Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Intermittent Performance

34R, -9s, e85, haltech etc etc. Approx 350rwkw at 24 or so psi. 

Have recently fixed 2 boost leaks (front turbo to TT pipe and IAT sensor on back of plazmaman cooler) but am finding that even after this the "punch" is intermittent, sometimes it's there/good, sometimes it's lacking that extra kick at WOT. 

Using onboard haltech map sensor so it stops telling me anything useful after 21psi. No faults being thrown, car has wideband and oil pressure kit also. 

I thought it might be intake air temps (pods with an enclosure), as it's been warmer here, but I've had the car feel great and not so great on 27 deg intake temps in the same driving session. 

Car is going in soon for cams and valve springs, but if there's anything else I can check, I'm all ears. I've boost leak tested the entire intake tract up to 40psi using a leak down tester. 

The difference feels like when I went from airbox and 21psi to pods, better cooler, and 24psi, which was about a 20kw/100Nm gain. 

What power are stock GTR bov's good for? Any point in me disconnecting the Mac solenoid for a test? 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/469686-intermittent-performance/
Share on other sites

What condition is your electrical system e.g. Alternator output as RB's can suffer voltage drop at mid to high rpm's

type of plugs can make a difference some are better than others if it is a voltage drop.

Check out ADVANCE alternators 150amp as a solution on www.rhdjapan.com they are about $950.00 to $980.00 plus freight.

where does your cold air induction feed from e.g. bonnet, front bar, behind headlight, or intake catch above radiator?

Heat shield between pod filters and engine can help create a cool zone for air pick up.

Was holding off as the upcoming cam install meant I'd likely need less boost for my goal (500rwhp or so).

Can bovs be intermittent​? Am i just clutching at straws there?

Disconnecting boost control solenoid not gonna tell me much is it, other than actuators are fine to standard pressure (1 bar I think)

When we did the pods/cooler it was happier to make more boost so was tuned a few pound beyond the onboard map limit.

Similar to what race pace used to do when tuning beyond max flow of the standard AFMs.

Done on the dyno of course.

Anyway can get a sensor, not a big deal if seeing max boost is the absolute first step.





Similar to what race pace used to do when tuning beyond max flow of the standard AFMs.



So isn't this based on an extrapolation of the tune at the max flow of the AFMs assuming that components are the same and behave the same (linearly)?

If you have had boost leaks and turned on Antilag for a while then things aren't the same / behaving the same?

Is a higher PSI MAP sensor equivalent to using Nismo AFMs (in this regard)?

Yep, It was tuned on the dyno at 24psi, on his gauge and using my onboard wideband as a cross reference.

 

The anti lag is just a couple of tick boxes and were not turned on when it was tuned, it's also off now so it's not a factor.

 

Wouldn't matter even if it was on as the launch control has nothing to do with what we're discussing here (wot performance) and the rally anti lag only fires between shifts after you lift off the throttle.

 

What I'm talking about is how much power it's making/how hard you get pushed back into your seat, during full throttle stints.

 

That doesn't feel consistent currently, but i cant figure out what the variables are.

 

I thought it might have been purely IAT, as i have pods (shielded yes with cold feed from headlight and inner guard, but still not as well shielded as stock airbox) but the other night out and about for a big Chrysler show locally it was hit and miss with similar air temps.

 

 

16 hours ago, ActionDan said:

Approx 350rwkw at 24 or so psi. 

Have recently fixed 2 boost leaks.

Using onboard haltech map sensor so it stops telling me anything useful after 21psi. 

11 hours ago, ActionDan said:

Disconnecting boost control solenoid not gonna tell me much is it, other than actuators are fine to standard pressure (1 bar I think)

OK.  I've taken a deep breath before saying anything :)

Questions:

1) Is the Haltech controlling boost, or do you have a separate electronic boost control driving the solenoid which CAN see past 21psi?

2) Did you tuner at all oppose this idea of tuning past the MAP sensor's visibility?

3) Did you get the tune looked at after fixing the boost leaks?

 

Edited by Lithium

lol, deep breathes :D

 

1) Yes. 
2) He said it's best to have the 3 bar sensor but that we can tune past it and see how it goes, I guess this is part of the answer. 
3) No, but I'm certain the car would have only had the IAT sensor leak (small), if at all, as the response and power both on and off the dyno after the tune was solid. I only started checking for leaks as I felt the difference in the car. The big leak was the gasket between front turbo and TT pipe connection. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Result of another R35GTR build. Similar specs as above except this is running our bigger size SS-2 profile option. Made similar power except this car runs on Pump 98 fuel. Build specs are: Nissan R35 GTR 2015 model stock engine and box. ETS street intercooler boost logi intercooler piping with tial bov, boost logi turbo inlet pipe ID 1050 injector DW 300C fuel pump Decatted oem down pipe and y pipe& HKS exaust 3inch intake pipe Upgraded actautors HyperGear SS-2 high flow option Final result is 639whp / 477wkws hubs, Ron 93 / P98 fuel at 20psi.  
    • Duncan:- it affect both sides.  Driver side is worse.
    • That seems like a very special issue!  Does it affect both sides? Either way, I would disconnect the driver's side switch and see if it still happens, noting that might require removal of the whole door card which is a bit of a pain (it does on V37 and HY51)  
    • MBS206:- The windows start to slowly open themselves. GTSBoy:- Battery is new since Dec. 
    • I currently have a 2008 370GT Coupe, with the big brakes (Akebeno if I'm correct), and Its coming time to get new pads. Previously, I had a 2003 350GT Coupe with the stock sized brakes, not Brembos. I had custom wheels on it that were pretty open to the brakes, and when I first put the wheels on it, the rims where completely coated with brake dust. A few years after adding the new rims, I needed to change to pads on that car. I didn't do any research, but I told the mechanic of the problem with the brake dust. I also told him I didn't track the car or even drive around the streets harshley. But the dust was an issue. The mechanics changed the pads to a different compound, and the dust was GONE! The other change I noted was that when coming to a complete stop, instead of having to press harder on the pedal as I approached 0kph, I had to actually lift off a little to not come to a hard jerky stop.( My unfounded explanation is they became stickier as they heated by stopping ) Since I got my 370gt with big brakes, I noticed that that as I came closer to stopping, I had to press harder and harder to reach a full stop. I am not talking about hard, just harder. I brought the car in from another state, so when I had a blue slip done, I asked the mechanic what he thought of the brakes, and he thought they were brilliant. The only negative of these pads on the 350GT, was that they squealed when cold. So driving out of a shopping center carpark, it was a little embarrassing, as the brakes squealed, and I am sure people thought that I needed new brakes, when they were actually fresh. I have no idea of what type of compound they were on the 350gt, but whatever it was, I want to get the exact same on my 370GT. They weren't ridiculously expensive, and were replaced at the local JAX (which is no longer open), so I am certain they would be a pretty common big brand, off the shelf type/brand. My current mechanic suggested I need top get the rear pads changed soonish, but he suggested standard Brembo pads. Which I expect to behave the same as the current ones and not like the ones on the 350GT.  I don't think dust will be an issue on the 370GT. With the behaviour I describe above on the 360GT, does anyone have a suggestion of pad material that will act like the change I had done on the 350GT?
×
×
  • Create New...