Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all

I have a 32gtst and i was planning on putting a rb25 in it.

At the moment it has the 20 and is around 170kws and i just feel its lifeless and gutless. The plan was to chuck in a rb25 but then i have toi take it through regency and get it checked, plus upgrade a few things to get it through. is it worth it?

If both engines chucked out say 250kws, will you notice much difference between engines? Its all im looking at for a daily weather it be the 20 or 25. 

Just dont know if its worth the hassel as im building a 25/30 at the moment for the track car and i just cant be stuffed!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/465900-opinions-rb20-or-25/
Share on other sites

The difference between my cefiro (230-240rwkw RB20) and my daily (Stock RB25DET R33 sedan) is huge, on the street.

Cefiro needs revs, and lots of them. It is laggy.

R33 feels like its on boost instantly, comparably, obviously with less up top, which, as GTSboy said, is where it counts for a street car.

Then I drive the missus TT 300ZX and wonder what the F*%k I'm doing with an RB20

Haha.

All depends what you like. I don't really mind the lag, can still putt around off boost, and is fine for the track (drifting). Would piss me off if I had to drive it in traffic everyday though.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
RB25DET NEO, put in ARP2000 studs, slap on a GTX3576 on a TS manifold with divided 0.83 rear housing + all supporting BS.. make 400kW+


Destroy the oil pump from one of there many issues to you throw a rod threw the block and destroy everything.

Too much timing bent a rod? Haha

I always relax on the timing peak torque to keep these stock RBs together. Been doing 370kW on mine for some time, prior to that a good 330kW. 

Head gasket is going though, must have screwed it prior through ARP studs. Do about 4 to 5 hard laps and you'll lose coolant.

My old 32 was my daily for 6 years, running 200 odd for most of that time

If you can get a 2530 or similar turbo (I had a 2510) and set it up to run 18-20psi it's not overly laggy and provides good top end

During the same time I had 2 mates with 33's making similar peak power and the extra cc's plus the vct made them a much quicker car everywhere

If I was my car, being a daily I'd go rb25. Even with a stock turbo setup making 200kw it would be a quick daily

  • Like 2

RB30E is where it's at for daily driving :P

In saying that, my stocker RB20 R32 with R34 turbo was a good daily drive, albeit slow, unless I revved it out.
Was averaging 9L/100km because in traffic, no boost until 3,000rpm + slow moving = long boring drives to work and home.

In saying that, NEO6 turbo is a much better drive and decently efficient as well (a relo of mine put one in his R31). RB30 with NEO head even more so haha.

Since your other cars have higher powered engines, put a V8 in your R32.

  • Like 1

More the oil pump has the same crank nose issue on the neo as early 25s and end up with no oil pressure and a dead motor. No tune is going to help that, conservative driving will yet no fun in that. Pointless doing up what's a potential hand grenade without fixing oil control issues first.

Yuh, but Jonny dose-a-holic is a subscriber of the blow-it-up-and-slip-another-stock-engine-in school of thought.  Play engine roulette.  Sometimes you win for ever.  Sometimes you lose in a week.  If you lose, you spend another grand and have another spin.

The alternative is to open the engine, let all the Nissan out and spend $5k putting expensive parts inside.  Different sort of roulette.

  • Like 1
Yuh, but Jonny dose-a-holic is a subscriber of the blow-it-up-and-slip-another-stock-engine-in school of thought.  Play engine roulette.  Sometimes you win for ever.  Sometimes you lose in a week.  If you lose, you spend another grand and have another spin.

The alternative is to open the engine, let all the Nissan out and spend $5k putting expensive parts inside.  Different sort of roulette.


I'm also in the, if it ain't broke don't fix it school of thought. Why spend big $ on something that "may" happen. RB25's aren't exactly rare and there's no premium a week before race wars either:). Plenty of guys out there pushing decent power and tracking stock RB25's without issue. Obviously drift guys sitting on the limiter constantly are more likely to have problems.

Back on topic the OP asked about. A 25 will be better in every way as a daily and 250rwkw will be childs play for it. The low end torque and response being the major difference. Keep the Nissan in and keep smiling[emoji106]
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
×
×
  • Create New...