Jump to content
SAU Community

Quiet twin plate? Cusco Copper

Anti
 Share

Recommended Posts

Anti Enthusiast

Anti

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'm wondering if anyone has had road experience with the above clutch.  I'm trying to work out if there is a multi plate clutch that doesn't rattle like hell.

http://www.cuscousainc.com/products/drive-train/twin-plate-clutch-system-358.html

Reportedly they are made by Exedy for Cusco.  It's hard to confirm whether the "strap drive" is unique to Cusco or if it's even worth writing home about.

Any feedback?

 

- A

Edited by Anti
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MrStabby Grand Master

MrStabby

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Anti said:

None yet.  But when it's all together (with a non slipping clutch), enough that lots of switched on people have told me a single won't cope.

Ok, so are you going to have a built motor, and make something over say 350awkw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sneakey pete Grand Master

sneakey pete

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Anti said:

Even with the clutch in?

Exeddy with approximately 50% wear, very sight rattle when cold, gone before get to the first turn after reversing out of the driveway. I guess technically that means it does rattle, but realistically you don't notice it nor really take head, its not a reason on its own not to have one, of that brand at least.
My mates nismo: none that i can remember, but i'll ask the owner as he'd know his car better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Anti Enthusiast

Anti

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yes, more than 350kw.  I'm trying to keep this thread clean so it can be a reference to anyone else that comes aross it - just wondering about quiet twin plates.

 

That's interesting about the Exedy.  It seems to depend who you ask... and one or two people say the noise cuts down a lot when you wear it down, which makes some sense logically.  Everyone seems to rag on OS though, haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      PRP RB26 cast block + head prototype running

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • V35_Paul
      Thinking of getting a Q50 300hp and just tuning it instead of getting the Q50 Red or 400R

      By V35_Paul · Posted

    • joshuaho96
      PRP RB26 cast block + head prototype running

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • V35_Paul
      2020 Nissan Skyline 400R V37/Infiniti Q50 RS insurance in NSW

      By V35_Paul · Posted

      https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • V35_Paul
      Head Unit Wiring Diagram

      By V35_Paul · Posted

      Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...