Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 11/13/2016 at 8:00 AM, Deano 1 said:

wheres the best place to order one of these bad boys, should i be looking in the states or australia?

 

The cheapest place I have found selling them for are the following 2 places in England. I’m looking at a 7670 T4 external gate and the cheapest i could find in Australia is $2875, the 2 below are $2030 posted to my door.

http://www.hybridturbos.com/shop/borgwarner-efr-turbos/

http://www.turbodynamics.co.uk/shop/performance-turbos-borg-warner-efr-series-c-1050_1286.html

If you want to buy locally email mtq, munt-WA said he got a good price on a 9174 from them. Turbotech list their prices and are cheaper than anything advertised I could find in Australia

http://www.mtqes.com.au/

http://www.turbotech.com.au/products/performance-turbos/

  • Like 1
10 hours ago, Deano 1 said:

whens the sale start Full Race Geoff??

 

Hey guys, Our Black Friday sale starts today, lasts until friday 11/25.  SR20 manifolds on blowout for $799.  s200sx 7670 4" inlet $549.  s300sx FMW $699. Complete Turbo kits are $500 off (coupon code: fullr@ce500). E-mail questions to [email protected] - We are a small staff here and crazy busy this week, but send an email with shipping address we'll get back to you. thanks -Geoff
15068927_10154584195242527_2058852835802

 

 

I run Cartel Online ww.cartel-aus.com and can now source BW turbos. We will beat any price on Borg Warner turbos offered by any Aussie reseller and our website also has a price match request where we will also try to price match any international reseller (advertised international price + freight + 10% GST)

Not all models are listed but I am getting there... And Interest Free finance is available too

https://www.cartel-aus.com/product-category/enginebraking/borg-warner-turbos/

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...

OK question time. 

- What would be the best option for a solid 375-400rwkw in a stock bottomed RB26? Has headstuds, e85 setup, 76 plazmaman, cam gears already. 

- Could I potentially low mount this? 

- On what manifold? 

- Are we all agreed that the IW setup on these is good enough or is an external setup going to be better?

The goal is maximum response to improve over -9s on a street car. I may also move to Kelford L182-A cams and springs.

Will a 7670 get me there? My tuner just said a basic 3582R and a 6 boost would do, but these appear more responsive plus the smaller size means I have better chance of low mount. If low mount is too hard/expensive then high mount it will have to be. 

 

Edited by ActionDan
  • Like 1

400kw would be pushing it on an EFR7670 but high 300kw @ wheels with epic response should be doable.  I wouldn't rely on an EFR7670 being a lot smaller than a GT3582R, haven't seen one in person but they're not little things.  I'd definitely go external with an RB26, partly because you'd want the 1.05a/r hotside.

A GT3582R would clearly do it easily but won't touch the 7670 for response.  

 

 

Edited by Lithium

I tried to get my 8374 low mounted. 7670 is smaller, but only a little. Low mount isn't happening unless you find a solution for a gt35 low mount.

7670 ewg would Max out at your power goals. Should be a highly responsive turbo for the power.

Thanks Pete, are we talking max at 375 or max at 400? 

They're an ugly turbo to want to high mount. Dare I say the Precision is prettier to look at? When you see a full 6262 setup for $2300 (manifold, EWG, Dump. turbo, and lines) doesn't look like a bad option. 

 

Maybe @Full-Race Geoff may have some inside word on when the new EFR housings may become available?  They look a lot like the SX-E housings which imho are some of the nicest looking units on the market, a far cry from the ugly things currently available

 

This whole ugly turbo thing. Seriously guys, man up. You won't be worried about an "ugly" turbo when you're driving the thing. End rant.

What Dan said. 7670/1.05 would be an amazing setup on a RB26.

To draw a comparison, Benny from Benchmark tuning has put a fair few 7670's on EVO's. He says th basically drive like the factory EVO snail... but go onto make north of 400 Kw wound up. It would make the typical "-7/-9 2.6 build" look rather silly.

A bloke in the UK did that exact setup. From memory it went 575 HP. Can't remember fuel or boost as it was a while ago.

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/400338-r32-gtr-old-school-fun.html

Dan, link to build thread.

It was the 0.92 IWG setup, sorry.

Because total power is not just about what airflow the turbo can provide.

Fair to say 6L will make more power than a 1L yes? Adding the same turbo to each doesn't magically mean the 1L will now make the same output as the 6L.

So I'm surprised a 2L will make the same/more than a 2.6L with the exact same turbo.

Then again were talking 80s engine vs much newer design...

Because total power is not just about what airflow the turbo can provide.

Fair to say 6L will make more power than a 1L yes? Adding the same turbo to each doesn't magically mean the 1L will now make the same output as the 6L.

So I'm surprised a 2L will make the same/more than a 2.6L with the exact same turbo.

Then again were talking 80s engine vs much newer design...



Combustion efficiency vs air flow.

The increase in efficiency is rather small for your initial statement to be relevant.
5 hours ago, ActionDan said:

Because total power is not just about what airflow the turbo can provide.

Fair to say 6L will make more power than a 1L yes? Adding the same turbo to each doesn't magically mean the 1L will now make the same output as the 6L.

So I'm surprised a 2L will make the same/more than a 2.6L with the exact same turbo.

Then again were talking 80s engine vs much newer design...
 

Pretty sure you'll find posts on here (in the original EFR thread, in fact) that suggest that an increase in displacement will typically shift the power curve to the left, not offer you additional top end power.

22 hours ago, ActionDan said:

- What would be the best option for a solid 375-400rwkw in a stock bottomed RB26? Has headstuds, e85 setup, 76 plazmaman, cam gears already. 

- Could I potentially low mount this? 

- On what manifold? 

- Are we all agreed that the IW setup on these is good enough or is an external setup going to be better?

The goal is maximum response to improve over -9s on a street car. I may also move to Kelford L182-A cams and springs.

Will a 7670 get me there? My tuner just said a basic 3582R and a 6 boost would do, but these appear more responsive plus the smaller size means I have better chance of low mount. If low mount is too hard/expensive then high mount it will have to be.

Garrett's 3582R has an 82mm compressor and can reach you 400rwkw target

BorgWarner 7670 is a 76mm compressor, will be out of breath at 400rwkw but may work well for 375 and quick response

BorgWarner 8374 is 83mm compressor, and pumps out 400rwkw easily. 

Internal WG has its benefits (simplicity, cost) especially with EFR twins.  But when looking to run a single at high boost and high rpm, external WG is typically more popular.  it requires the gates, dumptubes, flanges/clamps etc

22 hours ago, Lithium said:

400kw would be pushing it on an EFR7670 but high 300kw @ wheels with epic response should be doable.  I wouldn't rely on an EFR7670 being a lot smaller than a GT3582R, haven't seen one in person but they're not little things.  I'd definitely go external with an RB26, partly because you'd want the 1.05a/r hotside.  A GT3582R would clearly do it easily but won't touch the 7670 for response.  

agreed

19 hours ago, Piggaz said:

This whole ugly turbo thing. Seriously guys, man up. You won't be worried about an "ugly" turbo when you're driving the thing. End rant.

oh the horror!  its so ugly i cant bear to look at it let alone drive it!  hahaha

Kenneth-TS-GTR-11.jpg

14 hours ago, ActionDan said:

Because total power is not just about what airflow the turbo can provide.
 

spend some time with matchbot, videos at the bottom of the page explain how to use it: http://www.turbos.bwauto.com/aftermarket/matchbot.aspx

21 hours ago, ActionDan said:

They're an ugly turbo to want to high mount. Dare I say the Precision is prettier to look at? When you see a full 6262 setup for $2300 (manifold, EWG, Dump. turbo, and lines) doesn't look like a bad option. 

Yeah that ugly integrated bov on the compressor housing that gets rid of 2km of factory bov pipe work out of your engine bay. Got a link for this brand new $2300 Precision 6262 kit?

 

21 hours ago, Piggaz said:

This whole ugly turbo thing. Seriously guys, man up. You won't be worried about an "ugly" turbo when you're driving the thing. End rant.

It's a gtr, it sits in the shed and you look at it not drive it :laugh:

 

If you can wait until May next year i will have results on my 7670 T4 external gate vs -7 twins.

  • Like 1
On 12/15/2016 at 10:01 PM, sneakey pete said:

I tried to get my 8374 low mounted. 7670 is smaller, but only a little. Low mount isn't happening unless you find a solution for a gt35 low mount.

7670 ewg would Max out at your power goals. Should be a highly responsive turbo for the power.

I tried out the 8374 and 7670 on an HKS bottom mount. Issue with the 8374 was the compressor inlet sits too close to the engine mount and also fouls the oil supply port on the block. 7670 sits much better, will have to use a sharp angle for the intake pipe right off the compressor to clear the mount. I'll dig up some pics and post them later. . .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Rotisserie is fully assembled apart from centre connector which obviously isn't required until the car is on it. It packs away fairly neatly and doesn't take up too much room. (Now that I actually have some room after my clean up!) Overall very happy with the quality of it.  Assembly was a piece of piss.  The only thing I didn't like was that the pins that lock the rotation lock wheels in place were a bit of a dick in a bucket scenario. It allowed the arms to rotate a significant amount even when locked in place.  To fix that i measured up the hole and went and grabbed a couple of 18mm fully threaded bolts and a thread tap to suit. I ran the tap through top and bottom so it was threaded both ends.  Then just threaded the bolt through both sides.  It has made a massive difference which hopefully you can tell in the before and after video how much difference it made. 20250207_161431.mp4   20250207_161431.mp4 Hopefully back working on the car over the next few weeks.   20250207_162801.mp4
    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
×
×
  • Create New...