Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been reading the "this low rmp idle problem"  thread - or whatever it is called - and 'the phantom' reckons that a thing called a dashpot is the go

 

From what I understand - it attaches to the TB - and lets the butterfly open quickly,  but close slowly - which fixes the reversion problem ..

I was about to suggest you read that thread, but then I saw you found it yourself :)

The dashpot sounds like an interesting idea, however when my car had the problem I found I would have to release the throttle *really* slowly to not stall. If that amount of slow throttle release happened every time I think it would be at least annoying, and at most dangerous to drive. I found that I could rev it in idle and then let go quickly and it wouldn't stall, it seemed to only stall if I was slowing down from normal cruising speed. Yours may be different, I don't know, but the EIDS thing seems like it might do a "smarter" job.

Just one question, hope it's not too obvious - Did you teach the PFC to idle with the 10 minute idling thing? Before I got my PowerFC I had the stalling problem fairly bad. When I taught the PowerFC to idle it was still there but muchly improved. And after a couple more weeks of normal driving without actually "teaching" it to idle, it seems to have cured itself. It still does happen very rarely but I can't remember the last time it did. You might want to wait and see if it improves of its own accord before spending money on things to fix it.

I did let it idle for quite a while - more then 10 mins

But I didn't follow the demister, A/C procedure outlined in that thread - I wonder if that makes a difference ? And I wonder if I can do it now - or do I have to reset my PFC (and loose the tune) - or would just powering it on and off by disconnecting be OK ???

Oh and you don't have to release the throttle that slowly for it to not stall - id these dash pot things are designed for this purpose - I don't see how it would be bad for the car - (as long as they don't leave it WOT obviously).

In my case, I have the Q45 infininity throttle body - maybe the spring rate is too tight or somehting - and it closes way to quickly..... ??? I dunno.

Oh, not so much bad for the car as wasting fuel, and possibly having the car not engine-brake as much as you'd like (which could be bad for certain road conditions). The PowerFC won't lose its tune if you disconnect it, as far as I know it should only lose its idle tune, and even then I'm not really sure it does that. It may well be a continual thing, and it requires at least 10 minutes to override all the previous settings. Which would explain why mine has gotten gradually better even though I did the full 2 or 3 lots of 10 minutes (I forget how many now, but it took ages).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...