Jump to content
SAU Community

Spherical Bearings In Knuckles


Recommended Posts

Been recently reading on replacement of rubber bushes in knuckles with spherical

Obviously benefits being less movement etc etc ..insert technical term here...

Has anyone done this with any feedback ? if so any info on kits and where to get etc

Im running r32 gtst with std knuckles / uprights I can only see stuff for z32 / gtr rear knuckles / uprights on SPL website

bonus question Ive talked to a few guys with s13/14 racecars that have replaced rear knuckles with GTR uprights - 2kg less sprung weight a side + added sphericals - obviously a lot of messing around but has anyone gone to this level ? just interested

Edited by bcozican
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think your terminology might need straightening out. The locations where you would replace original rubber bushes with spherical bearings are in the ends of the various suspension arms, not the knuckles. Sure, the outer ends of each of those arms are connected to the knuckles by those bushes/bearings, but the knuckle doesn't care - the bushes belong to the arms.

Any front upper arm for a Z32 will fit an R32.

Any rear arm for R32 is generally common with S13 and Z32.

Spherical bearings on suspension arms remove almost all the slop in the bushes and so will tend to make the suspension a lot more accurate and precise. Also rougher riding and noisier. Also illegal on the road, although arguably it is the adjustable length of those arms that should be what the popo/rta should be upset about. Anyway, you will get in trouble for them if caught with them. They also have a relatively short life, being a metal on metal wearing surface with dirt and water in close proximity.

As to GTR rear uprights.....usually done as a complete GTR rear end transplant, involving the diff and big 6 bolt driveshafts. Doesn't really offer any benefit beyond the weight saving you're already aware of and the GTR diff/shafts package that comes with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I should have elaborate a bit more

This is for track only, I have all adj arms yes and its for the rear knuckles

I was referring to the bushes in the knuckle being replaced, as per pic. So basically it would reduce the slack / give on the knuckle side of the arm just reducing another lot of movement in the suspension setup

Can see the S13/ 14 and GTR kits here

I will have to have a measure etc to see if the s13 kits are the size size as what in the std r32 gtst rear knuckle

For some reason my computer is being full tard so I cant copy the link in but www.splparts.com has them

post-41809-0-01243400-1466120273_thumb.jpg

Edited by bcozican
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, yep, with you now. I replaced those with urethane on mine, which is better than rubber and not as rough and noisy as steel. Steel is obviously the far extreme of what's possible.

Worth doing for a track car, I'm sure.

Another thought on the topic of R32 GTR rear uprights. Change to them and you change your damper lower connection type too. Means mo' money!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks yeop might investigate the ability to get the sphericals into the rear and give it a go - wouldn't think they last too long but you never know until its tried I spose

yeah GTR knuckles require changing to forked bottom mount on new MCA coils ...hmmmm

might end up being too much coin and messing around .. the appeal of reducing unsprung weight for 4 kgs is high though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R34 GTT rear knuckles are also aluminium alloy with the same forked shock mount. However they come with the smaller driveshaft spline I believe. I am using these with 3x2 bolt driveshafts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on.
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...