Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Don't forget, R34 uses 14mm bolt holes.. so.. the AOR kit will need bolt sleeves OR tapped out to accept 14mm bolts.

Then.. your brake balances will be aids, we have set this up on a S15, running a BM57 and R33 GTS-t rear calipers. Car doesn't stop as well as my piece of shit GTS-t rust bucket running just basic 350Z Brembo calipers (same shit as R34 GT-R just offset a few mms out), not to mention it weights more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Evo brakes have pretty big pistons which is why on paper they will make for bitey brakes. Though plenty of people running them and happy 

You have an R34...if you are doing brakes be a man

20161104_210741.jpg

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎1‎/‎04‎/‎2017 at 3:31 PM, ActionDan said:

You only turn up in my threads when you wanna sell me something lol

Doesn't need hektik brakes - street car.

Hey you ignore all my advice anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/03/2017 at 3:10 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Don't forget, R34 uses 14mm bolt holes.. so.. the AOR kit will need bolt sleeves OR tapped out to accept 14mm bolts.

Then.. your brake balances will be aids, we have set this up on a S15, running a BM57 and R33 GTS-t rear calipers. Car doesn't stop as well as my piece of shit GTS-t rust bucket running just basic 350Z Brembo calipers (same shit as R34 GT-R just offset a few mms out), not to mention it weights more.

They're made specific to each car, if you're talking about the Alpha Omega Racing stuff, so if he has an R34 GTR then he buys the R34 GTR kit and bolt it on. Other than the bending (I prefer completely removing) the backing plate to make room for a larger rotor - which you must do for all brake upgrades - they are 100% bolt on, no sleeving no tapping no modifying whatsoever... provided you buy the right parts for the car.

Bias wise any front-only upgrade will move the bias forward - that's a given. Standard R34 GTR bias is 70:30 and R34 GTR NUR-spec bias is 68:32. With the matching front and rear upgrade the Evo 350mm Brembo bias is 69:31, this makes it a perfectly perfect bias. All the technical specifications are listed and also within contains a link to a 3rd party bias calculator for you to verify: http://alphaomegaracing.com/p/149/c/72/Z32/ALPHA-OMEGA/Evo-350mm-Brembo-Rear-Brake-Adapter-Kit-WTAC-Edition.html

If someone like Dan upgrades his R34 GTR to front and rear Alpha Omega Racing braking stuff, there are well founded reasons to believe the car will consistently brake/stop in a shorter distance + be more stable over any duration + have longer rotor and pad life.

I hope that information is helpful for somebody reading, cheers

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...