Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Short answer: Daily driving? No.

Longer answer: It could theoretically be done, but you'd have to get absolutely everything spot on perfect, and anyone who can pull that off has enough self doubt to want to verify the setup works correctly... by tuning it.

A Nistune is what you want. If you cannot afford a Nistune + Tuning time, or a plug in ECU for the Donor ECU you are using (Haltech, Link or similar) then this project is out of reach.

Yes, its a large expense for a DE+T that might make 200kw. This is also still the cheapest option.

On 16/08/2020 at 12:49 PM, Kinkstaah said:

Correct, this issue happens because

1) The NA Auto ECU cannot accept a Nistune
2) A GTT Auto ECU cannot natively run the Auto gearbox from the NA car, because the NA car has a seperate TCU.

You can wire the the inputs to the NA TCU into the GTT ECU on the correct pins and bypass the NA Auto TCU. Nissan have the wiring diagrams of both units available in the shop manual.

This has only been done successfully a couple of times. It isn't that hard, about ~20 wires. All clearly labelled in the shop manual. People just never tried it, or had need to.

So does this mean a better option for an R34 de+t is to run a stand-alone ecu (power fc, adaptronics, link etc..) or still better to run the gtt auto ecu with nistune?

A Nistune is kind of a stand alone ECU. You'd want some kind of tunable ECU, it doesnt have to be the bees knees, but you'd need to tune it to do it properly, because a NA+T is _not_ a stock car/tune, and even stock GTT cars get tuned anyway.

Just keep in mind the GTT auto ecu will NOT run a NA auto without wiring the standalone auto ecu that is in the NA cars, directly into the GTT ECU. Which may only work in theory, but the same pins exist in the GTT ECU that are seperated (for some reason? Maybe a good one!) to the GT standalone TCU.

On 22/09/2021 at 7:29 AM, Kinkstaah said:

A Nistune is kind of a stand alone ECU. You'd want some kind of tunable ECU, it doesnt have to be the bees knees, but you'd need to tune it to do it properly, because a NA+T is _not_ a stock car/tune, and even stock GTT cars get tuned anyway.

Just keep in mind the GTT auto ecu will NOT run a NA auto without wiring the standalone auto ecu that is in the NA cars, directly into the GTT ECU. Which may only work in theory, but the same pins exist in the GTT ECU that are seperated (for some reason? Maybe a good one!) to the GT standalone TCU.

Okay I feel like I’m getting more confused as this goes on haha, so from what you’ve said above: to use the gtt auto ecu you need to wire it into the tcu to control the auto. ORRR you can keep the NA TCU and run a completely different ECU seperate?

If you have an auto (which most people do when asking this question it seems) you cannot use the GTT ECU to control it plug and play.

You also cannot just leave it as is, and let the TCU control itself. The TCU by default wants to talk to the GT ECU.

If you want to use a GTT ECU *only* you have to wire the TCU into the GTT ECU.

If you want to use a standalone ECU for the engine, you either piggyback that off the GT ECU (gl with that) or have a complete aftermarket TCU to control the gearbox.

Go manual.

  • Thanks 1
On 22/09/2021 at 12:41 PM, Kinkstaah said:

If you have an auto (which most people do when asking this question it seems) you cannot use the GTT ECU to control it plug and play.

You also cannot just leave it as is, and let the TCU control itself. The TCU by default wants to talk to the GT ECU.

If you want to use a GTT ECU *only* you have to wire the TCU into the GTT ECU.

If you want to use a standalone ECU for the engine, you either piggyback that off the GT ECU (gl with that) or have a complete aftermarket TCU to control the gearbox.

Go manual.

Okay that makes way more sense. Obviously manual swap is the way to go, but for now with the basic power I’m looking for I’d like to retain the auto (grown to enjoy the tiptronic). I’ve already got the GTT auto ecu so will just sort out the wiring side of things.  Thanks for taking the time to reply.

Keep in mind noone has ever documented actually doing it. But if you have the NA ECU/TCU diagrams and the GTT ecu pinouts you can see that the GTT has extra pins that correspond to the exact pinouts of the NA TCU.

I am ASSUMING you can join/bridge these up. ASSUMING.

At the time I noticed this, I already had an aftermarket engine ECU, and an aftermarket Transmission ECU. I noticed this when I was re-wiring in the aftermarket transmission ECU as I swapped from a GT chassis to a GTT chassis.

I too, wish I knew this information before I bought a haltech, and a $2000 aftermarket auto transmission controller.

If it doesn't work, go manual, the NA box won't live long behind a turbo motor anyway. Even if built. I know that one too, from experience.

I was always of the same opinion as Kinkstaah that using a GTT auto ECU would be complicated. If you've got the R34 service manual, pages EC11/12 show that GT auto and manual have the same ECU wiring that uses a separate transmission control unit and the GTT auto has the transmission control built in to it. Page AT3 states that plainly. As per the diagrams, wiring for manual GTT ECU is same as GT auto/manual so that's what I used on my auto NA+t. It works fine and just uses the original GT transmission control unit to look after the auto box. As mentioned above, popular opinion is that there could be problems if the transmission circuit inside the GTT auto ECU creates conflict or doesn't talk with the GT transmission control unit still in the car. Pages EC13/14 will show you which pins are different and what they control. On page EC11, pin 79 of a GTT auto ECU (multiplex communication) is shown as only being for TCS/ABS but on page EC12 for non-turbo it also goes to the separate GT TCU. Pages AT8/9 have the transmission circuit diagrams (top right corner on page AT9 shows the connections from separate TCU to ECU). If you're gonna give it a go, those refs might help and if you get it working report back to feed the knowledge base. R34Nur posted a couple of weeks ago and said it worked fine with auto GTT ECU but that does go against popular opinion.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

I think it can certainly be done, and upon reading the manuals you can see how it could very conceivably work as above. The workshop manuals are very direct and easy to interpret, surprisingly so!

I think it becomes hard because people do not read the manuals, do not have the gusto to compare the wiring diagrams and think "Well what if I...." and assume it will plug and play, which it won't.

It may however, be a wire-in job. It probably is, the only thing that throws me (personally) is wondering why Nissan went to the extra work of making two seperate systems in the GTT and GT. There could be some reason, but it may have absolutely no effect.

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...

It's your idle air control. Both for idle speed control all the time and for fast cold idle via a wax pellet valve that also lives inside. It goes on the back end of the DET plenum. You cannot live without it if you are using a factory ECU. You can live without it if you're using an aftermarket ECU, but you will need to do soomething else for idle control. From a simple 2-wire idle air valve, all the way up to a proper e-throttle.

 

@Jack_Dubz if you're planning on running Drive by Wire sure launch it. However I suspect you're not so that needs to go into your plenum as that's the idle control valve.

Also I recommend installing OEM coil packs OR Splitfires OR R35 coils, whatever you have there will end up being another topic on SAU asking why your car is misfiring.

On 07/12/2021 at 11:54 AM, GTSBoy said:

It's your idle air control. Both for idle speed control all the time and for fast cold idle via a wax pellet valve that also lives inside. It goes on the back end of the DET plenum. You cannot live without it if you are using a factory ECU. You can live without it if you're using an aftermarket ECU, but you will need to do soomething else for idle control. From a simple 2-wire idle air valve, all the way up to a proper e-throttle.

 

too fast, too furious

The Price of EVERY Car From 2 Fast 2 Furious! - Ideal

On 07/12/2021 at 6:52 PM, GTSBoy said:

Did. You. Not. Read. The. Replies?

Just found an adaptor thanks for your help.

 

For anyone looking for the adaptor here it is. https://otakugarage.com.au/product/otaku-garage-rb25det-neo-iacv-adaptor-for-series-12-iacv-flange/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...