Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

New Q60 Infiniti

The 2-litre model is due out in Q4 but they are pretty secretive on the RRP, same with the 3-litre TT model in 2017.

I don't know about you guys, but these cars look amazing! I'm surprised at the lack of discussion on these cars...

 

I test drove the Q50s a few weeks ago and it handles very nicely. You definitely feel the difference from the V36! Can't wait to have a look at the Q60

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/467491-new-q60-infiniti/
Share on other sites

50% in 5 years is darn good resale value.  bought my wife's J31 Maxima at 22 months old with 40,000km for less than 50% new price, but they have poor resale.. most cars will hit 50% after about 3 years and those with good resale, about 4.

But we are talking private sale price, not dealer used car prices.. they are always way over inflated.

Front looks good, rear looks good but at the side view, it looks cheap. I think it's the chrome edging around the windows. Not because I own one but I prefer the look of my 2009 V36 over that. It just seems classier.

Otherwise, a twin-turbo 3L pumping out around 336kW, yes please!!

  • Like 1

Because they are the only 2 formats Nissan have built with the VR30DDTT so far, unless they have some secret version they are going to release into the Aust delivered Q60, but I think that is fairly unlikely.

Perhaps they were building a higher output version for the Tau Rouge, and Caradvice.com assumed that is what they were going to use?

http://www.boostaddict.com/content.php?7277-Nissan-s-VR30DDTT-twin-turbo-V6-delivers-more-than-advertised-400-horsepower-Q50-Red-Sport-dynos-374-rwhp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_VR_engine

https://conceptzperformance.com/blog/the-vr30dett-nissans-new-twin-turbo-engine/

http://www.drivingenthusiast.net/sec-blog/?p=32297

 

true.. but the info was more about the engine rather than what car it is in.

I haven't seen any credible information on a factory 336kw version of the VR30DDTT yet.  Would be nice if they do release one, but I have my doubts Australia would be the first market to get it.  In fact history suggests Australia usually misses out on any tweaked versions they ever build.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...