Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, gzro said:

Would a 0.92 ar work on stock displacement? Plus vcam?

Really reluctant to build a 2.8l engine when the current engine is still healthy,  current engine is <15k after rebuilt..

Straight up, you basically have 3 incompatible requirements:

1) EFR9180 power levels

2) Want to be able to get good pull from <4000rpm

3) An RB26

Remove the thing from that list which missing out on will bother you the least.  DON'T go with a .92 housing especially on a 9180, its not going to make it worth while.  It won't spool the way you want and it will also choke the compressor, worst of both worlds.

 

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

The 9180/0.92 is kind of retarded. If you want the power that the 91 mm compressor can flow/give, you’re not going to get there by choking up the turbine side. So now you have a larger compressor and turbine to turn making it lazier than it needs to be THEN won’t make the power because it’s choked.

the 8374/1.05 makes much more sense. No, it won’t be lazy/laggy because of the larger AR rear.

Big compressors and small AR rears “to chase response” DONT work. 

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, gzro said:

Would a 0.92 ar work on stock displacement? Plus vcam?

Really reluctant to build a 2.8l engine when the current engine is still healthy,  current engine is <15k after rebuilt..

Theres been 6 votes for the 8374 mate take the advice.

Its a beast of a turbo! 

 

.92 is fail on pretty much most EFR's & you'd also find going .92 and v cam you probably wouldn't be able to swing the intake cam a whole lot due to the turbine choking. 

8374/1.05 & V cam is an absolute killer combo on a 26! Make 450+kw and be getting your face peeled off by 4000rpm. 

It will make 100+kw more than your current setup and will be on sooner, power delivery will be much more linear and there will be alot more of it everywhere. 

How much more could you ask for?! 

7 minutes ago, Mick_o said:

Theres been 6 votes for the 8374 mate take the advice.

Its a beast of a turbo! 

7 votes   :D

 

 

LOL.  Thanks all. 

Got the hint, loud and clear.
I need to sell the 9180 and get 8374 back... That is after I have confirmed that 9180 is not a good idea on stock displacement, which you all kindly did.

The 9180, vcam and stuffs are all meant for a 2.8l engine that I planned earlier - sole reason why I sold the 8374 and got the 9180.  2.8l is still an option albeit an expensive one and i would rather not as the current engine is still very healthy and reasonably new.

Vcam is not going in so soon. I need a set of piston with valve recess as the current cp pistons do not have them.

I am currently running poncam type b. For the vcam, I bought hks 264 step 2 exhaust cam. It has a slightly bigger lift (10mm vs 9.15mm). Would you recommend swapping the hks in while maintaining the tomei type b intake cam when I swap over to the ported head?

3 hours ago, Lithium said:

Straight up, you basically have 3 incompatible requirements:

1) EFR9180 power levels

2) Want to be able to get good pull from <4000rpm

3) An RB26

Remove the thing from that list which missing out on will bother you the least.  DON'T go with a .92 housing especially on a 9180, its not going to make it worth while.  It won't spool the way you want and it will also choke the compressor, worst of both worlds.

 

Response over power, definitely....

37 minutes ago, joe89 said:

What's the safe boost level for 8374 and 2.6 capacity till 8200? I don't have speed sensor :/ 

Can’t really put a pressure on it. 

How does the head flow? What cams? How restrictive is the cooler? The list goes on and on.

Buy one, put it in, wire it up. It’s not expensive.

Edited by Piggaz

Disappointing result with my dyno session on Wednesday due to a couple of issues. Got to 360kw at the wheels on 20psi on 98 and had clutch slip at peak torque between 4500 and 5500 rpm so we stopped there, egts are quite high too. New clutch time. I think a coppermix comp will hold an 8374 on a 2.6. I like the sprung hub and centre plate anti-rattle That the orc 1000F and osg R3C don't do. Clutch is just worn out as it used to hold much more with the -5s.

 

Had a look at the logs and at 360kw the emtron is reporting a calculated air mass flow of 450g/s (60lb/Min) at a pressure ratio of 2.4. Turbo wheel speed is 108k rpm. I've triple checked the scaling maths so I believe that number. PIGGAZ you might be able to help me out, the scaling on turbo speed  input on the kv8 is 3.43. The compressor map is saying I should be at 93k ish rpm so I think the stock bovs might be passing or I have a decent boost leak. Will replace clutch, check the boost piping and head back to wind her up.

Very impressed with the emtron software. Once you set up all the logging pages it's very powerful.

IMG_20180228_182858.jpg

5a987e5692cc2_turbospeed.thumb.png.2229f3c811b33fc39a962b7f42f8d54c.png

download_20180302_071659.jpg

 

download_20180302_072818.jpg

download_20180302_073136.jpg

Edited by burn4005
  • Like 1
22 hours ago, burn4005 said:

Disappointing result with my dyno session on Wednesday due to a couple of issues. Got to 360kw at the wheels on 20psi on 98 and had clutch slip at peak torque between 4500 and 5500 rpm so we stopped there, egts are quite high too. New clutch time. I think a coppermix comp will hold an 8374 on a 2.6. I like the sprung hub and centre plate anti-rattle That the orc 1000F and osg R3C don't do. Clutch is just worn out as it used to hold much more with the -5s.

 

Had a look at the logs and at 360kw the emtron is reporting a calculated air mass flow of 450g/s (60lb/Min) at a pressure ratio of 2.4. Turbo wheel speed is 108k rpm. I've triple checked the scaling maths so I believe that number. PIGGAZ you might be able to help me out, the scaling on turbo speed  input on the kv8 is 3.43. The compressor map is saying I should be at 93k ish rpm so I think the stock bovs might be passing or I have a decent boost leak. Will replace clutch, check the boost piping and head back to wind her up.

Very impressed with the emtron software. Once you set up all the logging pages it's very powerful.

IMG_20180228_182858.jpg

5a987e5692cc2_turbospeed.thumb.png.2229f3c811b33fc39a962b7f42f8d54c.png

download_20180302_071659.jpg

 

download_20180302_072818.jpg

download_20180302_073136.jpg

Didn’t see that you asked me a question, mate. Bin the stock recirc valves. There is no reason why they should still be on the car. Put one of those turbosmart units on the comp cover, turn it all the way to hard and see what it does. ?

14 hours ago, Snara said:

And why u are disappointed? Its 670hp at the engine on just 20psi. Very nice.

Just spool seems a little too weak. What are your spec? Engine, cams? ar92?

Disappointeded by the clutch not holding.

The plan was to max out the 8374 on e85 but had to hold off.

Power is good, but turbo speed is a fair bit higher than I expected it to be at 360kw. Piggaz my question was around what your turbo speed input scaling is set to in your emtron to make sure I've got it right.

New clutch and new/remove bovs and I'll hit the rollers again.

Nothing crazy. 1.05 a/r, 2.62L, poncams type B, kelford beehives springs. Running a 12 watt 4 port Mac valve that is controlling really well. Have linearised it so 0-100% on boost control output corresponds to 15-70% duty of the valve, which is the effective response range at ~13.5v

Edited by burn4005
  • Like 1
1 hour ago, burn4005 said:

Disappointeded by the clutch not holding.

The plan was to max out the 8374 on e85 but had to hold off.

Power is good, but turbo speed is a fair bit higher than I expected it to be at 360kw. Piggaz my question was around what your turbo speed input scaling is set to in your emtron to make sure I've got it right.

New clutch and new/remove bovs and I'll hit the rollers again.

Nothing crazy. 1.05 a/r, 2.62L, poncams type B, kelford beehives springs. Running a 12 watt 4 port Mac valve that is controlling really well. Have linearised it so 0-100% on boost control output corresponds to 15-70% duty of the valve, which is the effective response range at ~13.5v

Mate send scotty an email I’m sure he’d be more than willing to clear things up for you .

11 hours ago, burn4005 said:

Disappointeded by the clutch not holding.

The plan was to max out the 8374 on e85 but had to hold off.

Power is good, but turbo speed is a fair bit higher than I expected it to be at 360kw. Piggaz my question was around what your turbo speed input scaling is set to in your emtron to make sure I've got it right.

New clutch and new/remove bovs and I'll hit the rollers again.

Nothing crazy. 1.05 a/r, 2.62L, poncams type B, kelford beehives springs. Running a 12 watt 4 port Mac valve that is controlling really well. Have linearised it so 0-100% on boost control output corresponds to 15-70% duty of the valve, which is the effective response range at ~13.5v

Ahh that score is on E85?

When u have 14.5psi?

Here is my results 

EFR 8374 1.05 rear 

Nitto 2.7

heavily ported head

4” dump in to 3 1/2 “ exhaust 

FullRace Manifold  twin 38 mm tail gates

e85 and all supporting mods

The car feel and dives awesome 

graph is showing old -5’s 

 

27CD8775-9B84-4E58-961E-A0E60B6C8447.png

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...