Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Never fear, Bob is here!

The part number is 24431-18V21 and yes I got if direct from NISSAN.

This is for the bigger Australian sized battery. The OEM Japanese ones are smaller.

The correct battery (right terminals) I bought that fits in the box is a Century Maintenance Free (Part Number) NS60MF.

Paid about $150.00 from Battery World.

Cheers,

Bob.

  • Like 1

Never fear, Bob is here!

The part number is 24431-18V21 and yes I got if direct from NISSAN.

This is for the bigger Australian sized battery. The OEM Japanese ones are smaller.

The correct battery (right terminals) I bought that fits in the box is a Century Maintenance Free (Part Number) NS60MF.

Paid about $150.00 from Battery World.

Cheers,

Bob.

Wow superhero entrance lol

Thanks heaps ay Bob [emoji106]

Bought a yuasa battery from Battery World today for $159 which seems normal I guess and it was a better fit than the one that came out.

it seems a tiny bit smaller as the edges of the corners tend to split the plastic on all the other batteries.

Thanks again mate[emoji106]

Just quickly Google that part number and it saves the Nissan Laurel has the same battery cover which isn't uncommon but what was the surprise is it's 19 us dollars.

http://jp-carparts.com/nissan/part_detail.php?maker=nissan&type=23&cartype=48&fig=244∂=2443118V21&page=1&img=244=%20001

Just quickly Google that part number and it saves the Nissan Laurel has the same battery cover which isn't uncommon but what was the surprise is it's 19 us dollars.

http://jp-carparts.com/nissan/part_detail.php?maker=nissan&type=23&cartype=48&fig=244∂=2443118V21&page=1&img=244=%20001

Correct......... I bought one from Nissan for about $30.00 Aussie.

JP-Car Parts are fine...... I have bought from them previously but remember there will be freight charge on top. Nissan locally will be cheaper all up.

Compare the battery you bought by size with the battery I recommended, they may be different thus the cover may be too big.

Ring battery World and ask them to check the size comparisons.

I got caught out by this once before as the Japanese OEM batteries are a fair bit smaller.

Bob.

  • 2 weeks later...

Anyone know where I can get a battery hold down? I need the entire setup, in other words the top bar and the vertical "hook" too. When I imported my car, they stole my Nismo Strut bars F&R along with the battery and the entire hold down assembly of all things...

Thanks you ! I have searched everywhere and always come up with a part number for OEM Nissan, but No description..

Next issue lol, I ordered a single 6466 kit from Goleby and did the entire transaction through email due to not being able to call Australia. Any chance they have a website or email address?

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 6 years later...
On 10/2/2016 at 5:52 AM, Aussie_Delivered_R32_GTR said:

Correct......... I bought one from Nissan for about $30.00 Aussie.

JP-Car Parts are fine...... I have bought from them previously but remember there will be freight charge on top. Nissan locally will be cheaper all up.

Compare the battery you bought by size with the battery I recommended, they may be different thus the cover may be too big.

Ring battery World and ask them to check the size comparisons.

I got caught out by this once before as the Japanese OEM batteries are a fair bit smaller.

Bob.

Hey mate, wondering if you have the dimensions for battery cover at all? I have the Bnr34 battery tray in the trunk and trying to find the right one, if one fits for this setup. Epc data and Amayama list one for gtt but not GTR, but curious if there’s any that will actually fit this setup.   Thanks 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...