Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I've gone a slightly different route with boost control on low mounts and am using a pair of turbonetics 30326 dual port wastegates on my HKS2530s and a 4 port MAC valve to suit.

2975.jpg

idea is I can run very low boost pressure in Mrs/valet mode (preload will only be around 7.5psi) but can wind in 26+psi on E85. also, having the 4 port solenoid will assist in keeping the gates clamped closed until the ECU says otherwise.

my options for the boost source for the solenoid (which is located on the passenger strut right beside the turbos) are:

1) Tap each turbo and join with a Y piece into the wastegate solenoid.

2) Tap into the intercooler piping just after the twin-turbo pipe (which has the splitter mod done)

3) Just use the signal from the intake manifold pre-throttle plates.

my considerations are: shorter hose length and closer to the turbos = better control. I figured the faster pressure response would be a good thing when the solenoid is directing pressure to the back of the actuators to keep them shut during spool

the idea is to obtain optimum boost control with agressive ramp-on.

inter cooler is a 120mm Greddy unit, so I'm not expecting significant pressure drop over it.

boost control is being done per gear, with the TPS% position generating a MAP target with an Ethanol content modifier. so 100% thottle may be 20psi on petrol but 27psi on E85.

that map target is then used in a target MAP vs RPM table that dictates the waste gate duty cycle to achieve pressure target. also under WOT conditions closed loop correction activates using PID control for minor corrections.

the ultimate would be to use two separate solenoids, one for each turbo with its own reference but you would need to monitor turbo speeds to make the most of it I think.

Edited by burn4005

The difference between 1&2 would be so small as to be unnoticeable so do whatever comes easiest out of those 2. The chances that either of them would offer you noticeably different control characteristic compared to sourcing it from the plenum are probably not much larger, but on the basis of paranoia simply rule out option 3 because it means more pipework.

  • 2 months later...

Hi mate, slightly off topic but have you actually got the twin port wastegates hooked up in the car currently? no clearance issues at all and bolt straight onto t25/t28 frame turbos with the stock bracket? i'm looking at doing the same thing ( running the 4 port solenoid) thanks!

luckily I had HKS actuators, and they are bolted to the bracket rather than welded on (I think the garrett ones are welded to the backet, so won't work):

nengun-240692-00-hks-hks_strengthened_ac

and the turbonetics ones also have the two bolts in the same place.

tnt-30326_w.jpg

they went in with a fair bit of swearing, but only an hour or so work. the support rods on the HKS brackets are in the way when you're trying to get a ring spanner on the actuator bolts, but got there in the end. rear actuator ports point outwards, front actuator ports point inwards so they don't foul the intake piping.

2c2aa82fd400ccb163ff82bdacf6c524.jpg

3c6f3e736de6d6409f28df543840937e.jpg

you also need longer actuator rods.. i got mine from GCG. you need two of the 1/4 UNF thread 80mm actuator rods for them to reach the wastegate flapper.

4 1/2 turns of preload has them making 8psi on wastegate pressure alone.

making 14psi at around 40% duty on the mac valve, and they are VERY sensitive to duty cycle changes. only a few % here and there makes a few psi difference. had a few coil issues so didn't go any higher until that's sorted.

Edited by burn4005
  • 7 years later...
On 6/15/2016 at 9:15 PM, burn4005 said:

luckily I had HKS actuators, and they are bolted to the bracket rather than welded on (I think the garrett ones are welded to the backet, so won't work):

http://u.2.cf.nengun.com/240692/nengun-240692-00-hks-hks_strengthened_actuator_set_of_2-325c2db07c.jpg

and the turbonetics ones also have the two bolts in the same place.

tnt-30326_w.jpg

they went in with a fair bit of swearing, but only an hour or so work. the support rods on the HKS brackets are in the way when you're trying to get a ring spanner on the actuator bolts, but got there in the end. rear actuator ports point outwards, front actuator ports point inwards so they don't foul the intake piping.

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160405/2c2aa82fd400ccb163ff82bdacf6c524.jpg

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160405/3c6f3e736de6d6409f28df543840937e.jpg

you also need longer actuator rods.. i got mine from GCG. you need two of the 1/4 UNF thread 80mm actuator rods for them to reach the wastegate flapper.

4 1/2 turns of preload has them making 8psi on wastegate pressure alone.

making 14psi at around 40% duty on the mac valve, and they are VERY sensitive to duty cycle changes. only a few % here and there makes a few psi difference. had a few coil issues so didn't go any higher until that's sorted.

Did you run the power cables for the mac valve to the other side of the car near the fusebox? Utilizing the stock boost controller cables? or did you run new ones?

On 6/4/2024 at 11:43 PM, kevboost7 said:

Did you run the power cables for the mac valve to the other side of the car near the fusebox? Utilizing the stock boost controller cables? or did you run new ones?

it was 8 years ago who f**king knows

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Is there a diameter difference in the stock to Nismo? If so, the weight alone won't be indicative when comparing flywheels of the same diameter, since the radius of the flywheel acts on the moment of inertia with a square factor, where as mass is linear. Roughly going from a 4.5kg flywheel with radius 20cm, to a 9kg flywheel with radius 14cm would see them act the same. This calc is just here to act as a brief numbers comparison and reflects no actual RB flywheel diameters etc. it also assumes even weight distribution (thickness) throughout.
    • It seems this could be due to a restructure/team direction change... Or... You're working with a different category of vehicle... Or you've decided you'd rather be able to play with your own cars again...   I'm hoping the latter...
    • had 4 weeks off over xmas and well did some stuff to the shed and BRZ, well short of is I don't work full time in supercars anymore as of yesterday.........
    • Did you get any down time over Christmas, or have you had any since to play with this? Or have you given up and are trying to get yourself a second hand V8SC instead?
    • A random thought I had just before I hit "Submit on this post". If brake fluid, in a container in my garage that has never been opened goes bad after 18 months, why can I leave it in my car for 24 months in an "unsealed container"... Secondly, some other digging, and brake fluid manufacturers seem to be saying 5 year shelf life... Me thinks there line on 18 months for an unsealed bottle is pretty much horse shit marketing spin. Kind of like how if you drive a car and don't run a turbo timer your turbo and motor will die horribly...   Where I started on this though... Someone (me) started down a bit of a rabbit hole, I don't quite have the proper equipment to do Equilibrium Reflux boiling per the proper test standards. I did a little digging on YouTube, and this was the first video I found on someone attempting to "just boil it". This video isn't overly scientific, as we don't have a known reference for his test either. Inaccuracy in his equipment could have him reaching the 460 to 470f boiling point range in reality. In the video, using a laser temp gun, he claims his Dot3 that's been open in his florida garage for over a year gets to about 420 to 430 fahrenheit (215 to 221c) Doing some googling, I located an MSDS for that specific oil, and from new, it claims a dry boiling point of 460 to 470f. Unfortunately they don't list a wet boiling point for us to see how far it degraded toward its "wet" point. While watching it I was thinking "I wonder what the flash point is..." turns out its only 480f for that specific brake fluid....   As for testing the oil's resistance, I might not be able to accurately do that unfortunately. Resistance level will be quite a LOT higher than my system can read I suspect based on some research. However, I might be able to do it by measuring the current when I apply a specific voltage. I won't have an actual water % value, but I'll have some values I can compare between the multitude of fluids. I'll run some vague calculations later and see if I should be able to read any reliable amount of current. These calcs will be based on some values I've found for other oils, and see how close I'll need my terminals together. From memory I can get down to 1pA accuracy on the DMM. I don't think my IOT Power Tester has any better resolution.    
×
×
  • Create New...