Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Press release here; http://nissannews.com/en-US/nissan/usa/releases/nissan-and-mitsubishi-motors-forge-strategic-alliance-nissan-to-take-34-stake-in-mitsubishi-motors-for-237-billion-yen

Nissan and MMC have agreed to cooperate in areas including purchasing, common vehicle platforms, technology-sharing, joint plant utilization and growth markets.

God I hope those "common vehicle platforms" come from Nissan.

What do you think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464779-nissan-is-buying-34-of-mitsubishi/
Share on other sites

why is everyone thinking Evo + GTR?

how many car companies arent owned by some sort of evil puppet master company?

how many of them merge their sports cars together or even base them on similar thing? (the answer is basically none)

But if Nissan takes Mitsubishis SST tech and ditches the CVT, i wont complain.

  • Like 1

why is everyone thinking Evo + GTR?

how many car companies arent owned by some sort of evil puppet master company?

how many of them merge their sports cars together or even base them on similar thing? (the answer is basically none)

But if Nissan takes Mitsubishis SST tech and ditches the CVT, i wont complain.

Mitsubishi colt GTiR?

  • Like 2

why is everyone thinking Evo + GTR?

how many car companies arent owned by some sort of evil puppet master company?

how many of them merge their sports cars together or even base them on similar thing? (the answer is basically none)

But if Nissan takes Mitsubishis SST tech and ditches the CVT, i wont complain.

I'm thinking evo VS gtr....

Hopefully they can bring it back on a slightly different platform like they have the gtr.

Or, re-release the gto.

  • Like 1

Hate to predict a marriage of something boring to make them lots of money... Like lancer + pulsar common platform.

Maybe It will enable them to do something innovative with hybrid or battery tech?

I just hope it prolongs / revitalises the EVO heritage. Shitsubishi needs a hero car. God help them for releasing the new Pajero. So ugly. MUST have been designed for the Asian markets.

  • Like 1

Hate to predict a marriage of something boring to make them lots of money... Like lancer + pulsar common platform.

Maybe It will enable them to do something innovative with hybrid or battery tech?

I just hope it prolongs / revitalises the EVO heritage. Shitsubishi needs a hero car. God help them for releasing the new Pajero. So ugly. MUST have been designed for the Asian markets.

I call it the new challenger.

It's too small (especially the interior) to be a pajero.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • True, might get it looked at. Found out you can in fact flatten the 12v battery relatively easily too the other day (kids lefts the hazards on) so meaning to get that checked in the new year. What's odd is it'll blow cold from both vents if you have the ac down as low as poss (18), but anything else the passenger one blows warmish. Also has been summer since I got it obvs but noticed it didn't seem to want to blow hot last night when we had a cold snap. 
    • You ask for things. You specifically state you want responsiveness. A link was provided for a far superior, more responsive option. Find a MX5 workshop that will install it for you. Maybe MX5 Mania will throw on the Fab9 kit. It seems they want to charge almost 14K installed for their kit, so if they charge you $6K to install the FAB9 kit then you'll be ahead? Though really, the 2.5 with a 2860 running low boost will more or less feel as good as anything else. It's a lot of displacement and a small turbo. Think of a more modern RB26 with one stock turbo :p TBH, truth be told I've been driving my own car, and use about 50% throttle at most for 99.9% of the time. Mr Bogan is likely similar so this is all going to be semantics for the use case he actually has. (He'll be happy with anything relative to now) However, the EFR is hands down far superior in this use case. You really, really, really, really do notice it over the Garrett or equivalent.  
    • You are correct, the earlier the torque, the earlier things snap
    • Gents, it will be getting the MX5 Mania kit and the 2.5 will be staying where it is My query was about the 0.64 or the 0.86, whilst the 0.64 might spool a bit faster, would the 0.86 be better IRT EGT and mechanical sympathy, with only a small difference in spool And as I assume I won't need alot of boost to get to 200kw, probably around 10 psi, and with max rpm at 6500, would high EGT even really be a issue with a 0.64 I'm heading into MX5 Mania at the end of Jan to discuss the install, so any info is welcome prior to that Basically have a chat and book a time so they can throw on the turbo kit, and fit a oil cooler with a thermostat, drive in drive out of course  In other news: just finished cleaning the car inside and out, it's now all ready to get covered in bugs and dirt driving to Goulburn tomorrow to lunch,  and go for a stroll along woolondilly River with the daughter and her boy, and of course, visit my grandcats and my new grandpuppy 
    • Sounds like it has an actual problem with mode select doors, or something.
×
×
  • Create New...