Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Springs/Suspension Shop Stuff Around

Hello experts,

So in short, I've vowed to take the lowering spring/shock combo over the coilovers option and have weighed this up and researched it for ages. So that's that out of the way before anyone recommends coilovers for my daily driver.

I'd had my car booked in to fit 50mm lowering springs (Kings) and some work done to custom fit a Venom 5"cat," for two weeks now, only to get a call the night before to say they don't make springs to drop 50mm and would have to get 30mm's and compress them, taking weeks and more $$$ and generally frustrating me.

Im now thinking about sourcing my own springs (Tein S Techs) but the drop rate is very vague - 15 to 50mm.

I'd also stumbled across these in my research and was wondering if anyone had any experience between the two: http://www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/performance/coilover-suspension-kits/car/nissan/skyline-r34-gt-t/tein-street-advance-coilover-suspension-kit-lowers-front-35-55mm-and-lowers-rear-25-45mm

Ideally, I've chosen my lowering path and honestly didn't think it was going to be this hard to just lower my car up to 50mm.

What are my options in your opinion, sticking with a springs/shock option. Source my own springs and supply? Different brand of springs supply by them?

FYI the quote I got: $210 per set for springs, up to $330 in labour to fit because they have to go through the back seats and up to $150 to custom fit my 5" venom cat (welding required, flanges don't match) - up to $900 total.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/468893-springssuspension-shop-stuff-around/
Share on other sites

Are you going to run stock shocks? 50mm drop is significant, your stock shocks will struggle and start leaking before long (mine did).

I had King Springs (can't remember exact code) on my R34 sedan and the drop was ~33mm front and ~38mm rear. The rear was super low, to the level that it was annoying.

Also with a 50mm drop you will end up with heaps of negative camber so will have worse traction and chew tyres. The OEM adjustment is not enough to fix that. Two choices: you can go eccentric bushes to get some relief (I did this first, the installation sucks), then realise that it's not enough, and go full adjustable arms (I ended up with this).

Quote

 

Ideally, I've chosen my lowering path and honestly didn't think it was going to be this hard to just lower my car up to 50mm.

I'm afraid it is. Due to the suspension design on these cars, to drop them properly means coilovers and a full set of adjustable arms (front camber arms, front castor rods, rear camber arms, rear tension/traction rods, ideally HICAS lock bar/delete). It's a minimum 2k job, typically more.

  • Like 2

Agree with above, lowing on stock suspension is not only stressing the strut but also reducing it's travel significantly.

Regardless of that:

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/NISSAN-SKYLINE-R33-R34-FRONT-REAR-SUPER-LOW-50mm-COIL-KING-SPRINGS-/151270647149?hash=item23386ee56d:m:mal3q8vkySuC55mzRvla1cg

Say they're King Springs and 50 mm "super low" maybe ring King Springs and see if that's a genuine product, I can't seem to find anything on their site, but may be discontinued stock.

Stock shocks for a month or two, then I'll fit aftermarket shocks (KYB) when I can tuck some funds away.

Contact Kings, they themselves say they don't offer 50mm on skylines due to the problems listed above, suspension travel etc.

I will look into the Teins for now, and go from there I guess. Honestly thinking about fitting BC coilovers and being done with it 

Update:

Have found a seller for a set of GTT Tein Coilovers in good condition, no leaks or knocks. 

Am I still in for all of the above problems if I were to purchase these and NOT lower to 50mm (sounds painful albeit anyway), more to 35-40mm?

Yeah look the basic issue is you are trying to go lower than the geometry allows for. suppliers have worked that out and don't make it because few people really want such a big drop, and those that try it will generally be unhappy with the results.

It's your call for sure, but there's a reason people don't make that drop off the shelf. If you want to go there you'll need custom springs, and the standard shocks (or kyb or similar stock replacements) will not be firm enough to suit so the ride will be bouncy.

If you want to go that low with well matched shocks and springs you should go aftermarket airbags. If you want to go that low and have it handle OK (eg not be unpredictable under bumps) it would cost 000s in custom suspension geometry.

Basically, if you want to go this way just buy cheap coil overs, drop them as low as possible and see what you think. springs and shocks need to work together, and standard shocks will not support what you are looking for.

  • Like 1

Don't do this.  It is just so f**ked up to plan to lower a car to far below the legal limit, far below the point where you will be dragging its guts on the ground everywhere you go, far below where you will f**k up your suspension geometry and turn it into something that rides and corners like a sack truck.  Just don't do it.

Drop to legal height.  This coincidentally is where the suspension is about as low as it can go and still work properly.  This is about an eyebrow height of 340-350mm (depends on R32/3/4).  Don't do this work in stages.  Doing it that way is dumb f**k stupid.  If you're not doing the work yourself you're paying someone to take it all apart more than once.  Save up, buy the springs and dampers (there's no such thing as a shock absorber) or the coilovers, when you can afford to do it all at once.  Don't buy secondhand coilovers if you're not prepared for them to be f**ked in some way that you can't see until after you've fitted them and tried to drive on them.  50%** of such transactions work out that way.  **Invented statistic that is nonetheless probably correct.

Doing this the wrong way will cost you $700 and make you either hate yourself or mistakenly think you've done the best thing ever.....until you try to keep up with someone with real suspension.  Doing everything you need to do will cost you at least $2k and you should reckon on it being a lot more than that if you have to buy a lot of arms to correct geometry.

Ordinarily I would suggest, based on your opening comments, that you should buy a set of Bilstein B6s from SydneyKid and suitable Kings springs.  However, these days I think the smart approach would have to be to look at some of the locally made coilover kits that seem to provide excellent performance for the money, but aren't going to come in at the same price as secondhand Jap coilovers.

Oh, and yes.  There's nothing magic about coilovers that fixes the geometry problems that result from going too low.  They just make it easier to go too low.

  • Like 1

I'm worried you might be headed for problems. The coilovers are a much better option than lowered springs, which will likely ruin whatever shocks you have, new or old. Search on here for SydneyKid's thread about using lowered springs with stock shocks for details.

Also, when you lower, you change the suspension geometry, so you will need various sets of adjustable arms/bushes to just be able to get the alignment back to where it should be. There are old SydneyKid threads that say how much extra kit you need for what height - the lower you go, the more extra kit you need.

You guys rule. Got a pretty decent idea about what I'd be getting myself into, and I'm not about geometry or spending more money than I need to in general so I'm just gonna go with you guys here.

Coilovers, legal height drop = done, so I can be done with suspension and cosmetics and focus on my engine/power mods

Thanks all

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...