Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I was wondering if there was anyone around that could point me in the right direction of either someone specific to talk to or some reading material of suspension design. I have read a couple of books like "how to make your car handle" etc but all the books i have read more lean towards bandaiding existing suspension design. Nothing i have read talks about starting with a blank canvas like i am wanting to do.

The car and intention is an R34 GTT that i have been building as a Sports Sedan, so circuit racing. With the rear end i have been trying to work with it but with all the suspension working as imaginary piviots and all the subframe piviots being off axis etc i am having a mission of a time working it all out and i think going back to basics and the old KISS principle will be beneficial to me in the end. FB_IMG_1483172870787.thumb.jpeg.1b6533f0

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/468404-double-a-arm-suspension-design/
Share on other sites

To be honest suspension is best done on software - it will let you work out, for example, how much camber compensation you get in roll and a bunch of other things.  Which software to pick may be your question?

For a sugestion:
Analysis Techniques for Racecar Data Acquisition by Jorge Segers is not the worst book by any measure.  Sticking point is you need a high level logger to record data on things like damper movement etc.

Also have a look here:

http://www.bosch-motorsport.de/en/de/downloads/software/software_1.html

 

http://www.carrollsmith.com/books/index.html

Carroll Smith has some good detailed info on nearly all aspects of race cars.

I had "engineer to win" but I can't find it now. It had good info about material use in race cars as well as suspension info.

  • 3 weeks later...

If that image is your actual car, that toe base might give me some concern.

Can think of several people who have built multiple sport sedans over the years who are usually up for a chat, without knowing where you are though, best to join the State club and someone should point you in the direction of who to consult. As mentioned though, most do it via software nowadays, even if they're more comfortable with a drawing board.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
    • Yeah since those first 2 replies I actually went and put some 98 in it and tbf it's already doing much better than the 95 (which is weird and makes my inner tinfoil hat wearer think the 95 was a crap batch), getting 8ish around town. Again, wonder if it takes a while to stabilize if the fuel is changed a couple of times. I swear cars used to just either run "well" or "s**t* in my 20s, none of this fuel optimisation business haha 
×
×
  • Create New...