Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Had a Haltec then a Motec M84 and went back to a PFC D-jetro.

The car has been running faultless ever since, no more timing issues and its a real plug in ecu.

Unless going a crank trigger I would stick with Nistune or PFC. They just work.

Put it this way.

I'd keep my car stock before a pfc again.

They are a complete waste of money. Nistune does everything it does.

And you may not want what a haltech does now, but if you do you have wasted time and money getting a half arsed ecu. May have well gone the good one from the start. Not to mention if you do get a power fc and take it to a well known tuner and they can't tune it that means more money down the drain. Let alone all the benefits a haltech brings.

I'll also point out the ecu is arguably the most important part of the car. What's an extra $1000 of you buy new? On the price of a motor it's well worth it.

Tl;dr pfc waste of money.

  • Like 1

Put it this way.

I'd keep my car stock before a pfc again.

They are a complete waste of money. Nistune does everything it does.

And you may not want what a haltech does now, but if you do you have wasted time and money getting a half arsed ecu. May have well gone the good one from the start. Not to mention if you do get a power fc and take it to a well known tuner and they can't tune it that means more money down the drain. Let alone all the benefits a haltech brings.

I'll also point out the ecu is arguably the most important part of the car. What's an extra $1000 of you buy new? On the price of a motor it's well worth it.

Tl;dr pfc waste of money.

I couldn't disagree with you anymore at this point. The higher power you go with Nistune, the worse the tune gets. O2 correction always trying to battle with the tune. I can name quite a few different people with GTRs that are considering swapping from Nistune over to PFC.

You want accurate timing with a Haltech, you kinda need a crank trigger, it jumps all over the shop without one. It's not "just an extra grand" for most people who haven't swung a spanner in their lives. PowerFC does the job, and it has been doing the job for the last 25+ years on THOUSANDS of high performance cars. You cannot possibly use confirmation bias just because you had a junk tune, and trash the ECU which thousands of people have zero issues with.

  • Like 1

There was nothing wrong with my tune, bit ecu technology has come a long way. The pfc was good. It's just not worth the $$ they ask for now. And yes it is $1000 difference and I have the receipts to prove it. You don't need a crank trigger so all.

Point is, why half arsed do something that will end up costing you more down the line. Just get a decent ecu to begin with.

Because 50% of Gtr owners realise the hole they have dug themselves within a year of ownership and sell up and cut their losses. The other half bend over and open up their wallets anyway, spending a little more than a small fortune. :P

Edited by iruvyouskyrine

There was nothing wrong with my tune, bit ecu technology has come a long way. The pfc was good. It's just not worth the $$ they ask for now. And yes it is $1000 difference and I have the receipts to prove it. You don't need a crank trigger so all.

Point is, why half arsed do something that will end up costing you more down the line. Just get a decent ecu to begin with.

You can get them secondhand for $400 if you wait long enough, average price is $600 for a GTR PFC. How is it half arsing? It'll go with your mods all the way up to 450kw very comfortably.. even more if you go D-Jetro..

You don't need a crank trigger so all.

Its a known issue that they have difficulty reading the cas signal which is hit and miss, just call haltec or Motec and they will clarify your error.

Point is, why half arsed do something that will end up costing you more down the line. Just get a decent ecu to begin with.

Where is a nistune or PFC half arsed? You just don't get the wank factor bells and whistles that you really don't need in a street car if the tuner knows what he is doing.

The only real choice to make is to stick with the AFM or go MAP. Apart from that Nistune or PFC will manage a 400kw+ car easily and perfectly.

Edited by XGTRX

You can get them secondhand for $400 if you wait long enough, average price is $600 for a GTR PFC. How is it half arsing? It'll go with your mods all the way up to 450kw very comfortably.. even more if you go D-Jetro..

dont go second hand.

The ecu and tune is the most important part of the build.

  • Like 1

If you've built a 400kw car you have obviously spent abit of money so why would you skimp on the thing that is going to keep your car running right.

Buy the best computer your budget will allow and make sure you get it tuned by someone with the correct knowledge to tune it correctly

  • Like 2

fyp. Have you never spoken to anyone who has bought a stuffed second hand ecu?

This isn't a missile car, this is a 400+kw R. Choose parts wisely and don't cut corners.

Yes and I've had a hand in building many of those cars. I could confidently say less than 10% of those who have gone second hand, have had problems, I'm talking 40+ cars here as well.

So 90% have had problems?

I rest my case.

Okay mate, I edited my post before you posted that but if you want to be childish thats fine.

Anfanee, what exactly is a platinum pro going to do over a PFC that your average joe shmo actually NEEDS? Go on GTR PARTS on Facebook and you can pickup a PFC D-Jetro any day of the week for $700. I don't see what the issue is here?

My point is. It's a much better ecu. And it's future proof. If you end up deciding you want the extra features that $500 tune may have well gone a haltech from the start.

Also AFM are shit.

You're right on all those parts you just said, I just don't think the average person needs it, 400kw isn't even anything fancy nowadays in the GTR world. Every third GTR in Sydney seems to be minimum 350-400kw. You buy an ECU to suit your application and in most cases a PFC is going to more than cut it.

On top of that... you should be listening to your tuner anyway. If he tells you he prefers to tune Haltech or PFC, then you should definitely be listening up!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
    • The odometer does go up when driving.  Does this tell it is an issue with the speedometer itself?    Where can I look for replacement cluster? Or speedo? I can likely do the repair.. Will ER34 cluster work on HR34? Or do I need a HR34 20GT S2 specifically lol   
    • Mine's a bit bigger at 70x150mm roughly. The spots are flat, just can feel the edges if I dig my nail into it. I did fix some other other ones by both using my finger to sand that small spot (I'm a bit wary of doing this and creating hot spots and a bigger mess) and I also did sand over it flat and others, but this also worried me a bit because if I create an overall low spot on the panel on paint that is good.  Correct me if I'm wrong but as long as it's flat even if I can feel the edges, I can put filler because it will all be level once I sand it? I can see myself going in a circle after sanding guidecoat with 320 grit if for example the panel is flat with my hand but because I sanded the guidecoat I could have created a low spot again somewhere. Unless where I'm going wrong is what I mentioned previously where I didn't go low enough on the grits. It's 1 step forward and 2 step backwards here haha. I'll probably need to experiment with it more. Last time I go back to bare metal lol.
×
×
  • Create New...