Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has anybody tried this type of clutch? I was looking at geting a twin plate but then stumbled onto an advertisement for one of these. Twin plates are fairly expensive and i was hoping to pick one up second hand, however i havent found one yet. I did a search but couldnt find anything on this particular clutch. Any comments?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46407-exedy-hyper-single-plate-clutch/
Share on other sites

I have a super heavy duty Exedy single plate mated to an Ogura light weight flywheel.

It's great. Heaps of grip, progressive in its release and doesn't shudder or do anything anti-social.

Fulcrum point is slightly modified also, so there not much difference in pedal feel, it's just a bit heavier.

  • 3 weeks later...
I have a super heavy duty Exedy single plate mated to an Ogura light weight flywheel.

It's great.  Heaps of grip, progressive in its release and doesn't shudder or do anything anti-social.

Fulcrum point is slightly modified also, so there not much difference in pedal feel, it's just a bit heavier.

bass junky

whered u buy this clutch from?

My clutch is just about totally gone and im shopping around for a single plater

Guest two.06l
bass junky

whered u buy this clutch from?

My clutch is just about totally gone and im shopping around for a single plater

mate do yourself a favor and call jim berry race clutch at stones corner in qld.he builds the best single plate clutches in the business.he modifys the exedy pressure plate and also modifys a nismo clutch plate to suit. these clutches are not just slapped together but all spring tensions are correctly measured for even clampage.we have done over 20 drag runs on one of these clutches(7200rpm dumps and 8700rpm changes)and still doesnt look like slipping.so user friendly can cruise to the shops for the milk and bread and sit in peak hour traffic.i think you can get his number from directory by asking for italia spares stones corner QLD.good luck with your selection..Paul... DIRTgarage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
    • Dort sounds above 3k rpm are dorty 🤣 I might krinkle black the alloy 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...