Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Can anyone give me information, pro and con's about these three different types of Fuel Pressure Regualtors?

Do they all do the same job as well as each other?

The nismo item looks like the stock reg, but with a screw on top, where as the malpassi and sard are more solid, robust units. Would this affect their performance?

I''m just a little confused with these products.

Cheers

Dave :headspin:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46722-malpassi-vs-sard-vs-nismo/
Share on other sites

I queried between sard and malpassi at gavin woods and his response to malpassi involved some fairly heavy language which I possibly shouldnt repeat in polite company. It wasnt a positive response, put it that way.

I dont actually remember what brand he did reccomended over all, but I know sard was a name that cropped up as a "good" one.

ok thats a technical response slapper... but WHY??

is it because its not a jap brand... is it because it costs 1/3 the price of the Sard?

Gavins reasoning (minus most of the more colourful words) was that the malpassi couldnt maintain its set pressure between full boost and idle, especially after a hard run then quick back off. You would see the malpassi holding full boost fuel reg pressure even at idle, or vice versa (ouch!)

Also the build quality was "shit" and "typical of italian crap" and "I wouldnt even throw one on at my worst enemy". ... Thats not entirely verbatim :)

lol nice.

well thats the sort of info i want. I do know that the malpassi's work as i've used one on a previous car with no drama's, but i just want to justify the $300 odd for a sard or nismo item.

Cheers krawler

thats my other query.

The nismo's look like the stock fuel reg, but with a screw on top (the one i owned did anyway)

How do they go at controlling boost? are they rising rate etc? Their small design makes me abit wary of them...

Look at the nismo one that bolts on. It looks like stock.

All it does is restrict fuel on the return.. how can a different brand really have that much difference?

Skyline-Dave. How can it control boost..? And unless you running enough fuel for 4000HP I can see the small size hurting?

And I would say the Nismo one is all you need.. they have been proven to work. Rising Rate is not always a good thing.. you should use tuning to get the fuel right.

Can anyone give me information, pro and con's about these three different types of Fuel Pressure Regualtors?

Do they all do the same job as well as each other?

The nismo item looks like the stock reg, but with a screw on top, where as the malpassi and sard are more solid, robust units. Would this affect their performance?

I''m just a little confused with these products.

Cheers

Dave  :headspin:

Dave;

I've heard only good things about SARD, and Nismo aren't known for making junk. That said, make sure you need one before you spend the $.

yeah i've got a bigger fuel pump, and injectors will be >660cc i have decided.

I want to make sure i am going to be completed protected on the fuel side of things. Hence asking all the questions. Alot of money is going into My RB30DET and the GT35R will be wound up in boost pressure.. so i want make sure i'll have adequete fueling.

^rising pressure reg. are usually 'band aid' fixes people use to flow a little more then what there injectors can handle with normal fuel pressure... and as most band aid fixed its best to do the job proper and just get bigger injectors

ive also heard similar bad things about the malpassi, and have been recommended the sard over it, reason given was that the malpassi cant hold a steady fuel rail pressure, and well if that is the case, then its a pretty pathetic product really isnt it

yeah i've got a bigger fuel pump, and injectors will be >660cc i have decided.

I want to make sure i am going to be completed protected on the fuel side of things. Hence asking all the questions. Alot of money is going into My RB30DET and the GT35R will be wound up in boost pressure.. so i want make sure i'll have adequete fueling.

i recommend you not even go with the fuel regulator, run stock fuel pressure, and run bigger injectors if your running out of fuel, IMO, if your increasing fuel rail pressure to make up for lack of fuel, then your injectors are too close to 100% duty cycle anyways, and again in that case its a safer option to go with bigger injectors, if you want to be safe, which you say you do

pushing the injectors too hard will increase the chance of something going wrong, your spray patterns are also affected when you push the pressure too high

You can also push some more current through the pump to raise the static pressure....

I think.,

mmm i doubt it will, unless you have a shitty regulator, the pressure is simply a result of the restriction from the pressure regulator and it should accomodate for any extra flow and keep its pressure consistent, although its a common DIY trick to upgrade the wiring to your fuel pump, so you get less voltage drop + more current to the pump, which increases its FLOW, not pressure

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Save yourself the headache of an alarm. Immobilizer on the signal side of the main EFI relays so it won't start is good enough. DIY killswitch is the same thing except instead of a nice passive system you need to remember to switch it on and off.
    • Yeah, the advent of canbus was supposed to cut down on wiring weight, then some bright marketing wonk says "oh, look at all these wonderful tech gadgets we can cram in here now that we have this wonderous technology" and some arsehole safety legislator says "oh, look at all the wonderful surveillance and tracking gadgets we can cram in here now that we have this wonderous technology" and some dipshit young engineer who has grown up thinking that an extra 500000 lines of code is not a problem because storage is cheap these days says "oh look at all this wonderful shit I can do to one up those dipshit arsholes over at VW" and the Karens of the world all go "oh look at all these fancy things I can do on my screen (so long as I am not driving on a bumpy road wherein touch screens immediately become the single most stupid shit idea ever shoveled into a car) and my 19 zone airconditioning keeps my sweaty fat folds a bit less damp and the windows close themselves because I'm too fat and lazy to wind them up for myself and these reversing sensors would have been great if I'd paid attention to them instead of smashing them on the bollard while I was reversing and staring fixedly forward that day I went to pick up little Charlize from ballet" and the sweaty mongoloids who say "oh this wonderful collision avoidance technology with these 45 excellent radar antennae scattered across the front of my car mean I can tailgate like a methed up tradie at full speed with no fear because the car and the 35 airbags will protect me if it all goes wrong" ...... </shallistopranting?>
    • There's a post from a member (can't recall who), went down the path of a twin scroll G30-660 and it's doing over 300kW+ AND comes on about the same as a high flow RB25DET turbo. Have your cake and eat it too in this case. TBH, if I had a 2nd chance of building my car again (i.e. someone gave me what I wanted for my shit box, but the deal was I had to re-build another R33 and keep the change) I would just pop in a stock NEO motor (with new seals, rod bearings, ARP studs, head gasket, sump, Nitto pump), get a smaller twin scroll turbo, modify the stock low mount (keep the divider in place), and make a solid 300kW on 98RON and call it a day. 
    • It's all the sound deadening, and extra shit piled into them, plus all the extra (even though it's thinner) material for crumple zones. I can't fathom in modern cars why they need canbus to the headlights, and why the headlights must be vin coded on some cars to the ECU, BCM, and security module! Especially when they claim it's for security, yet, the canbus at the headlights let's thieves steal the car in minutes, so even more cars are being stolen! The Mercedes Sprinter 907 vans. They're a huge van, but a "basic" van. Yet they have that many canbus networks, plus two Lin networks, AND an Ethernet network. Logging a single network alone of 8 byte data frames, and they will generate a 20mb log file in 5 minutes. That's one network, and I can't remember the exact amount, but there's over 10 full CAN2.0B networks in them. I'm not a fan of modern cars, oddly, more and more I hate DBW, and all the bullshittery the cars try and interfere with. But all that bullshittery adds weight, plus crazy regulations on crumple zones, plus, ever picked a modern seat up, half of them have like 4 electric motors in them and will weigh 30+kg each. Then all the motors for things like adjustable steering columns blah blah blah. And did I mention the sound deadening so you can even hear an ambulance right behind you even if you 7.2surround sound is off?
    • Ah ok, yeah it should be flat, I believe the r34 battery tray has these 3 bumps in them they makes it line up and everything is flat, don't see how it would tilt if everything is secured.
×
×
  • Create New...