Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all as usual when someone starts a new topic they need something so...

I had a battery place put a bigger battery in me 260RS today & installed larger terminals to fit as the stock battery in these cars is just way too small. well I asked the to bridge the car with a patch battery so I didn't loose all my head unit setting etc & of course they didn't.

Now apart for reseting everything inn my car the JUPITER ESL-165 R remote start /entry system just beeps & beeps from under the dash, does anybody know how to re-arm the fob & system I read the Japanese instructions as best I could but I must be missing something as the procedure of unplugging the harness plugging it back in then turning the ignition to on then carry out the cut engine procedure twice then turn off the ignition din NOT work...

ANY help would be greatly appreciated...

REMOTE ESL-165R.pdf

So i went to see a Japanese girl that works in a cafe in town & I have done everything right, the problem I have is, there is NO procedure in the manual for a manual car, only for an automatic so the system wont activate unless your in park, but I cant activate my system as you need yo go from Park to Neutral to Park with you foot on the brake & ignition on but I cant do that in a manual car...

Can anybody please shed some light onto my dim brain of what the procedure is for telling the Jupiteru ESL-165R that it is in fact in neutral?

Again ANY help would be something.

Would it be wired up to the reverse lights? Try going revere then nuetral

I have tried that but will have to try a few variations like using the clutch NOT using the clutch using the brake etc etc... if I could find a wiring diagram for it i could solve this so much easier...

Thanks for the idea.. I'll give it another go with the different combinations.

  • 2 weeks later...

OK I give up... it goes in Friday for a Viper 5706V Alarm Remote Start Turbo timer etc instal.... 

amazing how people DON'T do what you ask & it cost you $900 & there is no recourse as (its not standard so it shouldn't happen) excuse.

All I asked was put a jumper battery on the car when the fitted a new battery & terminals BUT NO thats too hard apparently.

NO MORE if I want a good job from now on I'll waste my time doing their jobs so I know its done right... rant rant rant rave.............

ah I fell better now & I didn't even have to kick the dog :)

 

  • Like 1

OK, the wrap up...

New alarm is a Viper 5706V 2-Way Security System, its a 2 way with LCD key fob & paging alerts (beep & vibrate USB rechargeable).

It comes with 2 remotes, 1 LCD Screen 2-Way and 1 5-button 1-Way Up to 1 Mile Range. apart from a great alarm it has everything I need, remote start, turbo timer, lock unlock  & much more it is an awesome system & upgradeable. (windows, proximity warning, Unlocks your doors and disarms the system as you approach Locks your doors and arms the system as you walk away)  

The Yupiteru system was fitted with a T harness adapter so it was just unplug & remove. Not really a stealth system but it was more a remote start, central locking kit...

The battery place was just a large franchise in Wickham with guys that were just over it I guess, No care given, Too hard box, I cant blame the company but the employees suck. 

It's all done now & I am more than happy with the job that House of Soundz Kotara did fitting the system, not a mark anywhere.

While I was at it I fitted a20 LED light bar behind the gril. Looks excellent & works a treat. When it's not on it looks like an unmarked police car with the LEDs just visible through the grill. Then on high beam BAM daylight & looks totally stock. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...