Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

before I get flamed about this I am very aware of the potential damage a Bee*R limiter can cause to components

of my engine, however it is not a standard rb25 and am more than happy to fit one as I don't have a PFC pro.

I bought a second hand Bee*R limiter recently and have just installed it but it will not work correctly,

I've looked up countless posts about fitting them and I just can't see what I've done wrong at all.

I have only "spliced" into two wires of the ECU loom and are using separate 12v + grounds as the

PFC has a grounding issue with the Bee*R.

The wires are set up as follows:

YELLOW - spliced into pin 41 on ECU (crank 120)

GREEN - spliced into pin 42 of ECU (crank 1)

RED - spliced into 12v on radio

BLACK - spliced into ground of cig lighter

WHITE - spliced into handbrake wire

BROWN LOOP - did not cut

GREY LOOP - did not cut

The issue I am getting is that the Bee*R will turn on (red LED stays lit solid while car is on) but no matter what setting, handbrake up or

down, it will not hit the limiter. It's as if the Bee*R was not there at all but it is obviously receiving power as it is lighting the LED up on the unit.

Tried swtitching the yellow and green wires around with no luck, the car would start and run as normal but the Bee*R unit would not light

the LED up.

I have no idea what the next step might be, I've taken the unit apart (I don't know too much about electrical boards) and cant see any obvious

signs of damage to the board at all so I'm a bit confused, the only other thing i can possibly think of is the actual Bee*R unit itself isn't working

properly and is damaged?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

Edited by Jaydn_033
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/462579-beer-limiter-for-rb25-pfc-help/
Share on other sites

My suggestion is to get a proper ECU with adjustable retard and adjustable RPM ignition and / or fuel cut for your bang bang.

I have what you're trying to achieve governed by my vehicle speed so no silly handbrake needed.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...