Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm selling my car because I am at a point in my life where I need to prioritise money for other things that aren't cars. Your douchbage levels astound me.

Menthol were those the timing numbers when aligned with the marks on the RB25 backing plate?

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
On 15/01/2017 at 10:43 AM, KiwiRS4T said:

That explanation doesn't make sense to me. Saying that  the printed mph/kph figure is too  unreliable to convert to rpm means you have given up on getting accurate data. . Given that for many purposes the ecu requires an accurate rpm signal it would seem that the tuner hasn't gone to enough trouble to make the necessary connections to get a proper rpm reading. 

Seeing videos of people sitting in the boot of cars trying to stop tyre slip on dynos is another reason why i think hub dynos are by far preferable.

Ok, Basically dyno doesn't actually read rpm for any of its primary calcs except derived torque, the power and motive force are calculated directly off road speed based on pressure applied to the load cell, then you have have a few other calculations going on to get derived torque based off either an input on the dyno to measure rpm or off a user set rpm based off road speed. so the primary scale for all dynos is actually road speed on a roller, or hub rpm on a hub, (hub rpm is very different to engine rpm) to get rpm readings on some cars can be a real prick, even with you have inductive and primary based pickups, as some cars especially ones with msd units will fire more than once giving really stupid readings on inductive pickups if you cant access the tach output on the msd box (very common occurrence when idiots have mounted the box right up under the dash behind alot of crap)
also the rpm pickups are sensitive to interference that can make them unreliable at times, my own person car that works well on my dyno 95% of the time still has the occasional run where the pickup gets some interference off something else on the car and gives me readings of like 30krpm, where as because the road speed pickup is always dead accurate to the result. (not saying the dynos road speed is the same as actual road speed as tyre slip and crap puts that out a fair bit,if you have a decent tach input and graph rpm vs kph you can see this very easily )
in terms of tuning, the only time it really matters is it makes it a bit quicker to do the ramp testing high load stuff yet even then there's still delays in fueling from wide-band placement and how quick the engine accelerates means your rarely adjusting the 5krpm cells for a issue with 5krpm on the plot and as far at steady state lower load situations all the ecu side of tuning, the tuning software and logging software on the laptop your tuning with gets a perfect rpm signal direct from the ecu your adjusting (sometimes this signal can be fed direct to the dyno to depending on dyno and ecu brand and what level of options you have on the dyno) so in terms of tuning the dyno having the rpm reading isn't a huge advantage all the time.
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Result of another R35GTR build. Similar specs as above except this is running our bigger size SS-2 profile option. Made similar power except this car runs on Pump 98 fuel. Build specs are: Nissan R35 GTR 2015 model stock engine and box. ETS street intercooler boost logi intercooler piping with tial bov, boost logi turbo inlet pipe ID 1050 injector DW 300C fuel pump Decatted oem down pipe and y pipe& HKS exaust 3inch intake pipe Upgraded actautors HyperGear SS-2 high flow option Final result is 639whp / 477wkws hubs, Ron 93 / P98 fuel at 20psi.  
    • Duncan:- it affect both sides.  Driver side is worse.
    • That seems like a very special issue!  Does it affect both sides? Either way, I would disconnect the driver's side switch and see if it still happens, noting that might require removal of the whole door card which is a bit of a pain (it does on V37 and HY51)  
    • MBS206:- The windows start to slowly open themselves. GTSBoy:- Battery is new since Dec. 
    • I currently have a 2008 370GT Coupe, with the big brakes (Akebeno if I'm correct), and Its coming time to get new pads. Previously, I had a 2003 350GT Coupe with the stock sized brakes, not Brembos. I had custom wheels on it that were pretty open to the brakes, and when I first put the wheels on it, the rims where completely coated with brake dust. A few years after adding the new rims, I needed to change to pads on that car. I didn't do any research, but I told the mechanic of the problem with the brake dust. I also told him I didn't track the car or even drive around the streets harshley. But the dust was an issue. The mechanics changed the pads to a different compound, and the dust was GONE! The other change I noted was that when coming to a complete stop, instead of having to press harder on the pedal as I approached 0kph, I had to actually lift off a little to not come to a hard jerky stop.( My unfounded explanation is they became stickier as they heated by stopping ) Since I got my 370gt with big brakes, I noticed that that as I came closer to stopping, I had to press harder and harder to reach a full stop. I am not talking about hard, just harder. I brought the car in from another state, so when I had a blue slip done, I asked the mechanic what he thought of the brakes, and he thought they were brilliant. The only negative of these pads on the 350GT, was that they squealed when cold. So driving out of a shopping center carpark, it was a little embarrassing, as the brakes squealed, and I am sure people thought that I needed new brakes, when they were actually fresh. I have no idea of what type of compound they were on the 350gt, but whatever it was, I want to get the exact same on my 370GT. They weren't ridiculously expensive, and were replaced at the local JAX (which is no longer open), so I am certain they would be a pretty common big brand, off the shelf type/brand. My current mechanic suggested I need top get the rear pads changed soonish, but he suggested standard Brembo pads. Which I expect to behave the same as the current ones and not like the ones on the 350GT.  I don't think dust will be an issue on the 370GT. With the behaviour I describe above on the 360GT, does anyone have a suggestion of pad material that will act like the change I had done on the 350GT?
×
×
  • Create New...