Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

rb25 86.5 mm bore and Genuine head gasket????

Can anyone tell me if using a genuine head gasket on a 86.5 mm bore will be ok? 

 

I know the gaskets aren't spot on but just unsure and would rather use genuine all round then Anything else especially with the tolerance issues that come with metal gaskets

 

 

Edited by Azztrix

AFAIK, the stock gasket is designed to work up to the maximum over-size bore allowance. So as long as its not above maximum spec (40 thou over I think) the gasket should be fine. Are you just doing a stock rebuild?

Just have always liked genuine gear and I can get a full engine genuine gasket kit for 350 bucks
But I'll stew on it a little more....

If I do go cosmetic or another then I'll have to get the head decked too I guess hey?

Another question if you know the answer what's the go with gtr pumps on 25's? Worth doing? Do they need restrictors in the head or no?
I can get gtr genuine pump for 350$ or a 25 pump is bloody Close to 500$

MLS gaskets require a better surface finish then std gaskets. If the head and block were surface finished they may be O.K but if not I would def go with the std gasket

I have an N1 pump with billet gears. Best to fit oil restrictors etc. Check the oil control thread in forced induction

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The smart thing is to actually locate the pump at the right point down the hanger, so that the strainer can stay sticking out at a right angle, but near the bottom. This is the perpetual hassle with retrofitting any different pump to the factory hanger. Some just go where you need it to, some need fiddling and faffing, and modifying of stuff.
    • Some updates. After a lot of praying and some inspecting of crank threads, we've found that they were both kinda munted but nothing seemed terminal. The other option was drilling and helicoiling the crank. That is obviously the last option so we decided to at least try to get a OEM GM bolt in to GM Specs. So after honing/linishing the balancer from it's .002" interference fit to a .0018" to .0015" to .0013" it eventually slotted on to the crank. ATI state the interference is nominally 0.0007-0.0009... so it's still snugger than ATI reckon and explains the issues we had to fit the thing to begin with. New GM bolt went in at 37 ft/lb then torqued 140 degrees after which was EXTREMELY   but it tightened up to 140 degrees and it was a lot of force. So all things considered, the balancer is secured to the exact specs that GM want with the OEM Stretch bolt, (that ATI say you can use..) and the balancer itself is seated and snug AF. So WOO. Engine is now back in the car with lots of swearing. Bellhousing bolts done up, driver side manifold is on, AC Compressor and hard lines are back on the car. Next step will be to connect various engine bits/wiring/intake/radiator etc. Then oil and coolant and ... test start it? And of course, looking into this issue... which actually doesn't look so bad - It looks like it can be twisted back into shape with a set of multigrips. Anyone wanna buy my bonnet? Boy it looks good over there and sunk cost sucks.
    • Also this may be a stupid question, but how would you recommend getting the strainer on a downwards angle ? as they tend to obviously clip to the bottom of the pump which usually sits level 🥴
    • Most of the R33 GTST S1 are all like "airbag? What airbag?!"
×
×
  • Create New...