wide in all cases and within its working limits?

A fuel pressure regulator does not work the way you played with it.

Turn up the pump voltage and expect the pressure to rise, then readjust your regulator to bring it down to where you need it.

Um.....actually, it is supposed to do exactly as Mafia expects, and not as you suggest. That is the whole point of the word "regulator". Spring on one side of a diaphragm, fluid pressure on the other, balance each other and move the needle in/on the seat to open and close the orifice so as to maintain pressure where it is set. The setting adjusts the set point, not the absolute opening of the valve.

okay so I should be able to turn up the pump to full speed and still be at 300kpa? Or is there a careful balance with the size of the hole and flow? Surely when flowing 1200hp worth of fuel this tiny little hole is becoming a restriction at lower rpm?

The issue is if I set the base pressure at full pump speed, then when at medium and low the base pressure is well under 300kpa.

Obviously any given pressure regulator will have a maximum flow that it can "bypass". A regulator with an orifice too small to bypass all the flow required will of course be unable to control the pressure when fuel load demand is low - hence the pressure will rise above set point (until the delta P across the reg is enough to force the extra flow through). A big(ger) regulator that has a bigger orifice in it may not be able to control fuel pressure as well when the reg is nearly closed (ie at engine loads where a lot of fuel is being used) because the valve will be on and off the seat rather than smoothly controlling.

That's why it's important to get the sizing of a regulator (for any pressure control application) correct. At least with fuel pressure regs on petrol engines it seems like we can get away with not having to be too picky. After all, the range of power outputs we're talking about (and hence the range of fuel flows needing control of) is only in the range of 100 - 500 HP for the most part. That's a range of only half an order of magnitude and it is quite possible that you only need 1 or 2 different sizes of regulator to span that range. In industrial situations, I might have to design a diesel valve train for a burner that is only a few hundred kW, and I might have to design one that is 50 MW. That's a range of at least 2 orders of magnitude - hence you have to carefully size and specify the reg to get the combination of flow capacity and pressure control you need.

Mine was doing the same thing, but I have no issues with my evo now I drilled the vac generator on the side of the pump housing to 4mm. It's not the reg as I use the same Turbosmart 1200.

Is the tank lid all stock, or do you have an aftermarket setup?

I tested mine with the return line into a 20L bottle to eliminate the venturi / jet pump.

I over did it and bought a radium engineering venturi for $120. It has 3 changeable nozzles, <250lph, 250-500lph, and >500lph

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...