Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fuel cooler placement, R34 GTT

Hi all,

Having rewired the fuel pump, the 040 buzzes pretty hard when the fuel is warm, usually only takes less than 30 min drive in summer and maybe under around 1 hr in winter before it starts screaming, so I thought I'd add a fuel cooler on the return line.

Trying to find somewhere to put the fuel cooler wasn't easy though, basically a few things I had in mind:

  • not drilling any holes on the chassis
  • not keen to put it in front of the car- explosions on collision

The best I could find was under the floor pan below the drivers seat along the chassis rail- what do people think of this location?

this is where I found:58a139f8865c9_fuelcooler1.jpg.ebdb70bc9c414f3925d59681bf114294.jpg

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/469067-fuel-cooler-placement-r34-gtt/
Share on other sites

And here's a photo of the cooler test fitted

IMG_1486961621.318894.jpg

Haven't finished making the bracket yet, will make a bracket to hold the fuel cooler to the sill once I'm sure that's where I'd place it. Any feedback on potential hazard or suggestions of other better location is welcomed

Placement of cooler was inspired by vw golf diesel models

If that's as flush to the floor as I think it is, then you need to change it so that it gets some air flow through it.  Move it away from the floor, make a small scoop of some sort to duct air to pass through it either going up or down, depending on nothing more than preference.

It is true that it will do some cooling as you have it......but it could do a lot more.

Hrm it sits slightly above the bottom of the chassis rail and the side sill. Plus the car isn't that low, so im not so worried about the height. You can see from the photo that the dump pipe and gearbox both sits lower than that and Ive never had clearance issues

Most Volkswagen diesels have their fuel cooler sitting at the bottom like this, albeit different style and positioned in between two rails which is probably more ideal

I'm with GTSBoy in that it won't do much without airflow, especially is butted against the floor ppan . you'll definitely need a scoop which will add height and complexity.

Suggestion: how about just a bigger capacity fuel pump with good large gauge rewire? Theoretically it would run at less capacity and cooler & quieter. Safer too compared to an external cooling core.

I've got a small Walbro 270 and it's noisy as anything on a track day but does calm down afterwards. I'm assuming 040 is of a similar capacity. Try Walbro 460 or something perhaps?

4 minutes ago, V28VX37 said:

I'm with GTSBoy in that it won't do much without airflow, especially is butted against the floor ppan . you'll definitely need a scoop which will add height and complexity.

Suggestion: how about just a bigger capacity fuel pump with good large gauge rewire? Theoretically it would run at less capacity and cooler & quieter. Safer too compared to an external cooling core.

I've got a small Walbro 270 and it's noisy as anything on a track day but does calm down afterwards. I'm assuming 040 is of a similar capacity. Try Walbro 460 or something perhaps?

Actually, that makes it worse.  Bigger pumps push the fuel around through the rail more often (picking up more engine bay heat) and they beat the crap out of the fuel in the pump itself.  A proper voltage control system is the best way to make the best use of bigger pumps.

If it were me, I would be putting it towards the rear of the car.  In front of the rear axle, opposite side to the exhaust.  About where the HICAS solenoid would be on an R32 if it was still there.  But even further tucked up.  Track GTRs used to run diff coolers there.

  • Like 1

There's not really much space there with the 33/34's because the fuel tank sits there now.
If it were me i'd invest in PWM fuel control and stop the fuel from getting hot in the first place instead of trying to cool it down after. Easier said than done of course.

  • Like 1

Yeah I had that location in mind at first but unfortunately it's where the fuel tank sits on the r33/34, the floor pan in front of the tank is also lower than the front, so the lowest point of the cooler will be sitting lower than the bottom of the chassis rail and be as low as the bottom of the exhaust

 

Here's a photo of it when I first trial fitted it

IMG_1487066365.622068.thumb.jpg.e52c38938dfbebfca149c4a3b6f85786.jpg

 

 

IMG_1487068102.628786.jpg

Looks much safer behind the diff like the above photo.

Flying off the track and hitting a ripple strip with the fuel cooler exposed next to the chassis rail would be dangerous.

I think GTSBoy's photo is referring to the cooler in front of the rear sway bar. I'm not sure how that is mounted but I'd imagine it will need some drilling on the floor pan, likewise with mounting behind the diff

I initially found this and was planning to copy this but found out it was for r32 gtr and won't work on r33/34 due to the location of fuel tank

IMG_1487119828.524245.jpg

And here's the Volkswagen/Audi set up- similar to where I've placed it, except it's a lot slimmer than the cooler I've got..

IMG_1487120211.532642.jpg

VW use a completely different cooler design.  If you're focused on running a cooler, look at the spec/type they have used.

Otherwise, really consider what Sneakey Pete has recommended.  Better approach all-round IMO.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi Yes we're a bit optimistic we might get something out of sealing up the two pipes of the external wastegate and reactivating the stock one. I believe the orginal stock wastegate was tack welded shut. It doesn't budge and visually looks closed and sealed. The car has noticeably more lag so it could be at least part of the problem, maybe all. It's definately one of the key changes made since last tune. And it's one that's more difficult to fully understand and measure, not like for instance timing or cylinder compression.  Thanks for that feedback, we'll let you know how this progresses. Fingers crossed.   Regards Rob
    • Transplanting the vvt from a 25neo into an rb26?
    • Well, I was going to say, "Is the wastegate set up so that it is not leaking?" That's actually a different thing to what you're asking about. In theory, if you have allowed the two halves of the manifold to commmunicate (more than the stock manifold does - which is at least a little bit) then the negative effect should be apparent in delayed spool, not in outrigth power. OK, maybe just maybe, a badly set up twin scroll wastegate "crosstalk" might kill the top end, although it's hard to see how. What is happening with the original wastegate in the turbo? is it sealed off properly. If it's left flapping in the breeze, it will f**k everything up. If it is still there, and can be returned to service, I'd be capping off the external (presuming the two halves can and will be isolated from each other after doing so) and have a go with just the stock wastegate. I have an internal wastegate in my highflowed rear housing. The bigger opening and flapper should be fine to >250 rwkW. So there's not exactly a pressing reason to have the external. Done right, an external will give better results. Done wrong, it might just be possible to have worse results. Report back!
    • Hi Rob It's a nistune ecu. Yes same shop, good reputation. Apparently the computer on the dyno is compensated for temperature.    Chris was saying that the lean or richness of the mixture would be covered in the actual tune, but he's already picking up in advance that it's under what it should be. Regards the dyno, it's also noticeable on the road. But I just want to add something that has just come in, it appears there might be something in the setup of the external wastegate. In the exhaust manifold there is a centre divider between the front three and rear three cylinders. The external wastegate has a pipe from each side that join at the wastegate. Theory is those two pipes just might be pypassing that divider and introducing a problem somehow. Is anyone familiar with the divider in the exhaust manifold and the effects if the two wastegate pipes were to create a bypass path? Thanks for your questions Rob, interested in your thoughts on this external wastegate bypass theory. Regards Rob
×
×
  • Create New...