Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have this really annoying problem with my auto R32 Gts-t. It only happens when switching from light throttle to no throttle at low speeds. For example, driving in traffic or in a shopping center car park (just tapping the accelerator). As soon as I release throttle, it starts hunting and hesitating, gets all jerky, then snaps back into normal idling.

It only happens at light throttle, any ideas?

I've check the TPS. I'm getting proper voltage readings, approx. 0.5v closed and 4.0v WOT, and switches between throttle open and closed properly... Is it possible the TPS is at fault even if it's giving proper readings?

What else could cause this issue?

Thanks heaps.

Edited by rayj

I would have pointed the TPS but you checked it already. 

Isn't the tps for auto different than the manual one ? I think it should have an idle and WOT contact on the TPS as well.

Otherwise dirty maf sensor maybe.

The variable voltage output on the RB20 TPS is only used by the transmission's CU.  The ECU knows nothing about it.  The ECU looks only at the closed throttle position switch.  The very best way to make sure that an RB20 has the TPS adjusted correctly is to use your hand on the bellcrank* to just crack the throttle open the tiniest amount.  What you want to happen is the switch to change state at almost no movement in the throttle at all.  You will hear the injectors double fire (which is what the RB20 ECU does when it sees the throttle switch change at idle).  Basically the sound of the injectors clicking just speeds up to double rate for something like 2 rotations of the engine (ie <1/2 a second).

The single most likely thing that is wrong with your engine is that the throttle body and/or the idle control valve are full of grunge and need a clean. The idle control valve being the most likely.  What is happening is that when the IACV is dirty the stepper motor on it struggles to make it move fast enough to change position.  When you are running with the throttle open, the IACV is too closed to run the engine at the right speed.  When you then close  the throttle the revs drop low while the IACV tries to open up.

You need to dismantle it and soak it in carby cleaner, give everything a good scrub and put it back together/on.

Thanks for your help. The Throttle body was taken off the car, cleaned thoroughly, then mounted back on with new gasket and torqued to spec. Much the same the entire AAC unit, completely soaked and cleaned thoroughly.

The problem still exists

I've checked for vacuum leaks, cleaned the AFM and tried resetting the TPS again. Same problem continues...

What I've noticed with the TPS, if I test it with Consult without the engine running, everything looks good. Closed throttle is approx. 0.5v and throttle switch is closed. As soon as throttle is opened, throttle switch changes to open, and throttle position will gradually rise to approx. 4.0v WOT.

However, as soon as I start the car, the throttle switch will immediately move from closed to open even though the throttle hasn't been touched (it's closed).

So then I adjust the TPS accordingly while the car is running, so that throttle switch open/closed occurs at the right time, all looks good, but the problem still persists.

This doesn't seem right, the output should be the same no matter if in the ON position or engine running. Why is the closed throttle value changing between ON and engine running?

The throttle will either be rotating a little because of air flowing across it, or possibly there is bearing slop and it is just moving in some other direction under the force of the flowing air which turns up as a change in the TPS.  Ultimately it doesn't matter what the TPS says when the engine is off.

to get the correct contact position for the throttle...

warm up engine, disconnect AAC valve connector, rev engine to 2000 then slowly ease off the peddle until the idle switch light illuminates to indicate throttle closed position, taking note of the revs the exact moment the closed position light comes on, this should be 950RPM +- 150RPM if it is not then adjust to suite. This why the tps voltage specifies 0.4 to 0.5 Volts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...