Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Pretty sure only no, only the AR-X has. But the easy ways tell is to lift up the car and spin the wheels right? Nissan factory Customer's had the option to pick of many features. Maybe the original owner ticked that box?

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...


Yu are dead right again Hertz , bugger me mate, I knew when I bought it was not commodore, but I wasn't aware I had won the bloody jackpot, fu*k me Hertz I've never won so much as a chook raffle. Now I got all these blokes telling me what a lucky cu*t I am.
My grand pop used to say "stop shouting and wavin about, cause everybody else will want one too" . Well I can't give yu mine but I'll post a few more pics , if yu want to drool a bit.

Hey stix, not on mine as far as I know , and can't see it mentioned on the specs list but it is supposed to be bits from an r 33-4 so it could have knowing those cunning little Japs, not sure if it was an option or standard new, but the mechanic, (hi John) at heartbeat cars Syd is a staggie nut, who got it in said it does. Apparently the reason why they are hard to import is the 3.5 on a 2.5 chassis. This one squeezed through on the 2.5 platform I am reliably told

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
    • As well as being risky WRT tipping off anyway. Yeah, I wouldn't expect it to move. Just measure from the rear one to the front one on the good side, then measure that same length on the wrecked side. You will find the notches in the pinchweld, and the jacking pad. Just spray a spot of marker paint or something there.
    • but any other area than the bulge you are talking about will just cave in then? The front driver side is pretty bent so I don't know if that will work the way it is now. I can still kinda make out where that bulge is/was but it looks like the position of it also changed due to all the mistreatment? Hard to tell
    • Absolutely. Look very closely at the photo (of yours) that I took my second snip of. See how the sill is thicker material right behind the pinchweld, where the two notches are? That is the factory reinforced area for lifting. That pad is supposed to carry the weight. The factory jack (go look at it, and how it interfaces with the car at the pinchweld) shows you exactly how the load is carried from the car to the jack to the ground.
×
×
  • Create New...