Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

E85 on BNR34 with standard fuel lines...

Hi all,

I was recently told that the fuel lines on BNR34's are actually smaller then BNR32 & BCNR33's... and I know that the ideal setup when running E85 is replacing the standard lines with full braided or Teflon lines, but I wont have the $$$ or time to get that them in time for WTAC in less then a weeks time.

So my question is this, Is anyone running their R34 GT-R on E85 with the standard fuel feed lines???

As im only aiming for around 330-350 kW's at the rears would I still need to upgrade lines? 

Cheers,

Glen
 

Feed and return at the same time drill little holes on the jet pump siphon whatever it's called.

Best to convert to an fittings or use a R33 lid (if it fits.. should I think).

Plugs are different on the R33 lid. R33, S14 and S15 lids all fit but plugs are different haha.

 

The size of the fuel line itself is not the issue its the fuel hat itself the plastic inlet and outlet are very restrictive.

 

That being said I you will be able to make the power you are after without touching the hat at all. I made 400awkw or so with a standard hat.

  • Like 2
  • 11 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Big single, and seqy. #sorted
    • The R32 suffers from an instrument binnacle that is uncomfortably close to the design of a VN Commodore's. But beyond that, the layout of the rest of everything, and the materials (ie the vinyl coverings on dash, armrest, etc) are acceptable, and the patterns on the fabrics are not as blergh as those in the R33. And R33 seats are....quite unattractive. I know it's only small details there, but I reckon the R33 got worse than the 32. But the big blergh is the overall shape of the dash on the R33. It's just has that whole Maxima/Pulsar sort of look to it. Nothing special at all. Generic Nissan sedan. Whereas, at least the R32 dash/binnacle was different. Less a wide expanse of boringly curved plastic. More a "cockpit" sort of look, even if nowhere near to the degree that the A90 Supras got. R34 seats look good on their own, until you realise that they are indistinguishable from the shape and fabric on 70 other Japanese cars. And the foam bolsters on them suffer even worse than the earlier cars. Other than that I don't really have an opinion the rest of the R34 interior. I took the bits of the R34 I wanted (brakes and engine) and added them to the best external appearance Skyline in the modern era (the 32). So nyerr!
    • Can I be your first customer? I would like hard lines done for the fuel system, 8AN up and 8AN back and the underside wire wheeled and coated (brush or sprayed) with that black tar shit.
    • Speak for yourself, I love the R33 interior. 32 is blergh. I like the 34 interior too. Then you start getting much newer in most cars and they all turn back to blergh. 馃槢
    • 500-600hp into a RB is already 'sinking endless amounts of money' into an engine. Especially a 30 year old engine. Unfortunately this is the RB Game. Considering stock power (or at least stock components) will do ~360whp on 98 by simply turning up the boost on the stock gear on a RB26, that would be where I'd say the cutoff point for "sinking endless amounts of money into the engine" Cause to even do this reliably you'd probably need to replace all the bits anyway cause they're old, starting your sinking journey anyway. I reckon the least painful way is rebuilding the engine to make 50hp over stock lol. The 'plan your ownership around a rebuild' was a common saying 15 years ago.
  • Create New...