Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lets talk Open Wheelers/Lightweight NA track cars.

Is anyone here playing with open wheelers for track day fun? 

I like the idea of something lighter, NA and hopefully less maintenance/tuning/cooling hassle/cheaper on tyres and brakes than my turbo S13 track car. 

Or are these things prohibitively expensive to buy/maintain? 

Failing that, what other small/lightweight track cars have potential to go quick? I see MX5s are popular but I also see people sink bulk coin into them before they're quick. 

 

  • Like 1

I don't think that would work for my local DECA facility where my car club runs sprint events. I have seen a lotus 7 style thing there, but nothing smaller. 

Same goes for fun days/test and tune days at Winton. 

Fair call... other than mx-5 but in the same league (actually not really cause FWD) I'd consider a Hyundai Excel or a Nissan Pulsar, purely because they Excel cup and Pulsar Challenge there's plenty of support for making these cars trackable

At a recent sprint I attended a Hyundai Excel was 0.1 second slower than the fastest (being a Radical)

  • Like 1

I've seen Excels punted really hard and on decent tyres they seem be far more capable than they should be 0_0

These looked very cool given the humble MX5 beginnings. 

http://www.racingclassifieds.com.au/index.php?page=item&id=54

 

 

  • Like 1

Yeah I think a "good" one runs you quite a few dollars though, by good I mean the race version with full cage and potentially a boosted motor. 

If we say my Silvia at full weight with me in it is 1200-1300kg? It makes 200rwkw so 6-6.5kg/per kW and that thing weighs between 660-700 I think depending on donor parts used.

If we say 700-740 with me in it and we could maybe squeeze 100rwkw out of an NA MX5 motor (I'm guessing, I have no idea) then you end up with 7-7.4kg/per kW. If you could get a mild boosted platform (say low boost supercharged setup) and get it to 140rwkw or so then things look nicer. 

I realise there's more to lap time than power to weight and that thing would kick ass through the corners and most likely be faster even with a worse power to weight as it can maintain higher corner speeds once moving. 

I'd need to drive one :) There doesn't appear to be much in the open wheeler space for reasonable $$ so I can  see why MX5s are so popular. 



 

Thats the bottom end of the market. If you want a front running Stohr you will need $70k and for a Radical it will be $100k. Then add another $3k of running cost per event per day.

Oh i also forgot a $20k enclosed trailer if you want to go interstate. Break a rear wing? $3k, break any of the 3 piece bodywork is another $3k each, undertray / diffuser on a Stohr? $5k, Radical spec engine rebuild? $12k, replacement engine? $20k, quality safety clothes helmet hans etc? $5k.

"But it will ruin the weight balance!!!!"

Quoted from the forum. 


The problem would be finding one, I have little desire to build another track car. The Silvia has so many hours in it. 

Just buy a 7.  Cheap as you like or as expensive as you want it to be.  Plus they are very quick on the right hands.  Not Radical quick but it the track has corners they will more often than not beat a Skyline.  Their aero is a bit like a brick wall, however.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
    • yeah, there's a country that recently started importing Skylines, I blame them.
    • I don't have a printer, but could at least attempt to make a printable model.
×
×
  • Create New...