Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys.

I'm wondering has anybody experimented with GTX cores inside factory turbo housings, it doesn't seem these are widely available but people such as Munro do offer rebuilds
using GTX Cores.

I'm wondering if I could get for example -5 like top end, with -7 or -9 like low and mid range, I'm keen to hear you guys experiences as I can't quite find too much information on
the internet on it.  Cheers.

Yeah. Got it done, didn't end up using them.

Few ways to go about it. The gtx2860 cores are the same rear as -5s, so you need to use -5 rear housings, stock ones won't work. You can make stock front housings work, at least the ones I had did though they had a 60mm wheel in them before I bought then blown. The turbo you get is going to be more of a slightly better -5 though.

 

In theory you could stick a gtx2860 front wheel onto the front of a -9 core and get a -9 with more compressor. This may work well I think, as the compressor on a -7 will max out, however yoi may find the rear chokes to much . (-7/-9 are smaller rears than -5, hence less lag). I heard rumours someone was trying to make a set of these but I don't know how they went.

 

Hks just released some new billet front wheel turbos, no results on them yet.

45 minutes ago, sneakey pete said:

 

Hks just released some new billet front wheel turbos, no results on them yet.

Yeah. If you look carefully they're journal bearing. Really? 

They also produced a dyno graph which I would take with a grain of salt. The overlay between 2530's and RS's is not accurate. We all know how much worse RS's are compared to 2530's.

 

 

I had something similar done with my -5's by Procharge and they turned out pretty well, its a very cost effective path forward if you want to stick with stock looking low mount twins.

They upgraded the compressor housing to a .60 (from .42) and put in GTX2687 wheels, while porting out the turbine housing to get the best possible flow as they are a little small for what a lot of people try to push through them.  I have been very happy with the results so far but due to the displacement bump on my car (2.6 -> 3.4) its not possible to do a fair back to back...

GTX hybrids.jpg

My experience high flowing Twin GTR turbos internally gated is the turbos has issues dumping back pressure through a 3 or 3.5 inches exhaust. -5 on stock cams is very laggy, without been able to dump back pressure, fancy billet wheels can not run into their peek efficiencies. I've personally used -9 specs in my own GTR, pretty happy with that and thats recommended for road and track use.

  • Like 1

Piggaz - Its heading in for the final tune in just over over week but on the run in tune (standard 98, wastegate pressure (~15psi) and zip in terms of timing) it knocks out 342KW at the treads @ 4600rpm. Will post up a full build post when its tuned as my previous build post got rejected / deleted...

 

 

I reckon the best replacements based on standard sized RB26 compressor and turbine housings is the -9 turbos . They may not have fancy CNC'd compressor wheels in them but they appear to work very well in a 2568cc 1500Kg GTR . They are not a ring in but a dialed in unit so a result is not a fingers crossed guess .

Hi Sneaky pete

Why didn't you end up testing them?  Do you still have them?

Yes i had read that whole thread a while ago, and recently re-read it all.

There was one guy who said he had great success, e.g 80hp more than -5's with -5 like response.
But I don't get why others say the GTX will hardly offer any more efficiency when trying to use RB26 style housings,
example how Tao at Hypergear is saying it wont really work out, I'm just trying to see where the confusion ends
as so far only 1 person has sumbitted awesome feedback, but most turbo shops and builders say the GTX just wont give any real benefit.

What's the go with the new HKS units?  
Link?  Are they bolt on to replace factory RB26 units?

Edited by RB335
  • 4 weeks later...

I am very interested in knowing as well.  This past weekend I talked to another guy running -5's with GTX in his R33, and he likes it very much.  But for my own setup I have been looking at standard -9's for a while, and so far I can't find any information/feedback on upgrading standard -9's with GTX. 

What I'm saying is the gtx and -5 rear is a bigger wheel than the -7/-9, so it's going to be laggier but have more power potential. There isno best turbo, all depends on your goals.

Didn't know atp is making kits, go any info/links?

11 hours ago, sneakey pete said:

Didn't know atp is making kits, go any info/links?

ATP probably has one of the worst websites to navigate...  Go to GTX section of the website first, then click on the size of 'GTX w/o turbine' you want and you can find additional options.  Here is the link for -5/-10 housing, you have to scroll all the way to the bottom and the last option available is to add .64 a/r T25 -5/-10 housing for $225.42 USD.

http://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=tp&Product_Code=GRT-TBO-188&Category_Code=GTX

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, does anyone know how I can, or can a moderator remove this advertisement please.  Has been sold a long time ago and would like to remove references. Thanks. 
    • There are adaptors that allow you to delete the booster and use an s15 clutch master cylinder.    if you want to keep the booster they are still available brand new 
    • I visited again today: It would appear they have painted the main body of the car and some parts of some of the panels, so I can say that I now have BMW parts in my car, much to the envy of @Dose Pipe Sutututu It is still covered in dust which is quite the tease but I did look at a few circumspect spots that will be behind bumpers and such and wiped some dust away: After my repeated begging to PLEASE DONT PAINT OVER THE ENGINEERING CERTIFICATE (you have to re-engineer the entire car if they do) I see THIS: Which is great. Excellent job tbh at least to me. A better non dusty example would be the backs of the doors that have been painted: Giving a reasonable contrast between old and new (I know the old isn't clear coated on the inside of doors). The door card will well and truly cover where the old paint is, you can see in the second pic some of the black butyl/whatever shit is sticking the plastic sheet behind the door transfer that has happened since it's clearly been stuck back on. The most maddening thing about this colour is every time I saw it in the wild it looks like another colour, same with photos of many cars with the same colour looking wildly different in every photo anybody ever takes and this is no exception. But stand a little further back and it suddenly looks dark AF. I did tell them when I was discussing which of the 70 million charcoal colours to choose from (a porsche one, a BMW one, or a R32 GTR one etc) that if they just ignored me and chose one at random I would probably never notice. Maybe they did. But the colour is supposed to be B39 (BMW Mineral Gray). Boring I know, but the R34 sedan (to me) really shows off it's boat-ness when you paint it in a bright colour like bayside blue or white or whatever else. I do have a fondness for AR2 Nissan Red, but decided against that because it'll have pretty odd contrast to random bits unpainted (like engine bay, bits of trim etc, and maybe it'll fade). And people will always fkin comment on AR2. Everything remains super dusty. I have tracking numbers for the new heads, as well as some Improved Racing goodies, but they probably will be a next year thing by the time they end up on the car. I did some maths on the heads and I know why nobody goes to this extent in Australia, because it's really not worth it, given I could have just CNC'ed my current heads, bought a FAST102/TB and used my current rocker/spring/cam combination and get a 383 stroker (or stroked a 6.0 GenIV bottom end to 6.6L) built for the same price of just the setup in the mail/on the floor here. Or I could have bought a LS3 and a Drysump system. And then have a complete engine to sell. Oh well
    • We just disconnected the vacuum line if I remember correctly, booster is still there. Is there a rebuild solution for the booster or a different adapter that will work for GTR chassis?
    • Yeah 4wd (boosted) has a recess in the firewall for the booster, and 2wd is flat - the example in the link shows the flat surface. When you deleted the booster, did you just attach the factory slave cylinder directly to the recess in the firewall with no adaption?  
×
×
  • Create New...