Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

New Q60 Infiniti

The 2-litre model is due out in Q4 but they are pretty secretive on the RRP, same with the 3-litre TT model in 2017.

I don't know about you guys, but these cars look amazing! I'm surprised at the lack of discussion on these cars...

 

I test drove the Q50s a few weeks ago and it handles very nicely. You definitely feel the difference from the V36! Can't wait to have a look at the Q60

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/467491-new-q60-infiniti/
Share on other sites

50% in 5 years is darn good resale value.  bought my wife's J31 Maxima at 22 months old with 40,000km for less than 50% new price, but they have poor resale.. most cars will hit 50% after about 3 years and those with good resale, about 4.

But we are talking private sale price, not dealer used car prices.. they are always way over inflated.

Front looks good, rear looks good but at the side view, it looks cheap. I think it's the chrome edging around the windows. Not because I own one but I prefer the look of my 2009 V36 over that. It just seems classier.

Otherwise, a twin-turbo 3L pumping out around 336kW, yes please!!

  • Like 1

Because they are the only 2 formats Nissan have built with the VR30DDTT so far, unless they have some secret version they are going to release into the Aust delivered Q60, but I think that is fairly unlikely.

Perhaps they were building a higher output version for the Tau Rouge, and Caradvice.com assumed that is what they were going to use?

http://www.boostaddict.com/content.php?7277-Nissan-s-VR30DDTT-twin-turbo-V6-delivers-more-than-advertised-400-horsepower-Q50-Red-Sport-dynos-374-rwhp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_VR_engine

https://conceptzperformance.com/blog/the-vr30dett-nissans-new-twin-turbo-engine/

http://www.drivingenthusiast.net/sec-blog/?p=32297

 

true.. but the info was more about the engine rather than what car it is in.

I haven't seen any credible information on a factory 336kw version of the VR30DDTT yet.  Would be nice if they do release one, but I have my doubts Australia would be the first market to get it.  In fact history suggests Australia usually misses out on any tweaked versions they ever build.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meanwhile, 20+ years ago, I pulled out the 105mm hole saw and went straight down through the inner guard in front of the airbox to get my stormwater pipe cold air intake in. Right behind the two stock holes for the intercooler pipes. Those have no reinforcement (apart from a couple of robust pieces of steel pipe through them!). I feel that the Australian vehicle standards crews put way too much emphasis on "maintaining the crash performance" of cars and not enough consideration of "any crash is a new and wonderful experiment with a random selection of parameters and you will never be able to tell if an extra 80mm hole through some sheet metal caused a significant difference...but if you close your eyes and squint at the whole structure, engage your engineering brain and have a good think about it, you'd have to expect that it would do jack all."
    • You guys are focussing on the wrong part of this post and have headed off on an irrelevant tangent!  Clearly I'm not going to put my most prized physical possession (well it will be once I'm finished it...) on a piece of shit contraption that might fail and crush me or my car!  At no point was that even implied I was trying to buy a butchered P.O.S that some shonky clown had thrown together with a gasless MIG....  Either way I would love to see the build quality of a rotisserie that has failed.  Actually I'd love to see a photo of one that has failed full stop.  Google fails to deliver.  Never happened?? I'll either make one that won't fail or will buy one that wouldn't fail! End Post.....
    • Yeah, if you can't breathe for more than about 2 minutes, you're cooked.
    • Well, all the power should be getting dissipated across the starter motor. Therefore, ideally, the voltage drop across the earth lead should be convincingly close to zero. Certainly you'd want it to be only a volt or so at max, because otherwise that volt doesn't turn up at the starter to do what is required. A car can probably survive a bad enough earth to crank and start with only 9V or so at the starter motor, maybe even a bit less. But you're seeing only 8V at the battery terminals when cranking, so there can't even be that much available over at the starter, which simply won't do. I would have thought that you couldn't pull enough current (with a healthy starter) to make the battery drop to 8V locally. But I was ignoring the possibility that the starter is in fact crook. If it has shorted windings (or maybe the solenoid is borked and shorting to earth) then I guess it could pull a stack of current and not even look like wanting to turn over. So follow the other boys' reccos too. Because they are just as likely at this point.  
    • Depending where the whole gets drilled, and what country/state you're talking about, quite likely not.   Under ole vehicle mod rules in NSW, VSI06 allowed for drilling of holes in "non structural" areas. So you could drill a hole through the inner guard, and not need engineering. You couldn't drill over seams, and it was advised to add extra reinforcing around the hole, as well as something to protect from sharp edges.   Again, it's all about finding the documentation for where the mod is to be done, AND then being able to explain the situation, with the documentation as to why you don't need engineering, with a positive attitude, to any one of the likes eg, police, vehicle inspector, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...