Jump to content
SAU Community

Garrett vs Precision

khezz

By khezz,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Piggaz
Piggaz

Considered an EFR 8374? 

33GTRV
33GTRV

A 6466 with a 1.0 rear will make 600awkw. With a .84 it will make a comfortable 550awkw. Alot of tech nerds seem to hate on a lack of compressor map but the results dont lie. Turn it up and have fun

Mick_o
Mick_o

Thats right! I remember there was something about that back to back that stank lol what shit kunce posting shit up like that ?  I've driven 2 cars with both of those turbos & i know which 1 i

Piggaz Grand Master

Piggaz

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, khezz said:

Slightly off topic but do twin scroll manifolds really cost $2.5k? Does that include the twin waste gates? Is it cheaper for an Efr since it doesn't need a waste gate?

Really surprised.

6 boost manifold = $1,300 ish

Fullrace manifold = ALOT more, depending on exchange rates.

Twin 38 or 44 mm gates, $450 ish each.

Depening on how you set up boost control. 1x3 port MAC valves or as crazy as 2 X 4 port MAC valves = $120 - $360 depending on which way you want to go.

Braided lines (you'd have to have rocks in your head to run rubber). This ain't cheap. Well over $1,000 here in lines and fittings. Gets a bit out of hand when running lines to the top and bottom of the diaphragm with duel 4 port MAC valves.:cool:

Water and oil lines = Not quite sure. Haven't added that up.

 

IWG EFR would be a fair bit cheaper. No gates and not as much plumbing pain with the lines. No fab work with plumbing the gate pipes back in. That itself is an expansive exercise.

Piggaz Grand Master

Piggaz

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, khezz said:

Suppose this makes BW a fairly popular choice. That and they seem like a really well designed and made product.

Well that's a IWG version only (0.92). 1.05 and 1.45 ass ends are external gate which would make them the same cost to setup as choosing another brand (with however you decide to set it up).

khezz Rising Star

khezz

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Why Lol? I've been told that higher lift helps greatly with response on turbo engines. I know longer duration only comes in at high revs. Please explain, I'm not being sarcastic I would genuinely like to know if I've been steered wrong. My rb26 is about to go through a full rebuild and one of the items on the list is 11mm cams with 264 duration. The idea is to help response/reduce lag.

r32-25t Grand Master

r32-25t

Posted
Posted

Higher lift help a lot with power and maybe a little response but longer duration is a massive detriment to response, it's actually surprising how little duration it takes to have a big effect  

Piggaz Grand Master

Piggaz

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, khezz said:

Would 0.92 still flow enough for 500AWKW+ ? I imagine it would spool up well. Especially with well matched cams and E85. Maybe add a slightly higher comp ratio.

I suppose it depends on what dyno you throw it onto. What would be good is to see the exhaust gas pressure difference between a 0.92 and 1.05.

You have a 79 lb/min turbo. Why choke it with a small ass end? Let it breathe!!!!! In AND out!

For the record, the 1.05 AR ain't laggy AT ALL, especially if you have pulled off/come from "responsive twins" ?. Don't let the number scare you away.

Piggaz Grand Master

Piggaz

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, khezz said:

Just watched this video thats seems to put a little dent in the BW EFR. Its a back to back test of the 8374 vs 6266 on the same car and the 6266 wins quite comprehensively. They use a 3.4L 2jz supra. the EFR does spool quicker but the power difference is huge.

 

 

A car set up for and running an open T4 turbo from the brand they are dealers for (Precision) then they get a divided T4 turbo and put it on the same open manifold, somehow that turbo still makes >700whp and spools better than the Precision despite god knows what awesome stuff happens when the gases suddenly meet a brick shaped fork in it's path.

Somewhat BS comparison.

Mick_o Grand Master

Mick_o

Posted
Posted

Thats right! I remember there was something about that back to back that stank lol what shit kunce posting shit up like that ?

 I've driven 2 cars with both of those turbos & i know which 1 i would rather have strapped to the side of my motor ?

  • Like 3
Ryan1200 Proficient

Ryan1200

Posted
Posted

 

13 hours ago, Piggaz said:

A car set up for and running an open T4 turbo from the brand they are dealers for (Precision) then they get a divided T4 turbo and put it on the same open manifold, somehow that turbo still makes >700whp and spools better than the Precision despite god knows what awesome stuff happens when the gases suddenly meet a brick shaped fork in it's path.

Somewhat BS comparison.

http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?668656-The-Big-Thread-BW-8374-EFR-vs.-Precision-6266-CEA-(Jourbal-amp-DBB)-DYNO-RESULTS

If you want the actual facts of that comparison there posted in the above thread unfortunately it requires a account to access the page. 

The manifold is a copy of a HKS T4 divided single wastegate. In the above thread people complained about the HKS manifold not being a true divided design with twin wastegates so SP racing carried out further testing of the same turbos comparing a true twin scroll dual wastegate fullrace setup against the HKS manifold. 

Make up your own minds with the facts available.

http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?672553-Hks-full-race-t4-exhaust-manifold-test-results&p=8809015#post8809015

 

khezz Rising Star

khezz

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Higher lift help a lot with power and maybe a little response but longer duration is a massive detriment to response, it's actually surprising how little duration it takes to have a big effect  


So what would be your recommendation for cams. For the type of setup discussed in this thread. 2.6l, e85, 750-800hp turbo. Going for 500kw at all fours?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • TurboTapin
      CD009 RB Conversion

      By TurboTapin · Posted

      Thanks for the info. The only "Issue" I've had with the shifter is I always found the throw between 4th and 6th gear too close. I'm always worried to shift into 4th accidently and sending my motor to the moon. Adam LZ recently came out with a video and stated Serialnine revised their shifters to correct this and will change all the revised parts for 150$. Strangely enough, I contacted Serialnine right after and they denied it and said it's bullshit. I found that strange as he's a distributer. I'll keep this forum post updated on that saga.
    • Nightmare_mistress_R33
      CD009 RB Conversion

      By Nightmare_mistress_R33 · Posted

      Yep that is correct. It allows you to adjust the short throw range from what I can tell
    • TurboTapin
      R32 GTST - 600KW+ RB28/CD009 Build

      By TurboTapin · Posted

      Car has been running great, I've put about 300km's of break in time on it. First thing that stands out with properly sealing rings is no more noticeable crankcase smell coming out of my catch can. This may seem insignificant, but the constant smell while driving around was infuriating. It's also nice to see my oil level remain stable. Two new issues have developed that I only noticed this weekend though. There's a very noticeable driveline vibration past 100kmh. I only noticed it now as I've been babying it under 100kmh in the backroads. This comes as no surprise as I'm running a one-piece shaft, and I paid zero attention to my driveshaft angle when I put everything back in. I also have a fair bit of voltage drop on hot starts. The starter audibly is forcing. No issues on cold start though. I must not have removed all the paint under my main block ground during assembly. I'll try and take care of both those issues this week once the kids are asleep.  I also received all the parts I was missing for my direct port setup. I will hopefully have pictures of that up soon. I'm hoping to get back on the dyno the week of June 30th as I'll be on vacation. I'm confident I should be able to make north of 500rwkw on pump gas and WMI. I'll go back again later this summer with E98, but I want to confirm my ethanol content sensor is working properly first. I've never seen it read anything but 11%. This makes sense for our 10% ethanol content pump gas here, but I would expect the occasional movement between fill ups. 
    • jez NF
      The Evolution Of "night Fury"

      By jez NF · Posted

      75% complete. Will now need to get a new axle with 5x114.3 hubs and then figure out how to customize some mudguards for it once the wheels are on.
    • jez NF
      The Evolution Of "night Fury"

      By jez NF · Posted

      Trailer prep is underway... Lined up the wheel to get a rough indication of how it would sit Then removed all the bits (as far as possible) and gave the frame a light sand and quick lick of paint   Then added some carpet
×
×
  • Create New...