Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

EOI: gtx3582 gen2

I have the gtx3582 gen2 on my car for 1200kms. I want a little more response so I might change to Gtx3576 gen2.

if someone interest my 3582 gen2, pm me please. Price will be around 2300 and you can have any size of rear housing because I will keep the old housing and buy a 3576 gen2 with the rear housing you want.(they only sale a kit, no supercore)

locate Gold Coast.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 years later...
On 3/20/2017 at 1:54 AM, Nosure said:

I used have gtx3576 gen1 with rb26. It spool 600 rpm early than my 3582 gen2 with 2.8.  

If no one interest my 3582 I will set the 8700rpm limiter. Then I should still have same power band as 3576. 

Hi mate. Wondering how you ended up going? Did you go for the 3576? If so what were the results? I'm currently on -5 twins having just tuned to 370kw at 20 pound, but I'd like to simplify the bay, see full boost 500rpm earlier (currently ~4500) and possibly get to 400kw on the same boost. 

I've read mixed results about the 3582 gen 2, thinking I'd get better response and not lose top end with the 76 rear instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I am currently going this route. I am curious how much horse power you put behind the cut bell housing? Collins was telling me I am going to crack it and bluh bluh bluh. Because I didn’t buy the custom fly wheel from him. I am looking for somewhere around like 500 hp
    • Forgot to mention that these are the before pics when I first got it!
    • Thanks @PranK for the updated member status, much appreciated! 👍🏼 Now, about those pics… Unfortunately I could only find ones that I took in the dark. I was soon to discover that underneath it wasn’t in the best shape, but it was mine and that’s all I cared about at the time 😆
    • Oh, and only having done this task yesterday, I've now driven the car ~60km since, and while it is hard to avoid placebo effect and confirmation bias, I reckon that some annoyances I had with the way the car has been behaving have improved. Which....kinda makes sense, I guess. If the bushes were really stiff and resisting rotation, they would have been contributing to the effective wheel rate. And if it was more so on one side (which it was, because one side was worse than the other) then.... you might imagine that the additional rate would be asymmetric, and potentially even different between compression and rebound. And so... the car has been twitchy at higher speeds - like freeway on ramps. It really shouldn't be. The wheel alignment is good and there are no (other) known problems elsewhere in the suspension. But at 90-100 on a long sweeping ramp, tiny steering wheel motions would make it feel like it wanted to rear steer. Quite nervous. At lower speeds it would heave about in a manner that it didn't use to. Didn't want to put power down, etc etc. Now...seems to behave better. Am going to have to concentrate on the various corners where it has exhibited weirdness, on the rare occasions when I can get a decent run at them without Methanial getting in the way in his D-Max/Ranger/LDV Van/etc.
×
×
  • Create New...