Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Due to a Turbo upgrade (Going High-Mount Exhaust Manifold) & my Intercooler being a Blitz Return-Flow, I've realised I will most likely be better/should run a FFP. My first pick is Plazmaman but I've since come across a new (I think) Manifold made by a company called Otaku Garage. They claim to out-flow a genuine GReddy but idk the legitimacy of that.

Anyways, just wondering if anyone has heard of/used these Inlet Manifold's and can let me know what the go is with them. They do look like good quality from what I can see, but I don't want to have to spend money twice cos the product is bad etc.

Car is an RB25 R33 (S1), although would be good to hear back from anyone that has used the Inlet Manifold

Link is here - https://www.otakugarage.com.au/product/otaku-garage-intake-manifold-forward-facing-plenum-rb25det-series-1-2-neo/

Thanks!

Only heard about these a few weeks ago.

Wonder how the CPC or Plazmaman go in comparison.

Alright guys, here is all the testing & results on our manifolds. Head to our online store to grab one: https://www.otakugarage.com.au/shop/intake/

Notable observation, rumour has always been that the GReddy intakemanifolds caused cylinder 6 to lean out. It had always been speculation that perhaps that was incorrect, only because the flange angle direction and distance from the throttle body that i would receive the least amount of air. So far we have completed cylinder balance testing on our intakemanifolds, and the RB25DET GReddy. Before the test we were discussing what our expectation was going to be and we assumed well.

First let's start with the GReddy manifold, as I would have assumed cylinder six was quite the opposite of what people always say. Number six was actually the cylinder that received the least amount of air movement. The cylinder that receive the majority was actually cylinder two followed by cylinder three. This can also be traced to its design where the throttle flange angle points directly on cylinder number two. Unfortunately thesemanifolds are not cast identically between cylinders and the runner lengths are different. I had never realised how much of a deviation that these manifolds had until now. It is actually a very poor design in respect to balancing.

Our manifold did a better job of spreading the balance. The longer equal length CNC design off of the common collector provided for better distribution with a much lower deviated average between the cylinders. However the scenario was the same where the runner at the centre line of the throttle flange is the manifold that receives the most amount of air movement. However on this particular unit number five is the highest number and number one is the lowest. However the deviation to average is minimal in comparison.

Otaku Garage RB25/RB26 Billet CNC Intake Manifold

200 CFM source
Average flow 2950 feet per minute using , Highest (5) 3087 fpm, lowest (1) 2991 fpm

Greddy gasket ported RB25 manifold
200 CFM source
Average flow 2790 feet per minute using , Highest (2) 2988 fpm, lowest (6) 2690 fpm

For the testing process that we used a calibrated 200 CFM electric motor fan and a eGMP rated and calibrated hot wire anemometer. The measurements were taking at each individual runner and recorded at a 10 second average. Each number was recorded three times.

Pressure Tested at 50PSI no leaks or issues at all.

I used to have that style of manifold, but after several years swapped back to the standard lower runners with a MX Performance/SME plenum top (similar to plazmaman).

The shorter runners really kill the torque and also increase the spooling time of the turbo - unless it's a dedicated race car there's no way I'd consider a short runner manifold (like the Otaku Garage one) again.

Do you have any pics/link/info on your plenum?

The manufacturer of my plenum now operates under the name "Sydney Motorsports Engineering", the best way to check them out is on Facebook. I had a quick look and there's a post on 12 Feb 2015 which shows the plenum, or you can check out my build thread (for more pictures) in the projects section on here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...