Jump to content
SAU Community

Gtr-registry.com: Now All R32/r33/r34 Gtr Details - Full Registry - Submit Photos/info


Recommended Posts

I've spent some time looking over what's there and you're right - it's not correct.

It's a bit confusing so if anyone can help that would be great - I'd love to get it correct.

So the information is in the 2 following images: First is a general explanation:

Second is the info

Now the 2 parts of model codes we are interested in are:

LM AA

LM ZG

L= projector headlamp

M = P = Climate control air con

= Q = Optional sound system

From the left table

Then there's

AA which is both cold weather package (not listed above but should be)

ZG

Well Z doesn't even exist on the middle table.

G = B + D

Do we then take both left and right column of B and D, or only the right (or left?)

B(left) = ABS

B(right) = GT-R steering wheel

D(left) = GT auto spoiler (front lip)

D(right) = viscous LSD

Then if GTR steering wheel is listed here, why is it not listed in AA? Surely they have all the same steering wheel :)

Thoughts?

Edit: It's been pointed out to me the preceding LM and LT are more R32-specific, the AA/ZG/ZH are BNR32-specific. Hence the various Auto Spoiler, Steering Wheel etc. translations don't apply here, they're for GTS (and GTS-t) models.

Not sure how best to leave the translations.

What's even more confusing is apparently there was 15,000 R32 GTR's with MZG... So how can there be no info on it?

I have spent hours previously trying to figure out what it means but i couldn't find anything.

post-95792-0-71432000-1459860691.jpg

Feature Car of the Week: Itchigo from Norway's mint condition QM1 White R34 GTR is this week's Feature Car of the Week.

Updated R34 GTR Colours page to show 39 known V-Spec N1s. Number of Unknown R34 GTR cars reducded from 22 to 21.

2x R34 GTR added by readers to Registry now updated in VIN table.

2x R33 GTR added by readers to Registry now updated in VIN table.

1x R32 GTR added by readers to Registry now updated in VIN table.

  • Like 2

post-95792-0-07117200-1460457427.jpg

Feature Car of the Week: Sully from UK's ultra rare R33 Nismo 400R #40.
About the Registry
2x R33 GTR (4 total) added by readers to Registry now updated in VIN table.
6x R32 GTR (9 total) added by readers to Registry now updated in VIN table (including 3 NISMO GTR versions).
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Released the German version (thanks to andreasgtr for the translations) and Japanese version of the site.

Also made a few other minor updates.

  • Like 1

Back to the cold weather package:

For R34 GTR can confirm from Nissan documentation:

Wiper de-icer
Heated door mirrors
Heavy duty battery
Better heater
Different coolant
寒冷地仕様(ワイパーデアイサー、ヒーター付電動格納式リモコンカラードドアミラー、寒冷地用高性能バッテリー、寒冷地仕様クーラント、強化ヒーター)

Bob: I'll see what I can find tonight.

Anthony: My friend Cam who has been helping a lot, he thinks

"I can only come to the conclusion that AA means no rear wiper, ZG means it has a rear wiper.".

But I removed the notes for the time being as I'm still not 100% sure...

I did actually look through 50+ auction results trying to find an AA car with a photo of rear windscreen but no luck.

Might have another go tonight if I get some free time.

Cheers

  • Like 1

Bob: I'll see what I can find tonight.

Anthony: My friend Cam who has been helping a lot, he thinks

"I can only come to the conclusion that AA means no rear wiper, ZG means it has a rear wiper.".

But I removed the notes for the time being as I'm still not 100% sure...

I did actually look through 50+ auction results trying to find an AA car with a photo of rear windscreen but no luck.

Might have another go tonight if I get some free time.

Cheers

I'm not sure if this helps.........

http://www.carpoint.com.au/all-cars/private/details.aspx?R=SSE-AD-3716749&Cr=0

AA car with rear wiper!

Bob.

Couldn't find any info on mine....................BNR32-001323

BNR32-001323
KBNR32RXFSLMZG
GTR (Series 1)
1989-09 KH2
Gun Grey Metallic
Try typing 001323 in to the search box.
BNR32-001323
KBNR32RXFSLMZG
GTR (Series 1)
1989-09 KH2
Gun Grey Metallic
Try typing 001323 in to the search box.

ahhhh, there you go, much appreciated sin-

basically everything I knew.

second line with this MZG at the end, seems I fall into that group of people.....

Honestly I think mzg just means it's effectively a bog stock series 1? And they didn't need the extra letters hence they did mzg as like a place holder code. I have gone over my car top to bottom and I can't find anything special.

  • Like 1

Honestly I think mzg just means it's effectively a bog stock series 1? And they didn't need the extra letters hence they did mzg as like a place holder code. I have gone over my car top to bottom and I can't find anything special.

ye think I'd have to agree, a special 1 in 15,000 ;)

Yes but surely there's some difference between

LMAA

LMZG

LMZH

LTAA

LTZG

The other issue I'm having is regarding the Options column. Originally with just the R34 GTR that idea was to just list what "options" the car had. Ie Side airbags, since for example all cars have rear wiper and super fine hard coat (except for N1s..). But when it comes to cars, it's more a spec than an option (ie series 3 front bar for R33 GTR is on all Series 3s). But should it be listed? It's not really an option if it's on all, but it's not on series 1 and 2 cars. So I could change Options to specs, then the list would becomes quite long (especially for R34 GTR) and then it would be a bit hard to see the differences and what was actually "optioned" ....

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
    • You reckon? I have to disagree. Notwithstanding that at some point we may all be forced to do this to our cars if we want to keep driving them, there is absolutely nothing about an electric-converted-previously-IC-car that is ever good. EVs that are built by OEMs on platforms that were originally IC already suck, let alone the shitty outcomes that result from doing it as a retro to something that was actually built as an IC car. This is because the platform really needs to be designed to house the battery in a useful place (ie, down as low as possible) and the motors are properly located relative to the wheels that they have to drive. Converted platforms already suck at this. But when you try to shove sufficient battery capacity into a previously IC car, you can't put it down on/in the floor, because that space doesn't exist. You can't find enough space where the fuel tank used to be (if it is an inboard fuel tank) and you don't want to hang it out behind the rear axle line if you had a rear fuel tank. And there's not enough space in the tunnel if you still want to use it for anything remotely like what it was originally used for. The engine bay is too big for a motor, and you'd really prefer that the motor for the rear wheels wasn't in the front engine bay anyway. And there's not enough room where the diff was for a proper man-sized E motor. And then.... there is the complete lack of soul and emotion that is provided by EVs. There are some cracking restomods out there. Like the Alfaholics GTA thingo. But it is petrol powered. Look at the alternative EV version of a GTA restomod by Totem. it is jaw droppingly beautiful. But by all reports is is objectively awful to drive, despite having 600 HP or something, simply because there is nothing there. It sounds like a sewing machine or a leaf blower. It should scream and wail and make the hairs on your neck stand up. Oh, and it's 1500 bloody kg in a car that was <900kg when new. GTRs are heavy enough as it is without pushing them up to 2tonnes worth of pork.
    • https://www.dezeen.com/2025/01/06/nissan-electric-r32-skyline-gt-r-godzilla-sports-car/   I reckon this is pretty cool. Lots of other Resto mods have turned to ev power.
    • hahaha @joshuaho96 the most action it gets is when I have to drive from West to SE VIC to meet the fam. Even then, it;s on highway cruising speeds
    • don't know anyone in this thread, but i just found it, read the entire thing in a few hours, realized greg is still posting progress, and just have to say, this is awesome. it looks awesome. 100% right about the Uras kit making it a pain to get on hoists...have the same kit on my 34 and it takes six 2x4s and race ramps to do it without taking parts off. this reminds me exactly of this thread. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/r63-amg-the-unicorn-of-my-destruction/110824/page8/
×
×
  • Create New...