Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , I'm curious to know what you gain and lose in an R33 spec RB25DET with these cams . I've had them for a long time and can't remember what it was like to tune a car for road with standard cams . Earlier on I had a PFC/Z32 and 740 Nismos and GTRS dryer where as now doing a bit better in those areas .

Even so I just wonder what you lose in idle quality and drivability right down low . I know that 256 degree cams aren't exactly wild but the standard ones are from memory 240 and I image timed to have a bit less overlap .

Also I'm curious to know if moving the cam timing around does anything for Poncams , exhaust is easy enough and inlet apparently with a bit of mucking around .

 

Gotta run cheers  A . 

 

 

Cheers  A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/466083-256-rb25-poncam-experiences-plz/
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, discopotato03 said:

I don't suppose anyone knows what the actual opening and closing points are valve timing wise , I wouldn't mind knowing what the overlap period is .

A .

http://www.rhdjapan.com/tomei-camshafts-poncam-rb25de-t.html

scroll down to your engine of choice.

  • Like 1

From the R33 Engine Workshop manual .

Bear in mind variation in inlet cam timing .

Inlet 0-60 inactive (0+60 +180=240)

Inlet 20-40 early   (20+40+180=240)

Exh 57-3               (3+57+180=240)

These numbers line up with the 240/240 durations and I thing the lobe centers were 120 inlet and 117 exhaust .

Note the overlap timing would be (inactive) 3 degrees and (early) 23 degrees .

A .


Also I'm curious to know if moving the cam timing around does anything for Poncams , exhaust is easy enough and inlet apparently with a bit of mucking around .



After trying a couple spots and seeing dyno results I'd say to get a decent shift in power earlier I had the inlet advanced so far It had no power at idle. I even had throttle adjusted so low as vct under 1000 would stall.

I now run inlet as recommended. Need to experiment with exhaust timing next time it's up for a tune
7 hours ago, t_revz said:

After trying a couple spots and seeing dyno results I'd say to get a decent shift in power earlier I had the inlet advanced so far It had no power at idle. I even had throttle adjusted so low as vct under 1000 would stall.

I now run inlet as recommended. Need to experiment with exhaust timing next time it's up for a tune

 

What kind of general idle quality have you had with it at the recommended setting?  Does it sound at all "cammy"?

What kind of general idle quality have you had with it at the recommended setting?  Does it sound at all "cammy"?



Not noticeable now. It was hunting when warm from 500-1100 when the idle screw was too far in but it's smooth now.

like whats his face said, there aint much difference from idle and down low infact its better everywhere, sure the idle changes slightly cause its larger lift and duration but its not a severe change ...just do it man. u wont regret it!

ps.. wow this place changed alot .. just logged in today and its like a ghost town. saw a few tumbleweeds on the home page..

Was hoping there might be the slightest hint of "bigger cam" sound at idle, not necessarily lopey or anything but I like being able to tell there is a bit more going on than stock haha.  Was pretty sure performance wise they'd be a bit of a treat :)  Cheers!

Was hoping there might be the slightest hint of "bigger cam" sound at idle, not necessarily lopey or anything but I like being able to tell there is a bit more going on than stock haha.  Was pretty sure performance wise they'd be a bit of a treat [emoji4]  Cheers!



Closing the idle screw down I can get it to hunt as hard as a big v8...but I sound like a tool when at the lights and can't take off without throttle

you can nearly make Poncams go "brap brap brap" purely for wank factor.. just drop the idle timing down to about 8~10  and lean out the AFRs hahaha

(everyone reading this, please don't do it)

  • Like 2

I thought that might be the case.  Most of the aftermarket cams I've tuned for have been big enough (read: 280-300+deg) to do it anyway, good to know you can do a bit with wee 256s - thanks, Johnny ;) Dose on!

Each to their own.  Hate dose, love a hearty idle!   If you can get a hearty idle with a small cam, win win.   The cars with huge cams are NA race motors, btw... huge boost and dose don't apply.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...