Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just looking to see some feedback and opinions on changing from a stock intake to a forward facing style.

It seems like a fairly pricey thing to change and would take some labour and adjustments under the hood.

It seems very logical to run a forward facing plenum for many reasons. I would like to know what effect you felt it had on your car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/467997-rb25det-forward-facing-plenum/
Share on other sites

Look 100x better, 100000x easier to change/upgrade injectors, easier to change spark plugs... little bit of stuffing around to convert but nothing major. Much shorter inlet path.

Would be interesting to see if someone has done a back to back comparison on a near stock motor with no changes other then the intake... When I did it I changed injectors and turbo at the same time so cant really compare

  On 03/12/2016 at 1:38 AM, Clintox said:
Look 100x better, 100000x easier to change/upgrade injectors, easier to change spark plugs... little bit of stuffing around to convert but nothing major. Much shorter inlet path.

Would be interesting to see if someone has done a back to back comparison on a near stock motor with no changes other then the intake... When I did it I changed injectors and turbo at the same time so cant really compare


I asked for back to back results on the same tune a few years ago. From memory someone did post results and they were in line with what everyone else says. The theory and results behind the plenum is almost the same as na, which is surprising.

Yeah they look good and you can clean up all wiring and coolant and fuel lines to fit below it. But it's still around $400 for a useless thing.
Have around $400 spare and want something to do? Go for it

I have talked myself out of non standard RB25 manifolds and plenum chambers so many times it isn't funny .

Just yesterday I was looking at a pretty blue Freddy going onto a GTS25T and asked again the shop owner does this cost torque and drivability right where cars are driven most of the time .  Quick answer , yep more top end but costs down low . 

It is also very obvious that things like the thermostats housing and oil filter are considerably harder to get at . No crossover pipe but that's not real hard to remove once you've done it once or twice .

I think the reality is that the J pipe or whatever is the way to go or if being real stealthy you're stuck with return flow type intercoolers .

The factory alternatives are the RB26 setup or the Y pipe and plenum like some R34 RB20/25 DEs use .   

I've got one on my motor,why? For bonnet clearance when my 25 was in my 180, now I still have it on my 32 as bonnet clearance with an rb30 and because top feed standard hight injectors.
More top end? Barly noticeable at 300kw, however there was a noticeable loss of low-end/midrange power on the rb25 can't comment on the difference with the 30 thou

  • Like 2

i have back to backs with 320rwkw greddy and plazmaman vs std and in both cases there was very little difference and there was zero difference between std throttle and q45 on the greddy at 350rwkw.

That said the extra accessibility was worth it on both cars as they see lots of track work.

  • Like 2

I have talked myself out of non standard RB25 manifolds and plenum chambers so many times it isn't funny .

Just yesterday I was looking at a pretty blue Freddy going onto a GTS25T and asked again the shop owner does this cost torque and drivability right where cars are driven most of the time .  Quick answer , yep more top end but costs down low . 

It is also very obvious that things like the thermostats housing and oil filter are considerably harder to get at . No crossover pipe but that's not real hard to remove once you've done it once or twice .

I think the reality is that the J pipe or whatever is the way to go or if being real stealthy you're stuck with return flow type intercoolers .

The factory alternatives are the RB26 setup or the Y pipe and plenum like some R34 RB20/25 DEs use .   

  On 15/12/2016 at 7:33 AM, discopotato03 said:
I have talked myself out of non standard RB25 manifolds and plenum chambers so many times it isn't funny .
Just yesterday I was looking at a pretty blue Freddy going onto a GTS25T and asked again the shop owner does this cost torque and drivability right where cars are driven most of the time .  Quick answer , yep more top end but costs down low . 
It is also very obvious that things like the thermostats housing and oil filter are considerably harder to get at . No crossover pipe but that's not real hard to remove once you've done it once or twice .
I think the reality is that the J pipe or whatever is the way to go or if being real stealthy you're stuck with return flow type intercoolers .
The factory alternatives are the RB26 setup or the Y pipe and plenum like some R34 RB20/25 DEs use .   

  On 10/12/2016 at 6:30 AM, discopotato03 said:
I have talked myself out of non standard RB25 manifolds and plenum chambers so many times it isn't funny .
Just yesterday I was looking at a pretty blue Freddy going onto a GTS25T and asked again the shop owner does this cost torque and drivability right where cars are driven most of the time .  Quick answer , yep more top end but costs down low . 
It is also very obvious that things like the thermostats housing and oil filter are considerably harder to get at . No crossover pipe but that's not real hard to remove once you've done it once or twice .
I think the reality is that the J pipe or whatever is the way to go or if being real stealthy you're stuck with return flow type intercoolers .
The factory alternatives are the RB26 setup or the Y pipe and plenum like some R34 RB20/25 DEs use .   


Groundhog day?

I've never regretted mine, but it was part payment for some wheels. Car has always driven fine
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm hoping I just don't have to do an engine rebuild NOW. Doesn't mean I won't do it at some point. I think a plus point is that the car presumably ran on or close to stock power nearly all it's life so far. Only the Owner I bought it from actually increased power with a standalone ECU and blew the OEM turbos. And after it got thee 2860s it wasn't driven an awful lot either.   That is what I meant. With the twins coming on so late (4500-5000rpm) I hope the rods won't want to exit the block prematurely. And it still being a 26 means the torque curve isn't gonna hike up all that much.   It didn't blow up on the dyno when they tuned it to 500ish crank. So I suppose it'll be okay for now. They did put a Tomei head gasket on first though which did not seal at all, and they redid it with a Cometic one. Which I hope won't be my water leak.   Mainly anything oil. So far all it has is the N1 pump, oil restrictor and a filter relocation kit with a cooler.
    • 15000? ish? Something like that anyway. It wasn;t so much a wear as a tear that then spread. Might have lasted a lot longer if not bothered by just one incident, whatever it was. I took a punt. They are really comfortable and do a good job of holding. My daughter HATED it when I first put them in, and probably still does now. She has sensory issues and hates the way they are all up your business. I'm 197cm and 95kg. Not fat or particularly wide, and the XL size seat is the rigth fit. If I was any fatter it would start to get too snug. Any skinnier and you'd possibly want the smaller width.
    • Mrs rs focus came factory with recaro cs  sportsters in it and they a pain in the ass to get in and out of with the really high bolsters, once you were in them they were one of the most comfortable seats I have ever sat in
    • The NA 2.5 has very little torque. You won't feel much. Those trannies are also a million years old now and it could well be f**ked. First generation electronically controlled autos will often refuse to kick down, ete, etc, depending on what's wrong with them.
    • Yes, but no but yes but no. Those "it's fine up to 500HP" rules and everything else like it were all determined back when the cars were 10 years old. As they are now 30 years old.....what do you reckon the chances of something shitting the bed are? I'd say they are much higher now than they used to be. You might be lucky. You might be unlucky. Spin the wheel and find out. Yeah, nah. It's actually exactly the opposite. Making boost early and having heaps of torque able to be generated right in the middle of the rev range will do more to damage an engine than having to rev it high to make the power. Think about the load on the conrods, bearings, etc, to make 400HP at 4000 rpm, vs 400 HP at 6500 rpm. So someone has already "let the Nissan out" which is how we describe the increased chance of a fiddled with engine to have had something done wrongly. Many more engines that have been opened die than stock ones do - even if you into consideration how they are treated wrt power levels and the like. Again, not saying that yours will definitely have been put back together by a moron. But the possibility does exist. It's still a lottery. Spin the wheel. What weakspots?
×
×
  • Create New...