Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently purchased an r33 gtst series 1. Understood it needed abit of work to getting it up to a nice proud standard. Drove it for a month and noticed it was getting worse to drive so I changed back to the pulsar to drive, bought a couple thing to get back upto scratch, the first on the todo list was the fuel pump to stop the bucking when accelerating and to cut back on the fuel burn. Seen how to do it seemed simple enough, after doing fuel pump my car has not been able to start, cranks but no start. I have noticed a cat over heat light on when trying to start then once I stop it turns off and the check engine light comes on, can any one give me any ideas on how to fix this problem or any ideas on what this problem could be. Could it be in the rare occasion of a dodgey fuel pump? I haven't driven it in about 2 months and just want to go for a nice drive. Any help is appreciated.

If it was running before you replaced the pump, it's odds on that something in that area is the problem now.

Are you sure the new pump is physically installed properly? I've done this job a few times, and it's not the easiest thing to seat in the bracket. If it isn't in properly, and if the tank level is low, it may not pickup any fuel.

Are you sure you plugged the cables back in properly?

What fuel pump did you install, and did you have to redo the wiring (ie to fit a Wahlbro or similar pump)? If you've reversed the wire polarity the pump will run, but you won't get fuel to the injectors.

Can you hear the pump start running when to turn the ignition on? Get someone to help so you can get your ear in the boot.

If you've got someone to help you, you can remove the a fuel line (feed or return) from the fuel rail, and turn the ignition on - you should get fuel flowing (preferably into a container, not over the engine).

If you are competent with auto elec stuff, you can hotwire the fuel ump fairly easily, so it runs all the time.

... what would the battery have to do with anything?

what made you think the fuel pump was making the bucking issue, sounds like an afm issue or ...well any of the massively covered problems with hesitation. how did you diagnose the problem to the fuel pump?

why would a fuel pump issue cause fuel burn? surely it would cause a leaning out issue?

work your way back, check whatever you have touched and see what is wrong. once its fixed i bet my balls your original issues are still there. search about hesitation/ bucking issues and work out whats actually wrong.

and if it hasnt been driven in a while do a service, fluids, filters, spark plugs, the basics :thumbsup:

I went over coils and plugs nothing was wrong with them I went over a couple idea with the mechanic and he said it was common for the fuel pump to do such things, it was a big hesitation on acceleration and major bucking too, looked up a couple things on here and the few I looked at said fuel pumps to after they checked coils and spark plugs. I thought the battery may reset the ecu or clear code or do something

  • 2 weeks later...

So turns out with after market pumps they turn on when connected wrong just don't pump, but when connected correct they still turn on and pump like they should. Problem solved. Running like a monster :) so this is what a gtst should feel like :) thanks for the assistance guys

On 1/12/2017 at 11:15 AM, GeeDog said:

If you've reversed the wire polarity the pump will run, but you won't get fuel to the injectors.

I posted this reply to you on Jan 12th - what have you been doing all this time?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, the latter. No diff should have a centre replaced without checking clearances because its unlikely to be the same as whatever came out. Not that that stops most people just checking a new centre in
    • Major thread necro but how bad of a job is it to DIY? Looking at it online it looks like if you reuse your ring and pinion as long as those are in good condition it should be fine to just pull the axles/front cover and replace the diff that way? Or should I be replacing everything and doing preload measurements/gear mesh testing like the factory service manual mentions for the rear diff?
    • in my list I had the R33 GTR as the best Skyline. Infact I had all GTR's (33>34=32), the NSX, the GTO, the 300ZX, the 180SX, the S15 better than the FD RX7. I had the MR2 and the A80 as 'just' better. I also think the DC5R Integra looks better but this is an 01 onwards car. I also think the FC>FD. It's almost like aesthetics are individual! The elements @GTSBoy likes about the FD and dislikes about the 180 are inverse in my eyes. I hate the rear end of the FD and it's weird tail lights that are bulbous and remind me of early hyundai excels. They are not striking, nor iconic, nor retro cool. The GTO has supercar proportions. I maintain these look much better in person (like the NSX) especially with nice wheels and suspension which is mandatory for all cars pretty much. Some (or all) of these you have to see in person to appreciate. You can't write a car off until you see one in the flesh IMO. Like most people we probably just like/dislike cars which represent certain eras of design or design styles in general. I also think the 60's Jag E type looks HORRIBLE, literally disgusting, and the 2000GT is nothing to write home about. FWIW I don't think the Dodge Viper Gen1's have aged very well either. You can probably see where I rate bubbly coupes like the FD. I know we're straying now but the C4 and C5 absolutely murder the Viper in the looks department as time goes on, for my eyes. Wouldn't surprise me if people who love the FD, also love the MX5, Dodge Viper, Jag E Type, etc etc.
    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...