Jump to content
SAU Community

18" Rays forged on GTST


Recommended Posts

18" Rays forged on GTST

I've just swopped the Rays Forged 18" wheels that was on my 350z with the 19" deep dish wheels on my GTST. The tyres on the front are 225/45/18 and the rears are 245/45/18.
The Rays were fine on the Z but rub badly on the GTST. 
The fronts seem to touch the wheel arch liners. Not sure about the back.

ET is 33 front, 30 rear iirc.

Are the tyre sizes wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 19" wheels I took off were 9" front (ET30) and 9.5" rear (ET35)   235/35/19    245/35/19 

The Rays I put on were 8" front (ET33) and 8.5" rear (ET30)   225/45/18    245/45/18

i could take the front arch liners out but in the land of rain that's not really a good idea ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, enter those numbers into an offset calculator and you will see what the effect of having an inch less width and almost the same offset does to the locations of the inside and outside edges of the wheel rims.

But here's a thing.  I can see from those numbers straight away that the Rays wheels should project inwards by ~10mm LESS than the bigger wheels.  So they should not be scraping anything because of offset differences.  BUT.  And here's the big but.....the 18" wheel&tyre combo is ~12mm larger in OD than the 19" combo.  So they will possibly rub just from being too tall.

FWIW, both of those wheel/tyre combos are too tall.  The correct OD for OEM wheel&tyre is ~642mm.  Your 19" combo is ~647mm, which is acceptable, but the 18" combo is ~660mm OD, which is just stupidly large.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only simple if you know what you're doing bud. I don't so that's why I'm asking the question to people who do. 

My apologies if if I'm asking the simplest questions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I can see that reducing  the tyrewall to 40 saves me almost an inch on the front and exactly an inch on the back.

Can I ask what the oem wheel diameters are? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hudders said:

Thanks. I can see that reducing  the tyrewall to 40 saves me almost an inch on the front and exactly an inch on the back.

Can I ask what the oem wheel diameters are? 

R33 GTST is stock on a 16" wheel.  Should be a 205/55 tyre on that, which gives an OD of 632.5mm.  This is also true for R32 GTR's 225/50-16 OEm fit.  You can see why I said some of your other combos are stupidly large.  Oh, and I made an error in my previous reply saying that the stock diameter was 642.  I meant 632mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow !!  I see what you mean.  :2_grimacing:  

So if I changed the fronts to 225/40's  I'd only be 5mm larger than OEM.   The rears though, changed to 245/40's  would be 20mm larger.  

Do you think the rear arches could take that increase?  The car isn't lowered and is on standard suspension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rears can probably take it.  They don't have to steer, just go up and down, so they generally have less problems with clearance.  I personally wouldn't do it.  The gearing change is bad for speedo accuracy.  Being a turbo car, you can probably happily live with the taller gearing.  Taller gears makes the turbo work harder in each gear, which I think is better.  It's worse if you're a drag racing weenie though.  They like short gears.

The biggest problem with staggered wheel fitments is what you're going to do about the spare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...