Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I have a problem with my skyline R34 rb25det neo MT :(

I adjust TPS sensor to 0.5V (like in manual), but in consalt, flag "Closed TPS" is OFF.

How to learn TPS?

I hear, there is a way of 5 times turn a key to IGN, and back to OFF position.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464370-how-to-learn-tps-in-stock-ecu/
Share on other sites

I'm not certain for R34, but on R32 there is a separate throttle closed switch, it doesn't use the TPS output. in any case the stock ECU wouldn't be adjustable.

Have you tested at what voltage/adjustment the throttle switch closes?

BTW what are you trying to fix?

I find a way to adjust the TPS!

First, you need to calibrate base idle to 600 rpm.

Next, you need to adjust the ignition timing to 15 degrees.

At last, rotate TPS to 0.5V, like an manual, and do following:

Key to IGN -> wait 5 sec -> Key to OFF -> wait 5 sec -> Key to IGN -> wait 5 sec -> Key to OFF -> wait 5 sec -> key to IGN -> check "TPS closed" flag in Consult. It will be ON!

You need to do 5 turn of key, or more with 5 seconds waiting.

Duncan, I want to calibrate all sensors to stock values (like in manual) :)

Before, my TPS closed at 0.42V.

f8de5e9409a54d5c914a7e5d266e4855.jpg

Edited by alekseymenkov
  • 1 year later...

i know this is a thread revival, but i (think) i have the same issue i.e. i cant get my ecu to understand the correct voltage to turn on the "throttle closed" flag, which is causing very high idle.  Can anyone else comment on how this learning procedure is supposed to work?  Turning the ignition on and off 5 times did nothing for me.  Consult is reporting that the throttle closed flag is only coming on at around 0.2v, which is too low to be in spec.

well i fixed it.  The 5 x on/off trick is what is necessary on a GTT to reset the ECU's threshold for "closed" throttle TPS voltage, HOWEVER, you must also meet the pre-requisite sensor conditions before starting.  For me, i had to wiggle my gear lever a little until the Neutral Indicator came on solid in NisDataScan, then the 5 x on/off worked.  My neutral switch must be on the way out.

I have also read (but cant confirm) you have to:

- be stationary (der!).

- have the coolant temp above a certain temp.

- have the battery voltage above a certain level.

  • 1 year later...

Does not work for RB20DET and is not necessary.

The RB20DET does not use the TPS potentiometer to determine closed throttle position. There is a switch. You can manually adjust the TPS position so that the switch actuates at the slightest opening of the throttle. Do that and you are gold. If you lean over the engine and open the throttle, you will hear the injectors double pulse. That's the ECU's response to seeing the TPS come off the switch. You want to hear that at the tiniest movement. Tiny.

  • 2 years later...

Major thread bump, for the RB26 (and likely the RB25 I'm guessing) the idle switch is a mysterious thing that somehow resets if you unplug the 5V supply (not the connector with the EV1 style metal clip) while the ECU is on. No need to do weird key tricks, no need to run the engine at all. Just turn the key on to get the ECU running, adjust the TPS to get the requisite 0.45V at idle, tighten it down, then unplug the TPS and plug it back in. It seems an awful lot like the ECU is using TPS voltage for idle detection but if you look at the R33 FSM it details how there's a physical switch in the TPS and that directly goes to the ECU for idle detection. I have no idea how that works.

On 2/4/2022 at 2:07 PM, Duncan said:

Yeah, I'm not sure why, but the stock ECU does use both a throttle switch and the TPS. Aftermarket ECUs just use the TPS so the switch is no longer required.

It was pretty curious, I noticed that the ECU basically doesn't do closed loop idle control if it doesn't see the idle switch. So it can idle low or high depending on coolant temp. I suspect it's also to help transient fueling control as well, it can be pretty hard to tune throttle tip-in just off idle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...