Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I finally had my car on the Dyno today.

Im a little dissapointed to be honest, I thought it would be a bit better than this.

Car is an R34 GTT

3 inch Exahust turbo back

Trust Pod filter

Greddy Front mount intercooler

E-Boost at 9psi

Rest is stock.

As you can see from the dyno pic there is horrible stuff happening to the power curve.

Im lead to belive that is caused by the stock computer getting upset at 9psi of boost. This sound right?

Im getting a Apexi Power FC installed in a few weeks.

Boost will be incresed then too. Whats a safe level btw? (Ive been told 12 to 14psi).

Anyone want to hazard a guess at what improvment I should see?

Any suggestions on what else to do?

Yeah Bill... You weren't being lied to.

The stock GTS-t/GT-t ECU has a boost cut at 10psi-ish where it retards the timing to protect the engine as it thinks something is wrong and the car is overboosting.

A PowerFC will give you a MUCH nicer power curve... Here's what happened to mine:

BLUE LINE: Standard ECU with 0.9 bar boost

PINK LINE: Power FC with 0.9 bar boost

powerFC.jpg

As Merlis said, you have hit the dreaded Skyline overboost protection. All is good with PFC fitted and tuned. You will pick up the usual 25 rwkw max power and about 40 rwkw average power. :P

PS; get them to do the dyno in 4th gear next time, makes it easier for my poor brain to work out engine rpm. :P

Not entirely sure what each individual abbreviation means but as I understand it, Shoot Out Mode locks certain variables such as ramp rate and drive train inertia settings and calculates the power level based on a benchmark 'standard day'. It does however list the atmospheric and ramp conditions to aid comparison with charts produced elsewhere.

I guess some of the abbrev's would be ramp rates, air temps, barometric pressure etc etc...

Adrian

is the std ecu boost cut for a gtst 10psi??? i thought it was 12psi?

is there are difference between s1 and s2 r33 gtst and r34 gtt for that matter as s2 gtst and r34 gtt have those plastic impeller baldes and what not which ppl say that cant be boosted as much as the ceramic one even though it is ulitmately the same almost...

anyway i got s1 r33 and thought the boost cut was at 12psi, thats all....

Just to clear somthing up here. The ECU doesn't read the boost pressure correct? It caculates it from Air flow. So it is possable to hit boost cut with out running alot of boost say if you put a larger turbo and IC on. I know I have hit the cut in my car at 9 PSI.

Yep, you are correct USRB,

It is an airflow cut, not boost cut technically. Sydneykid has corrected my terminology on this many times, lol.

Thats why you would hit your " boost cut " earlier on a cold day, with full load of passengers, with a bigger turbo, etc etc.

The ecu does not go into this mode from a manifold pressure signal, it will perform this " cut " or " overboost protection " as a direct result from signals sent from the air flow meter.

Bill.

Don't be dissappointed.

I made about the same with very similar mods.

I had 162 with unshielded pod, bleed valve just before boost cut, full exhaust (excluding dump).

I now have a big intercooler, but that big dip is exactly what I get too. It sucks.

I'm about to get A PowerFC fitted thought, so happy days for me.

The more mods you do, the worse the dip.

Get it tuned out.

BASS OUT

I don't mean to knock you so don't take it personally, but isn't that power figure really Poor?

I mean I got a similar figure when I had my R32 with an exhaust, filter, rb25 turbo and 11psi..

and alot of guys get over 160rwkw with stock rb20 turbo..

surely this is not normal for an R34 GTT

unless it's auto.. maybe?

GTST

Problem being that each dyno is slightly different, sometimes significantly different.

I clocked 155rwkw on one dyno, then 126 on another, then wound the boost up and made 162 on a dyno similar dyno to the 126 reading one.

If you extrapolate the above figures you could come up with the following.

155/126 = 1.23 (different between dyno readings)

then 162 x 1.23 =199.26 (taking modded car back to first dyno)

So you could say that I have 199 rwkw if I went to the right dyno........

It's all reletive.

Look at my sig and the quarter mile time, and that should give you a better idea as to the cars grunt.

BASS OUT

yeah the results with the power fc are good, where can you get these from and what is it that they do ?

Pete,

PowerFCs are a stand alone computer which plug straight in where your factory comp is. They run everying including air con etc... They get rid of your speed limiter, boost cut and so on and run much smoother over all. They'll generally cost between $200 and $400 to tune on a dyno with standard mods but they're about the best you can get of the money. Just had mine put in and am pretty happy with it.

This link is about the cheapest place you'll find them:

http://www.nengun.com/index.php?cPath=38_2...14e1fa8438ddc03

I bought some other bits from here a couple of months ago and they usually deliver within a week.

Good luck.

Adam

is the std ecu boost cut for a gtst 10psi??? i thought it was 12psi?

is there are difference between s1 and s2 r33 gtst and r34 gtt for that matter as s2 gtst and r34 gtt have those plastic impeller baldes and what not which ppl say that cant be boosted as much as the ceramic one even though it is ulitmately the same almost...

anyway i got s1 r33 and thought the boost cut was at 12psi, thats all....

Let's clear something up here, R32 GTST, R32 GTR, R33 GTST, R33 GTR and R34 GTT all have ceramic turbines. R32 GTST, R32 GTR, R33 GTST, R33 GTR have steel compressor wheels. These turbos are made by Garrett for Nissan using Nissan tooling. Although I have seen a couple of late R33 GTST's with plastic compressor wheels. All R34 GTT's I have seen have plastic compresor wheels. These turbos are made by Hitachi for Nissan using Nissan tooling.

I have never seen a problem with the plastic compressor wheels, it's the ceramic turbines that are subject to failure at high boost and/or temperature.

The type of turbo fitted has nothing to do with the overboost protection, its dependant on the ECU. :P

A very stupid question, because I'm 99% sure the answer is 'no', but an S-AFC won't help will it? Or will it help smooth things out even though the stocker ECU will still be enabling the boost cut?

An SAFC may well help, ultimately it depends on the amount of airflow. An SAFC simply modifies the voltage from the AFM to the ECU. Generally increasing the boost (from std) causes RB25's to run rich. In order to lean out these excessively rich A/F ratios, the SAFC reduces the AFM voltage the ECU sees. This "tricks" the ECU into believing that the engine is using less airflow than it really is, so the ECU injects less fuel. Hence correcting (leaning out) the A/F ratios. :wassup:

In some cases optimising the A/F ratios requires lowering the AFM voltages below that which the ECU moves into over boost protection. So you don't get the big power "dip" at ~5,000rpm. There is a limit however, around 200 rwkw has been my experience, where the SAFC can't lower the voltages sufficiently and the "dip" returns. :thumbdwn:

The best answer is a Power FC (FC= Full Computer), no more dips then, at any power level. :P

Well, that suits me quite well... the current target is 200rwkw as cheaply (but as safely) as possible. I've cut corners by using a 34GTT intercooler, so if an SAFC can smooth out things up to 200rwkw, fine by me. :P

Thanks SK, excellent advice as always.

Edit: Additional stupid question... anyone know a good place in Sydney to get an SAFC fitted and tuned? I'm off on a driving holiday soon, and I've got some free time there...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Uncle Duncan Yeap, FI Interchiller  Works well, normal IAT's cruising with the WTA only went from 50°c+ to 25-30°c with the interchiller  Before, when on it hard, the IAT would see 80-90°c, now, the highest has been was around 38°c IIRC I recommend it for the street or strip where your only on it hard for 10 or so seconds, but it wouldn't be efficient for sustained track use as it would heat soak from the AC turning off or whatever it does during WOT to protect the compressor It really needs the AC running for it to not heat soak and keep the WTA coolant chilled My WTA coolant temps when just cruising is around 2°c
    • Hey Mark...sorry to interrupt your career change to hair dressing... but...did you ever fit the interchiller to the commodore, and if so how was it? And, who made it?
    • I've been pondering this, I really enjoy the convertible thing, for me, it's like riding a motorbike, without all the issue of riding a motorbike, mainly, my old sore arthritic joints getting beaten up, and, being able to do it in shorts and a T-shirt and not needing a helmet and all the other gear required, especially like wearing jackets and pants in the summer, or needing 6 layers of cloths in the winter, or not having wet weather gear handy when your 100km away from home on the bike when it decides to start raining As for the hard top and its Coupe look, whilst I do lose all that open top feeling that I really enjoy, from my experience with the NB with a detachable hard top, the cabin is a much nicer place to be, the difference in noise for one, a hard top quietens down the interior, alot, with the soft top up or down it's pretty noisy, which, after 5 or so hours, can get tiring But, as you stated, the detachable hard top totally changes the look of the car, in a really good way, and for me, the look of a detachable hard top is so much better than the PRHT which looks more like a after thought with its weird bulbous rear roof line For me, the minimal effort of putting in on, or storing it after removing it, is well worth the time and effort for the look alone And yes, I'm sure the next owner will be grateful for it as well.......  
    • I get into huffs with people when I suggest the MX5 looks so much better as a coupe than it does as convertible. Pretty sure I don't prefer the convertible version of anything. Good job on the hardtop! The next buyer will appreciate.
    • IMO wrap does have its uses, but like you said, quality wrap, and professional installation, would probably cost want a quality paint job does, but, the paint, if maintained, is basically for life, and much easier to touch up if required  In other news: it's pissing down here, with thunder, lightning and only some small hail "at this stage", luckily all "my" cars are undercover  I've also been contacted by a guy in Newcastle about the SS, he said he will come down next weekend for a look, we'll see how that transpires I guess 🫰
×
×
  • Create New...