Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you were to state your vehicle, then using "per tank" is fine as its consistent.

actually its not fine, fuel gauges are not very accurate and i would hope you don't run it dry so you are really just having a wild guess. You might still have 150km of fuel left in the tank when you fill up..

best bet to record your odo and litres needed to fill up over a period of time and work it out from that.

Without getting pedantic, the easiest way to collect data is to knock up an Excel spreadsheet.

Enter litres and K's at every fill.

Doesn't matter if it's 15 litres or 50 litres, same for the k's, just keep entering the data.

Your average will get tighter the more data you input.

But it's a Skyline, you know from your wallet if it's chewing juice excessively.

  • Like 1

km to a tank is a horse shit method.

Working our your fuel consumption is so easy:

1) Grow a brain

2) Fill up

3) Look at how many litres you put in

4) Look at how many km on the trip meter

5) Consumption = Litres divided by kilometers multiplied by 100.

6) Reset trip meter and keep on driving, satisfied that finally you understand what the f**k is going on

Eg 55L and trip meter shows 415km. 55 / 415 * 100 = 13.25L/100km

My last tank was 12.7L/100km city cycle.

96-98 RON, 300rwkw GT3076 with WMI kit blah blah, I went to the GC and back [round trip of from memory 1700km] with mainly highway driving but also had a day in Sydney and a few drives around the GC and I averaged just under 9.8l/100km.

But your motor is a lazy straight 6 until you boost it. At 110km/hr it is just in the brink of boosting and hard drinking - good actually, I know when I speed because the turbo starts whistling at me!!!!

And I kept a notebook for it, just so I could check, haven't really done it since - my burning curiosity was sated.

OP your fuel figures are crap, get a proper tune.

380km to "a tank" - filling up early and putting 50L in it = 13.15L/100km

compared with 380km to "a tank" and putting 58L in it (almost dry) = 15.2L/100km

15% difference, we're a long way from NASA

P.S. My car does 55 LOLs per WOW. +/- 30% :cheers:

  • Like 1

You'll get more economy if you lean more on the timing around cruise and take the AFR past stoich.

I managed to get mine doing about 9L/100km going up to Forster.

What you need to remember though if you go past stoich you'll decrease power and torque, richer mixers produce more torque.

Ideally you want to tune where pedal effort is minimum for a certain rpm and you're doing the same speed.

380km to "a tank" - filling up early and putting 50L in it = 13.15L/100km

compared with 380km to "a tank" and putting 58L in it (almost dry) = 15.2L/100km

15% difference, we're a long way from NASA

But that argument only holds true if you are not using multiple fills like on a longer road trip.

Im with the fuel Nazi on this one. Kms "to a tank" is useless and lazy. If you want to make any claims or conclusions based off your consumption you need accurate data in the first place. Ive heard some pretty wild numbers over the years like 150 or 250km "to a tank", putting you in the 20-30L/100km range

  • Like 1

There are too many variables to fuel economy.

Someone who drives 20ks to work in a non congested 60-90kph will get far better fuel economy than someone who drives 20kmph in a congested 60kmph section.

Someone who starts their car and drives straight into 90kmph will get worse fuel economy than someone who can get their car up to temp and out of enrichment at a leisurely pace.

Temperature plays a huge role too.

Comparing fuel economy to someone who drives different roads than you is pointless.

I moved from the coast where I was getting 12l/100 to the act where I was getting 14l/100 because of the location and roads.

I get about 220km to a tank.

Tank being 50L. Driving being a mix of highway and day to day traffic.

My AFR on cruise is about 16:1.

Your guess is as good as mine lol.

I get about 220km to a tank.

Tank being 50L. Driving being a mix of highway and day to day traffic.

My AFR on cruise is about 16:1.

Your guess is as good as mine lol.

How many lols per wow is that? I mean l/100km?

I get about 220km to a tank.

Tank being 50L. Driving being a mix of highway and day to day traffic.

My AFR on cruise is about 16:1.

Your guess is as good as mine lol.

You better start buying bp shares[emoji12]

I get about 220km to a tank.

Tank being 50L. Driving being a mix of highway and day to day traffic.

My AFR on cruise is about 16:1.

Your guess is as good as mine lol.

A lean AFR may not mean its actually using a small amount of fuel. Unburnt fuel in the exhaust would still read as a lean condition. So that could mean poor injector timing, poor fuel atomisation etc..

Otherwise the timing is just way too retarded for that AFR.

I get about 220km to a tank.

Tank being 50L. Driving being a mix of highway and day to day traffic.

My AFR on cruise is about 16:1.

Your guess is as good as mine lol.

It's because his foot doesn't understand anything but throttle 0% or throttle 100%

The last car i tuned managed to double the factory power output at the wheels and went from stock ecu with 13psi 260km to 280km around town 330km highway. Made 153 wkw

To 22psi 450km to 460km around town to 550km to 580km was my absolute best driving to Melbourne!

street tuned but amlost maxed out the Z32 afm est 250 to 260wkw

was so excited about the 580km i almost came unstuck on the Monaro Highway in The National Park.

best way to test your fuel economy is to run out of fuel completely I guess.

Those bends tho[emoji3]

On twice the power output.

Tune was safe as and could be bashed on no matter how hot it was outside.

Edited by mr skidz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
    • I like this page, better than that silly turbo kit   https://v8roadsters.com/product-category/engine-conversions/engine-conversion-lsx/engine-conversion-lsx-nc/  
    • That would be my Shoei helmet
×
×
  • Create New...