Jump to content
SAU Community

R34 GTR Intercooler choice for 350awkw


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, TXSquirrel said:

Is Greddy or HPI intercooler no good?  With shipping to the States, they will cost less than Plazmaman for me.

My car has a HPI Aluminium Radiator. It did the job on a super hot tack day (38 degrees).

I can't comment too much, but it seems to do the job. You should probably value the opinions of the others over me though... they've been around a while longer than me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hadouken said:

^^ especially, seeing as the topic is intercoolers...

Damn it! Well, i proved my own point, i guess.

I don't know what intercooler I have, guess i will have something to look at tonight.

Edit: ok, having acheived peak stupid today, i'm going to log off and go have a nap.

Edited by Steve85
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am reading this post because my bnr32 is having high IAT issue.  

During normal driving when ambient temp is below 30C°, my coolant temp would stay between 75C°-80C° as I have Nismo's lower temp thermostat.  However the IAT is consistently showing above 50C°.  If I'm idling for a while in stop-go traffic, the IAT would creep pass 55C° while coolant still staying below 80C°.

Is that normal?  Is my factory intercooler not working properly?  Or there are other issues at play?  I figure it couldn't be the fan or fan clutch because coolant temp reads just fine.

Car is still all factory, down to the air box.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a look where the intake temp prob is. It's basically measuring engine bay temp/heat soak. The AIT sensor is the same unit as what's in the radiator.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The IAT sensor currently in the car is a brand new Nissan OEM.  My first thought was a bad sensor so I bought a new one, but reading is the same.  

The new sensor looks completely different tho, it's a much thinner rod and the plug is blue instead of yellow.  To make sure I got the correct part I even tested both new and old sensors in hot water to see if the ohm readings are in range, which is probably what I should have done before I went and bought a new one...

I also notice my car smells quite rich, but I'm not sure if it's because I have a straight pipe or the ECU is compensating for high IAT readings.  However as far as I can tell the lambda readings off the factory narrow band are normal.  Unless the Greddy Infometer I'm using is getting every reading wrong...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your readings are coming from the Infometer?

You said that you checked the sensor using water before - could be worthwhile checking the resistance output of the sensor using a multimeter hooked up during running to confirm that its not the Greddy being a bit optimistic.

Are you using a stock ECU?

Edited by baron_von_bootsector
forgot the ecu question
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ActionDan said:

He already checked the resistance he said. 

Where abouts is the sensor located. 

If the Greddy is the only way you can read that data, my guess is the calibration is wrong. 

The car would drive like shit with 50deg intake temps/

Yep thats what I was getting at, check the output of the sensor while its on the road to confirm the Greddy is not the issue. A few feet of wire and some alligator clips and you are set.

Edited by baron_von_bootsector
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything is stock in the engine bay and so is the ECU.  The IAT sensor is still at its factory location on intake plenum, at the kink before first throttle body.

Infometer is pretty much a plug-n-play off factory consult port, only the AFM and O2 voltage can be adjusted/calibrated.

I have swapped around the sensors a couple times with the factory radiator one and a 2nd new OEM one (yeah I bought another one just to be triple sure :(), same result...

4sensors_50.jpg.35f2ebd86e8c0b7f7855f630d5ee5812.jpg

At least car doesn't drive like shit, I think... well, this is the only bnr32 I have ever driven...  So I do hope Infometer is showing false readings, because I don't want to drop $650 USD for a new intercooler when the factory unit is working fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Factory core good for 300rwkw+ without issue at all.

Might be time to extend/alligator clips and do some more testing in other locations/outside engine bay etc.

Any Nissan dealerships around you/import shops that might have a proper consult so you can get a readout from the ECU?

You cold also buy a consult cable and use ECUTalk (which I think was free). 



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The RB26 IAT sensor is not really doing a good job of measuring the air temperature.  It really reflects the plenum temperature, which is often a lot hotter than the air.  For this reason, the RB26 ECU doesn't look at the IAT for any normal fuel-air or timing input.  It's really only there for the ECU to go into a panic if it get seriously hot.

So before getting too worried about the IAT sensor, the infometer, or anything else, I'd suggest slipping a skinny wired thermocouple bead under a hose clamp after the intercooler and try to measure the air temperature more directly.  Or install a proper IAT if you want to go banzai on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without wishing to go OT, how is it that the RB26 IAT sensor measures plenum temp rather than air temp? Doesn't that suggest that no matter where and IAT it is it'll measure the temp of the thing in which it's sitting rather than the air? What does the RB26 ECU use for normal fuel-air or timing input?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it hardly protrudes into the airflow at all and isn't insulated from the plenum at all so just heart soaks as the plenum temp increases. Yes it will rise with IAT but won't be very responsive at all. ECU will use AFM, O2, Knock and coolant temp to calculate fuel injection from memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Scooby32 said:

What does the RB26 ECU use for normal fuel-air or timing input?

That's just it....it doesn't use IAT for those things.  Most Nissan ECUs from the era (like all other RBs that is) don't even have an IAT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...