Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone

R32 GTR

I just noticed some gearbox fluid (looks like gearbox oil?) leaking down at the bottom of my transfer case. I've recently got the gearbox re-sealed (rear) and also just re-sealed a sensor in the gearbox but still getting the leak. I've attached a pic to better explain but just want to ask if anyone had any ideas on what it could be before I proceed to fixing it again.

Thanks in advance!

post-140399-14614106878363_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What colour fluid is in the transfer case?

I've seen plenty leak, and it's usually from the gear boot being torn at the top of the transfer case. Oil gets thrown up by the internals and gets past the torn boot and dribbles down the side of the case...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your reply

I'm pretty sure it's gold but I'm going to drop the transfer case oil and double check today.

By gear boot do you mean something like this?

post-140399-14614466336801_thumb.jpg

If so I'll have a look at that today also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes that's exactly what he means.

I've also seen lots of leaks from the rear fitting. Possibly because it is not tight (it uses a flare fitting) or i f not perished o-ring inside that housing.

The transfer case and gearbox are separate internally so you need to identify if the leak is gearbox oil (heavy smelly oil, normally dark honey to black but also possibly smurf blood (thick blue) or purple), vs transfer case leak which is automatic transmission fluid which tends to be red or blue, much thinner and not an oil at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's running Redline lightweight shockproof gear oil, which the colour would suggest, you might want to look at extending the gearbox breather hose as their 'new' formula, tends to foam up and travel up the breather.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's running Redline lightweight shockproof gear oil, which the colour would suggest, you might want to look at extending the gearbox breather hose as their 'new' formula, tends to foam up and travel up the breather.

Bloody stuff. I've got the breather extended up to the brake booster and there was still a puddle of smurf jizz under my car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...